EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 264 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 264 (2021) 01001 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 264, 2021
International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 14
Section Ecology, Hydropower Engineering and Modeling of Physical Processes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401001
Published online 02 June 2021
  1. Ghebrehiwot A. A. and Kozlov D. V., Hydrological modelling for ungauged basins of arid and semi-arid regions: review, Vestn. MGSU, 14 (8), pp. 1023–1036, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. Hrachowitz M. et al., A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)-a review, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58 (6), pp. 1198–1255, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Sivapalan M. et al., IAHS Decade on Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB), 20032012: Shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, Hydrol. Sci. J., 48 (6), pp. 857–880, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  4. Fekete B. M. and Vörösmarty C. J., The current status of global river discharge monitoring and potential new technologies complementing traditional discharge measurements, in Predictions in Ungauged Basins: PUB Kick-off (Proceedings of the PUB Kick-off meeting held in Brasilia, 20-22 November 2002), IAHS publication, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Vörösmarty C. et al., Global water data: A newly endangered species, Eos, 82 (5), (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. Shiklomanov A. I., Lammers R. B. and Vörösmarty C. J., Widespread decline in hydrological monitoring threatens Pan-Arctic research, Eos (Washington. DC), 83 (2), (2002). [Google Scholar]
  7. Shiklomanov A. I. and Lammers R. B., Record Russian river discharge in 2007 and the limits of analysis, Environ. Res. Lett., 4 (045015), pp. 9, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  8. Ghebrehiwot A. A. and Kozlov D. V., Statistical and spatial variability of climate data in the Mareb-Gash river basin in Eritrea, Vestn. MGSU, 15 (1), pp. 85–99, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. Dile Y. T. and Srinivasan R., Evaluation of CFSR climate data for hydrologic prediction in data-scarce watersheds: An application in the blue nile river basin, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 50 (5), pp. 1226–1241, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. Fuka D. R., Walter M. T., Macalister C., Degaetano A. T., Steenhuis T. S. and Easton Z. M., Using the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as weather input data for watershed models, Hydrol. Process., 28 (22), pp. 5613–5623, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  11. Auerbach D. A., Easton Z. M., Walter M. T., Flecker A. S. and Fuka D. R., Evaluating weather observations and the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis as inputs for hydrologic modelling in the tropics, Hydrol. Process., 30 (19), pp. 34663477, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. Mararakanye N., Le Roux J. J. and Franke A. C., Using satellite-based weather data as input to SWAT in a data poor catchment, Phys. Chem. Earth, 117, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  13. Grusson Y., Anctil F., Sauvage S., and Pérez J. M. S., Testing the SWAT model with gridded weather data of different spatial resolutions, Water (Switzerland), 9 (1), (2017). [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghebrehiwot A. A. and Kozlov D. V., Assessment of applicability of MIKE 11-NAM hydrological module for rainfall runoff modelling in a poorly studied river basin, Vestn. MGSU, 15 (7), pp. 1030–1046, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. Refsgaard J. C. and Knudsen J., Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 32 (7), pp. 2189–2202, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  16. Nkiaka E., Nawaz N. R., and Lovett J. C., Evaluating global reanalysis datasets as input for hydrological modelling in the Sudano-Sahel region, Hydrology, 4 (1), (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. Arnold J. G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R. S., and Williams J. R., Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model development, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34 (1), pp. 73–89, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  18. Arnold J. G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R. S., and Allen P. M., Continental scale simulation of the hydrologic balance, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 35 (5), (1999). [Google Scholar]
  19. Schuol J., Abbaspour K. C., Yang H., Srinivasan R., and Zehnder A. J. B., Modeling blue and green water availability in Africa, Water Resour. Res., 44 (7), (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Schuol J., Abbaspour K. C., Srinivasan R., and Yang H., Estimation of freshwater availability in the West African sub-continent using the SWAT hydrologic model, J. Hydrol., 352 (1-2), (2008). [Google Scholar]
  21. Gassman P. W., Reyes M. R., Green C. H., and Arnold J. G., The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions, Transactions of the ASABE, 50 (4). (2007). [Google Scholar]
  22. Arnold J. G., et al., SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation, Trans. ASABE, 55 (4), (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Abbaspour K. C., SWAT-CUP 2012: SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs -A User Manual, Sci. Technol., (2014). [Google Scholar]
  24. Abbaspour K. C., Rouholahnejad E., Vaghefi S., Srinivasan R., Yang H., and Kleve B., A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model, J. Hydrol., 524, pp. 733–752, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. Yang D. and Musiake K., A continental scale hydrological model using the distributed approach and its application to Asia, Hydrol. Process., 17 (14), (2003). [Google Scholar]
  26. Kozlov D. V. and Ghebrehiwot A. A., Efficacy of digital elevation and Nash models in runoff forecast, Mag. Civ. Eng., 3 (87), pp. 103–122, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  27. Gehbrehiwot A. and Kozlov D., GIUH-Nash based runoff prediction for Debarwa catchment in Eritrea, E3S Web Conf., 97 (05001), pp. 1–11, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  28. Abbaspour K. C., Vaghefi S. A., Yang H., and Srinivasan R., Global soil, landuse, evapotranspiration, historical and future weather databases for SWAT Applications, Sci. data, 6 (1), p. 263, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  29. Abbaspour K. C., Johnson C. A., and van Genuchten M. T., Estimating uncertain flow and transport parameters using a sequential uncertainty fitting procedure, Vadose Zo. J., 3 (4), pp. 1340–1352, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  30. Kouchi D. H., Esmaili K., Faridhosseini A., Sanaeinejad S. H., Khalili D., and Abbaspour K. C., Sensitivity of calibrated parameters and water resource estimates on different objective functions and optimization algorithms, Water (Switzerland), 9 (6), (2017). [Google Scholar]
  31. Gupta H. V., Sorooshian S., and Yapo P. O., Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration, J. Hydrol. Eng., 4 (2), pp. 135–143, (1999). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.