EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 263 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 263 (2021) 05049 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 263, 2021
XXIV International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2021)
Article Number 05049
Number of page(s) 10
Section Global Environmental Challenges
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126305049
Published online 28 May 2021
  1. S. Baldi, H. Borgman, A case study of the automotive industry, in 14th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, Slovenia (2001) [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Chandra, S. Kumar, Supply chain management in theory and practice: A passing fad or a fundamental change?, Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 100, 100–114 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. J.T. Mentzer, W. Dewitt, J.S. Keebler, S. Min, N.W. Nix, C.D. Smith, Z.G. Zacharia, Defining supply chain management, J. Bus. Logist. 22, 1–25 (2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Fliedner, CPFR: An emerging supply chain tool, Ind. Manage. Data Syst. 103, 14–21 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Li, B. Ragu-Nathan, T.S. Ragu-Nathan, S.S. Rao, The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance, Omega-Int. J. Manage. Sci. 34, 107–124 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Monk, B. Wagner, Concepts in enterprise resource planning (Cengage Learning, Boston, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Brint, A. Genovese, C. Piccolo, Reducing data requirements when selecting key performance indicators for supply chain management: The case of multinational automotive component manufacturer, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 233, 107967 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  8. D.M. Lambert, Supply chain management: Processes, partnerships, performance (Supply Chain Management Institute, Sarasota, Florida, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  9. M.W. Lewis, C. Andriopoulos, W.K. Smith, Paradoxical leadership to enable strategic agility, Calif. Manage. Rev. 56, 58–77 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Konovalenko, A. Ludwig, Event processing in supply chain management – the status quo and research outlook, Comput. Ind. 105, 229–249 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Pagell, Z.H. Wu, Building a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management using case studies of 10 exemplars, J. Supply Chain Manag. 45, 37–56 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  12. L.Y. Shen, V.W.Y. Tam, Y.-b. Ji, Project feasibility study: The key to successful implementation of sustainable and socially responsible construction management practice, J. Clean Prod. 18, 254–259 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Boone, R. Ganeshan, A. Jain, N.R. Sanders, Forecasting sales in the big supply chain: Consumer analytics in the big data era, Int. J. Forecast. 35, 170–180 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. RezaHoseini, S. Noori, S.F. Ghannadpour, Integrated scheduling of suppliers and multi-project activities for green construction supply chains under uncertainty, Autom. Constr. 122, 103485 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Chopra, P. Meindl, Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (Prentice Hall, New York, 2001) [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Yousaf, B.S. Talal, R. Obaid, Integration of IoT technologies in construction chain networks; CPEC a case in point, Sustainable Oper. Comput. 1, 28–34 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Cucchiella, I. D’Adamo, Issue on supply chain if renewable energy, Energy Conv. Manag. 76, 774–780 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos, V. Loepoulos, Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry, J. Clean Prod. 279, 123774 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  19. M.M.C. Fritz, Sustainable supply chain management, in L. Filho et al., (eds) Responsible consumption and production, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Springer, Cham, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. C.Y. Wong, C.W. Wong, S. Boonitt, Integrating environmental management into supply chains, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 45, 43–68 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.P. Schöggl, R.J. Baumgartner, D. Hofer, Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry, J. Clean Prod. 140, 1602–1617 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. C.R. Carter, D.S. Rogers, A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38, 360–387 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. B. Moldan, A.L. Dahl, Editorial, Ecol. Indic. 12, 1–3 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. J.L.N. Zon, C.J. Loepoldino, L.H. Yamane, R.R. Siman, Waste pickers organizations and municipal selective waste collection: Sustainability indicators, Waste Manage. 118, 219–231 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  25. I. Gunnasdottir, B. Davidsdottir, E. Worrell, Review of indicators for sustainable energy development, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 133, 110294 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Yadegaridehkordi, M. Hourmand, M. Nilashi, E. Asolami, Assesment of sustainability indicators for green builing manufacturing using fuzzy multi-criteria making approach, J. Clean Prod. 277, 122905 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Merino-Saum, P. Halla, V. Superti, A. Boesch, C.R. Binder, Indicators for urban sustainability: Key lessons from systematic analysis of 67 measurement initiatives, Ecol. Indic. 119, 106879 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  28. S.F. Salami, A.D. Isah, I.B. Muhammad, Critical indicators of sustainability for mixed-use buildings in Lagos, Nigeria, Environ. Sust. Indic. 9, 1001101 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. J. Reid, M. Rout, Developing sustainability indicators – The need for radical transparency, Ecol. Indic. 110, 105941 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  30. D.B. Huertas, F. Farinha, M.J. Oliveira, E. Silva, Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms to estimate sustainability indicators, Sust. Cities Soc. 63, 102430 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  31. H. Wang, X. Lu, C. Sheng, W. Cui, General frame for arbitrary 3R subproblems based on the POE model, Robot. Auton. Syst. 105, 138–145 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  32. Y. Shuanggui, J. Baoguo, L. Chun, The tentative idea of energy recovery based on “3R” principle, Procedia Engineering. 21, 1188–1192 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Huang, X. Wang, Y. Geng, R. Bleischtwitz, Construction and demolition waste management in China through the 3Rprinciple, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 129, 36–44 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Gunnasdottir, B. Davidsdottir, E. Worrell, It is best to ask: Designing a stakeholder-centric approach to selecting sustainable energy development indicators, Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 45, 101968 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  35. S. Quamar, M. Al-Kindi, Renewability and sustainability: Current status and future prospects, Encyclopedia of Renewable and Sustainable Materials. 1, 717–730 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  36. Y. Shi, J. Xu, BIM-based information system for econo-enviro-friendly end-of-life disposal of construction and demolition waste, Autom. Constr. 125, 103611 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Yildiz, S. Kivrak, A.B. Gultekin, G. Arslan, Built environmental design – social sustainability relation in urban renewal, Sust. Cities Soc. 60, 102173 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. Q. Zhang, B.L. Oo, B.T.H. Lim, Drivers, motivations, and barriers to the implementation of corporate social responsibility practices by construction enterprises: A review, J. Clean Prod. 210, 563–584 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  39. C. Brix-Asala, A.K. Geisbush, P. Sauer, P. Schopflin, A. Zehendner, Sustainability tensions in supply chains: A case study of paradoxes and their management, Sustainability. 10, 424 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  40. A. Ashby, M. Leat, M. Hudson-Smith, Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature, Supply Chain Manag. 17, 497–516 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Chopra, P. Meindl, Supply chain management, 6th ed. (Pearson Education, Inc., New York, 2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.