Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 263, 2021
XXIV International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2021)
Article Number 05044
Number of page(s) 6
Section Global Environmental Challenges
Published online 28 May 2021
  1. Yu. Ya. Eleneva, V.N. Andreev, Li Zhiyu. Development of an approach to the management of investment projects in industrial enterprises on the basis of risk assessment. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics 9 (2), pp. 489-500 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. V.V. Kovalyov. Methods of evaluating investment projects. M: Finance and Statistics (2009). [Google Scholar]
  3. A.A. Vilensky, V.N. Livshits, S.A. Smolyak. Evaluation of the effectiveness of investment projects. Theory and practice. 3rd ed., Approx., Supplement. M.: Case (2012). [Google Scholar]
  4. I.V. Lipsits, V.V. Kosov. Investment project: methods of preparation and analysis. M.: BECK (2012). [Google Scholar]
  5. R.B. Peiser, A.B. Frey. Professional real estate development. ULI Business Guide. M.: UDP (2003). [Google Scholar]
  6. O. Helmer. Social Technology, N.Y. (1966). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Violante, C. Dominguez, A. Paiva, Risk management in construction projects: are small companies prepared? MOJ Civil Eng. 4(1), pp. 1-7 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. P. J. Edwards, P. A. Bowen. Risk and risk management in construction: A review and future directions for research, Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 339–349 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Flanagan, G. Norman. Risk Management and Consruction. 5 Aufl, Oxford (UK): Blackwall Science (2000). [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Hilson. Project risk management: Future developments, International Journal of Project and Business Risk Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1–11, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Park, H.W. Lee, K. Choi, et al. Project Risk Factors Facing Construction Management Firms. Int J Civ Eng 17, pp. 305–321 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. V.K. Gupta, J.J. Thakkar. A quantitative risk assessment methodology for construction project. Sādhanā 43, p.116 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Ustinovichius, G. Shevchenko, D. Kochin, R. Simonaviciene. Classification of the Investment Risk in Construction. In: Luo Y. (eds) Cooperative Design, Visualization, and Engineering. CDVE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4674. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2007). [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Malekitabar, A. Ardeshir, M. H. Sebt, R. Stouffs and E. A. L. Teo. On the calculus of risk in construction projects: contradictory theories and a rationalized approach. Saf. Sci. 101, pp.72–85 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. L. Farina, E. Danesi, A. Travaglini, M. Mancini, P. Trucco. Integration of Constructability and Project Risk Management. In: Viles E., Ormazábal M., Lleó A. (eds) Closing the Gap Between Practice and Research in Industrial Engineering. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Amit, B. Dutta, M.J. Kolhatkar. Study of risk management in construction projects. Int J Manag 5(6), pp. 976–6502 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. X. Zhao, B.G. Hwang, W. Phng. Construction project risk management in Singapore: Resources, effectiveness, impact, and understanding. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 18, pp. 27–36 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. E. L. Giles, M. Brennan, A. Albogamy, N. Dawood. Development of a client-based risk management methodology for the early design stage of construction processes: applied to the KSA. Eng. Construct. Archittect. Manag. 22, pp. 493–515 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. W. Jung, S. H. Han. Which risk management is most crucial for controlling project cost? J. Manag. Eng. 33(5), pp. 22–25 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. A.N. Baba Ahmed, A. Megnounif. The impact of risk management on business performance: case of Algerian construction organizations. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, p. 102 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  21. B.P. Titarenko, S.M. Lubkin, S.Y. Eroshkin, N.A. Kameneva. Robust and traditional methods of risk management in investment and construction projects. Tenth International Conference Management of Large-Scale System Development (MLSD), IEEE, pp. 1–4. (2017). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.