Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 263, 2021
XXIV International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2021)
Article Number 05029
Number of page(s) 13
Section Global Environmental Challenges
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126305029
Published online 28 May 2021
  1. F.H. Abanda, L. Byers, An investigation of the impact of building orientation on energy consumption in a domestic building using emerging BIM (Building Information Modelling), Energy., 97, pp. 517–527 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. A.F. Abd Rashid, S. Yusoff, A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 45, pp. 244–248 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Negendahl, T.R. Nielsen, Building energy optimization in the early design stages: a simplified method, Energy Build. (2015) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Ahmad, M.J. Thaheem, Developing a residential building-related social sustainability assessment framework and its implications for BIM, Sustain. Cities Soc., 28, pp. 1–15 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. Cao, H. Li, G. Wang, Impacts of isomorphic pressures on BIM adoption in construction projects, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  6. Volkov A., Chelyshkov P., Sedov A., Application of computer simulation to ensure comprehensive security of buildings., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 409, pp. 630–633 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Atazadeh, B., Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., Comparing Three Types of BIM-based Models for Managing 3D Ownership Interests in Multi-level Buildings, in: 5th International Fig. 3D Cadastre Workshop. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), Athens, Greece, pp. 183–198 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  8. Mohamad Kassem, Bilal Succar, Macro BIM adoption: Comparative market analysis, Automation in Construction, 81, Pages 286–299 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. I.B. Kjartansdóttir, BIM Adoption in Iceland and Its Relation to Lean Construction, Master’s of Science in Construction Management Master’s), Reykjavík University, Reykjavík (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Marzouk, S. Azab, M. Metawie, BIM-based approach for optimizing life cycle costs of sustainable buildings, J. Clean. Prod. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  11. Y. Geng, W. Ji, Z. Wang, B. Lin, Y. Zhu, A review of operating performance in green buildings: energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction, Energy Build. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. T. Lehtinen, Advantages and Disadvantages of Vertical Integration in the Implementation of Systemic Process Innovations: Case Studies on Implementing Building Information Modelling (BIM) in the Finnish Construction Industry, Master’s Thesis, Aalto University (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. McGraw-Hill-Construction, The business value of BIM in Australia and New Zealand, SmartMarket Report (2014) [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernando G. Bañuelos Blanco, Haibo Chen, The Implementation of Building Information Modelling in the United Kingdom by the Transport Industry, The 9th International Conference on Traffic & Transportation Studies (ICTTS’2014), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 510–520, 138 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. Ali Aryo Bawono, Christian Maximilian von Schumann, and Bernhard Lechner, Study of Building Information Modelling Implementation on Railway Infrastructure, ICCCBE 2020, LNCE 98, pp. 372–382, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  16. Mohammed Jawaluddeen Sani and Alias Abdul Rahman, GIS AND BIM INTEGRATION AT DATA LEVEL: A REVIEW, International Conference on Geomatics and Geospatial Technology (GGT 2018), 3–5 September 2018, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [Google Scholar]
  17. Fabrizio D’Amico, Alessandro Calvi, Eleonora Schiattarella, Mauro Di Prete, BIM And GIS Data Integration: A Novel Approach Of Technical/Environmental Decision-Making Process In Transport Infrastructure Design, AIIT 2nd International Congress on Transport Infrastructure and Systems in a changing world (TIS ROMA 2019), 23rd-24th September 2019, Rome, Italy, Transportation Research Procedia 45, pp. 803–810 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. RailBaltica project; Available: https://www.railbaltica.org [Google Scholar]
  19. RailBaltica BIM documentation; Available: https://www.railbaltica.org/rb-rail-as-bim-documentation/ [Google Scholar]
  20. Vasily Kupriyanovsky etc. BIM on the world’s railways - development, examples, and standards, International Journal of Open Information Technologies, vol. 8 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  21. High Speed 2 project; Available: https://www.hs2.org.uk, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Speed_2 [Google Scholar]
  22. Steve Cockerell, Director Industry Marketing – Road and Rail, Bentley Systems “China Railway Sets Benchmark for Full-lifecycle BIM on Beijing-Zhangjiakou Rail Project”; Available: https://www.cbnme.com/logistics-news/china-railway-sets-benchmark-for-full-lifecycle-bim-on-beijing-zhangjiakou-rail-project/ [Google Scholar]
  23. Korean Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Yonsei University “Rail BIM 2030 Roadmap“; Available: http://big.yonsei.ac.kr/railbim/reports/RailBIM2030Roadmap_Full_Eng_Final.pdf [Google Scholar]
