Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 264, 2021
International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2021)
Article Number 01053
Number of page(s) 7
Section Ecology, Hydropower Engineering and Modeling of Physical Processes
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126401053
Published online 02 June 2021
  1. A. Mukhammadiev, A. Denmukhammadiev, A. Pardaev, and I. Abdirakhmonov. Study of the electrical resistance of the components of healthy cotton seeds and those infected with gummosis, ICECAE 2020. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 614 012142 IOP Publishing DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/614/1/012142. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Babayan A.A. 1956 Bulletin of the Academy ofSciences of the Armenian SSR: Plant Protection 8 67–76. [Google Scholar]
  3. Denmukhammadiev A.M. Electric treatment of cotton seeds, Candidate of Science (Engineering).Dissertation work, Moscow. (1992) [Google Scholar]
  4. Denmukhammadiev A.M., Djalilov A.U. and Cho’lliev YaE. Modern methods of statistical processing of experiment results, Monography, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. Wolfgang Hossfeld, Joachim Knittel, Oliver Malki, Frank Przygodda, Hartmut Richter, Heiko Trautner. Shift Selectivity in Common-Aperture Holography, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 46 (6), pp. 3793–3796, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  6. Bhargab Das, Joby Joseph, Kehar Singh, Material saturation in photopolymer holographic data recording and its effects on bit-error-rate and content-addressable search, Optics Communications 282 (2), pp. 177–184. Crossref. (2009) [Google Scholar]
  7. Sami Bellez, Christophe Bourlier, and Gildas Kubické, Efficient propagation-inside-layer expansion algorithm for solving the scattering from three-dimensional nested homogeneous dielectric bodies with arbitrary shape, Journal of the Optical Society of America A., 32 (3), pp. 392–401, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guillem Carles, Gonzalo Muyo, Nicholas Bustin, Andrew Wood, and Andrew R. Harvey Compact multi-aperture imaging with high angular resolution, Journal of the Optical Society of America A., 32 (3), pp. 411–419, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  9. K. Edee and J. P. Plumey, Numerical scheme for the modal method based on subsectional Gegenbauer polynomial expansion: application to biperiodic binary grating, Journal of the Optical Society of America A., 32 (3), pp. 402–410, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. Rajesh Srivastava and Dinshaw N., Efficient evaluation of integrals in threedimensional boundary element method using linear shape functions over plane triangular elements, Contractor Appl. Math. Modelling, 16, June (1992), [Google Scholar]
  11. Po Chen, Thomas H. Jordan and Li Zhao. Full three-dimensional tomography: a comparison between the scattering-integral and adjoint-wavefield methods, The Authors, GJI, 170, pp. 175181 Journal compilation C 2007 RAS [Google Scholar]
  12. Akcelik, V., Biros, G. and Omar, G., Parallel multiscale Gauss-Newton Krylov methods for inverse wave propagation, Proceedings of SC2002, Baltimore. IEEE/ACM. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhao, L., Jordan, T.H. and Chapman, C.H., Three-dimensional Fr’echet differential kernels for seismic delay times, Geophys. J. Int., 141, pp. 58–576, (2000). [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao, L., Jordan, T.H., Olsen, K.B. & Chen, P., Fr’echet kernels for imaging regional Earth structure based on three-dimensional reference models, Bull. Seis. Soc. Am., 95(6), pp. 20662080. (2005). [Google Scholar]
  15. Akcelik, V. et al., High resolution forward and inverse earthquake modeling on terascale computers, SC2003, Phoenix, AZ. (2003). [Google Scholar]
  16. Bilal Mughal and Mark Drela. A calculation method for the three-dimensional boundary-layer equations in integral form, All content following this page was uploaded by Bilal Mughal on 31 May (2014) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.