Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 13
Section New Sustainable Approaches to the Challenges of the Oil and Gas Sector
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126601001
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. Y. Song, Z. Li, L. Jiang, et al. The concept and the accumulation characteristics of unconventional hydrocarbon resources. Pet. Sci. 12, 563–572 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. A. V. Malshakov, I. O. Oshnyakov, E. G. Kuznetsov, et al. Innovative approaches to study heterogeneous anisotropic reservoirs of Turonian deposits for reliable assessment of reservoir properties. OIJ 2016, 18–22 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Adham, Geomechanics model for wellbore stability analysis in field “X” North Sumatra Basin (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado School of Mines) (2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. S. A. Boronin, K. I. Tolmacheva, A. A. Osiptsov, et al. Modelling of Injection Well Capacity with Account for Permeability Damage in the Near-Wellbore Zone for Oil Fields in Western Siberia. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. M.G. Reed, Formation Damage Prevention During Drilling and Completion. SPE Centennial Symposium at New Mexico Tech, Socorro, New Mexico, October 1989. DOI:10.2118/20149-MS (1989). [Google Scholar]
  6. J.P. Davies, & D.K. Davies. Stress-Dependent Permeability: Characterization and Modeling. SPE J. 6, 224–235 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  7. Fatt, I.. & D.H. Davis. Reduction in Permeability With Overburden Pressure. J Pet Technol. 4, 16. (1952) [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Liu, G. Yin, Li, M. et al. Anisotropic Mechanical Properties and the Permeability Evolution of Cubic Coal Under True Triaxial Stress Paths. Rock Mech Rock Eng. 52, 2505–2521 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. G. Ashikhmin, S. E. Chernyshov, Y. Kashnikov, D.I.M. Macdonald, A geomechanical analysis of the influence of orientation and placement of jet slots on terrigenous reservoir permeability (Russian). OIJ, 132–135 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  10. B. Baizhanov, D. Katsuki, A.N. Tutuncu, et al. Experimental Investigation of Coupled Geomechanical, Acoustic, and Permeability Characterization of Berea Sandstone Using a Novel True Triaxial Assembly. RockMech Rock Eng. 52, 2491–2503 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. R.M. Holt, Permeability Reduction Induced by a Nonhydrostatic Stress Field. SPE Formation Evaluation 5(04), 444–448 (1990). [Google Scholar]
  12. W. Hu, Wei, Y., Bao, J.. Development of the theory and technology for low permeability reservoirs in China. Petroleum Exploration and Development 45(4), 685–697 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. Q. Jia, Liu, D., Cai, Y. et al. Petrophysics characteristics of coalbed methane reservoir: a comprehensive review. Front. Earth Sci (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. M.H.B. Nasseri, R.P. Young. Laboratory Triaxial and Permeability Tests on Tournemire Shale and Cobourg Limestone. FINAL REPORT, University of Toronto Rock Fracture Dynamics Facility (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Yang, Hu, B.. Creep and permeability evolution behavior of red sandstone containing a single fissure under a confining pressure of 30 MPa. Sci Rep 10, 1900 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. T. S. Nguyen, Li, Z., Su, G., et al. Hydro-mechanical behavior of an argillaceous limestone considered as a potential host formation for radioactive waste disposal. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 10(6), 1063–1081 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  17. M.V. Bukatov, Peskova D.N., Nenasheva M.G., et al. Key problems of achimov deposits development on the different scales of studying. Professionals o nefti. 2(8), 16–21 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  18. D. Zolnikov, Astafyev, V., Eltsov, I. et al. Massive Hydraulic Fracturing Using Linear Pads in the Achimov Reservoirs at the Urengoy Field. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  19. P.P. Povzhik, Serdyukov D.V., Galai M.I., et al. Increasing ORF in depleted deposits with low formation pressure. Business journal NEFTEGAZ.RU. 6, 64–68 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  20. Karev, V.I. et al. Geomechanics of Oil and Gas Wells. Advances in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production. Springer International Publishing Cham: Switzerland (2020). [Google Scholar]
  21. Lekhnitskii, S. G., Theory of Elasticity for Anisotropic Bodies. Moscow: Nauka (1977). [Google Scholar]
  22. V. I. Karev, & Kovalenko, Y.F. Prospects for the application of the geomechanical approach for the development of fields with low-permeability reservoirs. Processes in geomedia 2(24), 675–683 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Maleki, Pouya, A.. Numerical simulation of damage-Permeability relationship in brittle geomaterials. Computers and Geotechnics 37(5), 619–628 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  24. T. Jiang, Shao, J. F., Xu, W. Y., Zhou, C. B.. Experimental investigation and micromechanical analysis of damage and permeability variation in brittle rocks. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 47(5), 703–713 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  25. A.V. Kosterin, et al. Stress-strain state of rocks and filtration in heterogeneous formations. Computational technologies 4(2), 42–50 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  26. N. Mohammad, Antonin S. and Wan R.. Prediction and optimization of fracturing in tight gas and shale using a coupled geomechanical model of combined tensile and shear fracturing. SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. J.-Q. Shi, Durucan, S.. Exponential growth in san juan basin fruitland coalbed permeability with reservoir drawdown-model match and new insights. SPE Rocky Mountain Petroleum Technology Conference (2009) [Google Scholar]
  28. A. O. Suvorov. Directional unloading method. Meeting new challenges: global knowledge: collection of articles: materials of the VI All-Russian. stud. scientific-practical conf, 233 (2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.