EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 266 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 266 (2021) 06005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 06005
Number of page(s) 10
Section Economics of Sustainability and Global Investment Trends
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126606005
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. J. Speight, Subsea and Deepwater Oil and Gas, Science and Technology, 560 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Vasiliev, Underwater Arctic Shelf Development Technologies, Pro-acrtic, viewed February 2016. Available at: http://pro-arctic.ru/29/03/2016/technology/20833.) [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Lugai, M. Mansurov, Evolution in subsea oil and gas, Gas industry, 6, 769 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Samsonov, et al., The main directions of science and technology in the field of offshore development using underwater hydrocarbon production technologies, Science and technology in the gas industry, 4(31), 44–52 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  5. V. Karpunina, Subsea technology: a methodology for modeling subsea hydrocarbon production systems. Collection of articles on the materials of the III international scientific and practical conference, Actual issues of modern science, 9–18 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. I. Karaev, Choice and justification of the concept of arranging oil and gas fields on the shallow shelf of the Arctic (using the fields of the Ob and Taz Bay and the Priyamalsky shelf as an example): a dissertation for the degree of a candidate of engineering. Sciences, Gazprom VNIIGAZ LLC, Moscow, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Henriksen, AastaHansteen Offshore Marine Operations - Deep, Remote and Harsh; Proc. Offshore Technology Conference. (Houston. Texas. OTC-29350-MS, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  8. Y. Bai, Q. Bai, Subsea Engineering, Handbook: Edition 2 / Gulf Professional Publishing, 968 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  9. J.H. Woo, et al., Development of a simulation method for the subsea production system, Journal of Computational Design and Engineering 1(3), 73–186 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Lindseth, et al., AastaHansteen Subsea Production System for Deep Water and Harsh Environment; Proc. Offshore Technology Conference. Houston. Texas. OTC-29561-MS (2019). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Theobald, et al., Challenges in Oil and Gas Subsea Production Systems: Control, Monitoring, and Reliability - An Introduction, Measurement and Control -London- Institute of Measurement and Control 44(7), 206–207 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. ISO 13628-6:2006 Petroleum and natural gas industries - Design and operation of subsea production systems - Part 6: Subsea production control systems. [Google Scholar]
  13. X. Zhang, et al., A mathematical model of virtual simulation for deepwater installation of subsea production facilities. Ships Offshore Struct. 12, 182–195 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  14. S.K. Bhattacharyya, A.S. Cheliyan, Optimization of a subsea production system for cost and reliability using its fault tree model, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 185, 213–219 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  15. G.A. Potasheva, Project Management, (Textbook - M.: Infra-M, 288, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  16. API RP 17N Recommended Practice for Subsea Production System Reliability and Technical Risk Management, viewed 01.06.2018. Available at: http://nd.gostinfo.ru/document/4523527.aspx) [Google Scholar]
  17. A.Y. Nikulina, M.N. Kruk, Organizational and Economic Mechanism of Oil and Gas Projects in the Russian Arctic Shelf, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 6(21), 2–12 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. A.E. Cherepovitsyn, et al., Prospects for the exploration of hydrocarbon deposits in the Arctic based on socio-economic evaluation, International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(13), 938–948 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. Order dated 14.06.2016 “On approval of the Rules for the development of hydrocarbon deposits” as amended on September 20, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  20. Order No. 477 of 01.02.2016 “On approval of guidelines for the application of the classification of reserves and resources of oil and combustible gases,” approved by order of the Ministry Natural Resources and Environmentof the Russian Federation dated 01.11.2013. [Google Scholar]
  21. A.A. Ilinova, A.F. Chanysheva, Algorithm for assessing the prospects of offshore oil and gas projects in the Arctic, Energy Reports, 6(2), 504–509 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Shcherban, et al., Optimization of Technical and Technological Solutions for the Development of Offshore Hydrocarbon Fields in the Kaliningrad Region, International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences, 12(10) (2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. S.A. Berezikov, Structural changes and innovation economic development of the Arctic regions of Russia, Journal of Mining Institute, 240, 716–723 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. A.A. Ilinova, D.M. Dmitrieva, The mechanismof innovative developmentof the Russian Arctic zone, International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 9(9), 1439–1451 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Ehlakov, Software project management, (Standards, Models: Study Guide - Saint-Petersburg: Lan 2019) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.