Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 01014
Number of page(s) 12
Section New Sustainable Approaches to the Challenges of the Oil and Gas Sector
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126601014
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. O. Andreyev, K. Basniev, L. Berman, Features of exploration and development of gas deposits in Western Siberia. (Nedra, 1984). [Google Scholar]
  2. P.S. Kolmakov, A.V. Krotov, Kononov. Technologies for developing Cenomanian deposits oflow-pressure gas. (Nedra, 2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. V.Z. Minlikaev, A.V. Kovalenko, N.A. Bilalov, A.V. Elistratov, Results of the implementation of Comprehensive program on the reconstruction and technical reequipment of gas recovery facilities for 2011-2015. Gas Industry 1(747): 30–34 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Zhu, G. Cao, W. Tian, Q. Zhao, H. Zhu, J. Song, J. Peng, Z. Lin, H.-Q. Zhang, Improved Data Mining for Production Diagnosis of Gas Wells with Plunger Lift through Dynamic Simulations. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in Calgary, Alberta, Canada (2019). [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Shi, X. Wu, G. Han, Z. Zhong, Study on the gas-liquid annular vortex flow for liquid unloading of gas well. Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 82 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Dallagi, A.A. Saabi, C. Faille, T. Benezech, & Aloui, F.. Augustin, CFD Simultions of the Rheological Behavior of Aqueous Foam Flow Through a HalfSudden Expansion. 8thJoint Fluids Engineering Conference (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Amania, S. Hurterbc, V. Rudolpha, M. Firouzi, Comparison of flow dynamics of air-water flows with foam flows in vertical pipes. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 119 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Khamehchi, M. Khishvand, H. Abdolhosseini, A case study to an optimum selection of d liquification method for gas condensate well design: South Pars gas field. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 7(2): 847–853 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Saradva, S. Jain, M.A. Hamadi, K.K. Thakur, G. Govindan, A.F. Ahmed, Evaluating Liquid Loading Using Multiphase Dynamic Flow Simulation in Complex Openhole Multilateral Gas Condensate Wells. SPE Middle East Oil and Gas Show and Conference. (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Burns, Plunger-Assisted Gas Lift and Gas-Assisted Plunger Lift. SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition-Americas. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  11. M.C. Romer, M. Brown, N. Ainsworth, O. Rundberg, D.J. Bolt, T. Bolt, R.C. Tolman, Field Trial of a Novel Self-Reciprocating Hydraulic Pump for Deliquification. SPE North America Atificial Lift Conference and Exhibition. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Burford, G. Falcone, Deliquification in a Mature Gas Field: Comparison of Predicted and Oserved Rates after Well Workover to Install Velocity Strings. SPE Latin America and Caribbean Petrleum Engineering Conference. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  13. Natural Gas STAR Partners. Options for Removing Accumulated Fluid and Improving Flow in Gas Wells. (United States Environmental Protection Agency Air and Radiation, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. A.Y. Koryakin, Complex solutions of problems of development and operation of wells of the Urengoy producing complex. (M. 2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. S.A. Kalwar, A.Q. Awan, A.U. Rehman, H.S. Abbasi, Production Optimization of High Temperature Liquid Hold-Up Gas Well Using Capillary Surfactant Injection. SPEMiddle East Oil & Gas Show and Conference. (2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. O. Rauf, Gas Well Deliquification-A Brief Comparison between Foam Squeeze and Foam Batch Approach. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information, 3(1): 45–47 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  17. H.P. Sean, L.N. Shona, C. Krevor, Investigation of Batch Foamer Efficacy and Optimisation in North Sea Gas Condensate Wells. (SPE Candidate Paper. 2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. W. Schinagl, M. Caskie, S.R. Green, M. Docherty, A.C. Hodds, Most Successful Batch Aplication of Surfactant in North Sea Gas Wells. (Offshore Europe, 2007). [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Huang, D. Nguyen, Optimized foamers for natural gas well deliquification: a statistical d sign approach. Fuel 97: 523–530 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Alzhanov, H. Karami, E. Pereyra, J. Gamboa, Efficacy of Surfactants in Rich Gas Shale Wells. SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition-Amercas. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  21. C. Gcali, H. Karami, E. Pereyra, C. Sarica, Surfactant Batch Treatment Efficiency as an Atificial Lift Method for Horizontal Gas Wells. SPE Artificial Lift Conference and Exhibition-Amercas. (2018). [Google Scholar]
  22. P.S. Omrani, R.K. Shukla, F. Vercauteren, E. Nennie, Towards a Better Selection of Foamers for the Deliquification of Mature Gas Wells. International Petroleum Technology Conference. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Liu, X. Zhou, H. Chen, G. Lu, Z. Zhao, D. Liu, Y. Duo, Popularization and application of the capillary foam deliquification technology in horizontal wells with low pressures and low liquid flow rates: A case study on middle shallow gas reservoirs in the Western Sichuan depression. Natural Gas Industry B, 6, 25–33 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Kelkar, C. Sarica, Gas Well Pressure Drop Prediction under Foam Flow Conditions. (RPSEA 09122-01 Final Report, 2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. N. Politova, S. Tcholakova, Z. Valkova, K. Golemanov, N.D. Denkov, Self-regulation of foam volume and bubble size during foaming via shear mixing. Colloids Surfaces: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018; 539: 18–28 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. M.V. Turitsyna, A review of the results of research on solutions of surfactants and gasliquid mixtures based on them. Modern problems of science and education 2: 271, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. R. Turner, M. Hubbard, A. Dukler, Analysis and prediction of minimum flow rate for the co tinuous removal of liquids from gas wells. Journal of Petroleum 22 (11), 1475–1482 (1969) [Google Scholar]
  28. H. Nakahara, O. Shibata, Y. Moroi, Examination of Surface Adsorpshion of Cetyltrim thylammonium Bromide and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate. J. Phys. Chem. B, 115: 90779086 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  29. B. Petkova, S. Tcholakova, M. Chenkova, K. Golemanov, N. Denkov, D. Thorley, S. Stoyanov, Foamability of aqueous solutions: Role of surfactant type and concentration, Advances in colloid and interface science, 276, 102084 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  30. A.V. Koshelev, G.S. Li, M.A. Kataeva, Operational hydrochemical control of reservoir water flooding of Urengoy oil and gas condensate field development facilities. Scientific and technical colection. Vesti Gazovoy Nauki, 3(19): 106–115. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  31. G.E. Odishariya, A.A. Tochigin, Applied hydrodynamics of gas-liquid mixtures. (VNIIGAZ, 1998). [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Szabries, P.T. Jaeger, M.M. Amro, Foam analysis at elevated pressures for EOR applictions. Energy & Fuels 33(5): 3743–3752 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Karnanda, M.S. Benzagouta, A. AlQuraishi, M. M. Amro, Effect of temperature, pressure, salinity, and surfactant concentration on IFT for surfactant flooding optimization. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(9), 3535–3544 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  34. J.M.C. Westende, R.A.W.M. Henkes, A. Ajani, M. Kelkar, The use of surfactants for gas well deliquification: a comparison of research projects and developed models. (BHR Group, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  35. A.T. Van Nimwegen, L.M. Portela, R.A.W.M. Henkes, Modeling of upwards gasliquid annular and churn flow with surfactants in vertical pipes. International Journal of Multiphase Flow: 105, 1–14 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Joshi, Foamer evaluation by the sparging test method for application to gas well deliquifiction. The dissertation on competition of a scientific degree of Cand. Tech. Sci. (Delft University of Technology, 2015). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.