  24. The Rail BIM 2030 roadmap project; Available: https://www.gim-international.com/content/article/the-rail-bim-2030-roadmap-project [Google Scholar]
  25. Implementation of Building Information Modeling (BIM) in the Infrastructure Division of Deutsche Bahn AG, Deutsche Bahn AG 2019, Available: https://www.deutschebahn.com/resource/blob/4114234/f17c340682cd9e8f6bfe3faae86e0f52/BIM-Strategy-Deutsche-Bahn-en-data.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Vasily Kupriyanovsky, Dmitry Namiot, German Sukonnikov, Natalia Fedorova, Petr Bubnov, “Comfortable environment and resources for passenger stations in the lifecycle of digital railways assets”, International Journal of Open Information Technologies, vol. 5, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. Lieyun Ding, Weiguang Jiang, Ying Zhou, Cheng Zhou, Sheng Liu, BIM-based task-level planning for robotic brick assembly through image-based 3D modeling, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Volume 43 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. Idris Othman, Yasser Yahya Al-Ashmori, Yani Rahmawati, Y.H. Mugahed Amran, Mohammed Ali Mohammed Al-Bared, The level of Building Information Modelling (BIM) Implementation in Malaysia, Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Volume 12, Pages 455–463 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. Moumita Das, Xingyu Tao, Jack C.P. Cheng, BIM security: A critical review and recommendations using encryption strategy and blockchain, Automation in Construction, Volume 126 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  30. Ali Abbas, Zia Ud Din, Rizwan Farooqui, Integration of BIM in Construction Management Education: An Overview of Pakistani Engineering Universities, Procedia Engineering, Volume 145, Pages 151–157 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  31. Jan Fridrich, Karel Kubečka, BIM – The Process of Modern Civil Engineering in Higher Education, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 141, Pages 763–767 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Zolotova, N. Vatin, E. Tuchkevich, Rechinsky. A. Autodesk Revit - Key To Successful Training Of Highly Qualified Civil Engineers, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 725-726, pp. 1617–1625 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  33. E. Tuchkevich, A. Rechinsky, N. Vatin, J. Zolotova, V. Tuchkevich, The Benefits Of Authorized Training Center Autodesk For Higher Education Institutions, Energy., Applied Mechanics and Materials, 725-726, pp. 1626–1633 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  34. O. Gamayunova, N. Vatin, BIM-technology in architectural design, Advanced Materials Research, 1065–1069, pp. 2611–2614 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  35. A.O. Asojo, Connecting Academia with Industry: Pedagogical Experiences from a Collaborative Design Project, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 105, pp. 304–313 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  36. Stefania Fabozzi, Salvatore Antonio Biancardo, Rosa Veropalumbo, Emilio Bilotta, I-BIM based approach for geotechnical and numerical modelling of a conventional tunnel excavation, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Volume 108 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  37. Felix Hegemann, Janosch Stascheit, Ulrich Maidl, As-built documentation of segmental lining rings in the BIM representation of tunnels, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Volume 106 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. Pedram Ghannad, Yong-Cheol Lee, Johannes Dimyadi, Wawan Solihin, Automated BIM data validation integrating open-standard schema with visual programming language, Advanced Engineering Informatics, Volume 40, Pages 14–28 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  39. Rui He, Mingkai Li, Vincent J.L. Gan, Jun Ma, BIM-enabled computerized design and digital fabrication of industrialized buildings: A case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, Volume 278 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  40. Filip Biljecki, Joie Lim, James Crawford, Diana Moraru, Helga Tauscher, Amol Konde, Kamel Adouane, Simon Lawrence, Patrick Janssen, Rudi Stouffs, Extending CityGML for IFC-sourced 3D city models, Automation in Construction, Volume 121 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  41. Huaquan Ying, Sanghoon Lee, A rule-based system to automatically validate IFC second-level space boundaries for building energy analysis, Automation in Construction, Volume 127 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  42. Huaquan Ying, Sanghoon Lee, Generating second-level space boundaries from large-scale IFC-compliant building information models using multiple geometry representations, Automation in Construction, Volume 126 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  43. Junxiang Zhu, Xiangyu Wang, Peng Wang, Zhiyou Wu, Mi Jeong Kim, Integration of BIM and GIS: Geometry from IFC to shapefile using open-source technology, Automation in Construction, Volume 102, Pages 105–119 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  44. Hao Wang, Yisha Pan, Xiaochun Luo, Integration of BIM and GIS in sustainable built environment: A review and bibliometric analysis, Automation in Construction, Volume 103, Pages 41–52 (2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.