EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 266 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 266 (2021) 06009 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 06009
Number of page(s) 9
Section Economics of Sustainability and Global Investment Trends
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126606009
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. V.V. Butvilovsky, About the realities of “sustainable development”, Altai: Proceedings of the Al-Thai Branch of the Russian Geographical Society, 2(53), 5–6 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  2. P.M. Kaznacheyev, Natural rent and economic growth, (St. Petersburg: Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation 2013). [Google Scholar]
  3. V.V. Yurak, A.V. Dushin, L.A. Mochalova, Protiv ustojchivogo razvitiya: scenario budushchego, Zapiski Gornogo Instituta, 242, 242–247 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. N. Weitz, H. Carlsen, M. Nilsson, K. Skonberg, Towards a systematic and contextual setting of priorities for implementing the 2030 agenda, Science of Sustainability, 13(2), 531–548 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. D.D. Moyer, B. Brooke, Alternative Ways to Develop Human Potential: Assessing Trade-offs and Synergies in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals. Futures 105, 199–210 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Ponomarenko, M. Nevskaya, O. Marinina, An Assessment of the Applicability of Sustainability Measurement Tools to Resource-Based Economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States, Sustainability, 12, 5582 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. Global Footprint Network, 2018. [Official site] Available at: http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/ (date of request: 13.02.2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Tsvetkova, E. Katysheva, Ecological and economic efficiency evaluation of sustainable use of mineral raw materials in modern conditions Ecological and economic efficiency evaluation of sustainable use of mineral raw materials in modern conditions. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management. SGEM 2017, 17(53), 259–266 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. World Economic Forum, 2018. [Official site] Available at: http://reports.weforum.org (date of request: 17.05.2020) [Google Scholar]
  10. The Imperative of Social Progress, 2018. [Official site] Available at: https://www.socialprogress.org/ (date of request: 13.02.2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. Michael E. Porter, S. Stern, M. Green, Social Progress Index, (Washington: The imperative of social progress 2017). [Google Scholar]
  12. New Economic Fund, 2018. [Official site] Available at: http://happyplanetindex.org/) (date of request: 15.02.2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. World Data Atlas, 2018. [Official site] Available at https://knoema.ru/atlas/) (date of request: 25.04.2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Cherepovitsyn, A. Ilinova, Ecological, economic and social issues of implementing carbon dioxide sequestration technologies in the oil and gas industry in Russia, Journal of Ecological Engineering, 17(2), 19–23 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  15. United Nations Development Program (UNDP), 2018. [Official site] Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/ (date or request: 10.03.2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. Bertelsman Foundation, 2018. [Official site] Available at: http://www.bti-project.org/index (date of request: 25.04.2020) [Google Scholar]
  17. LEGATUM Institute, 2018. [Official site] Available at: https://www.prosperity.com/ (date of request: 13.02.2020) [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Lu, N. Nakichenovich, M. Visbek, A.C. Stevans, Politics: Five Priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals - Comment. Nature 520(7548), 432–433 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  19. V.S. Litvinenko, The social and market mechanism of sustainable development of public companies in the mineral resource sector, Eurasian Mining, (2020). DOI: 10.17580/em.2020.01.07 [Google Scholar]
  20. O.A. Nesterova, O.V. Pozharnitskaya, Assessment of wealth from a position of sustainable human development: the possibilities of international indices, Issues of innovative economics, 3, 336–346 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Carayannis, A. Cherepovitsyn, A. Ilinova, Sustainable Development of the Russian Arctic zone energy shelf: the Role of the Quintuple Innovation Helix Model, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(2), 456–470 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. O. Marinina, Analysis of trends and performance of CSR mining companies, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 302(1), 1–7 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Christian, A. Warhold, P. Pradhan, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): have we managed to turn trade-offs into synergies?, (Germany: Palgrave Commun 2019). [Google Scholar]
  24. D. Vaaj, C. Yap, S. Bell, C. Levy, D. Mays, T. Pegram, S. Mayhew, Managing the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Collaboration, Infrastructure, and Institutions, The Lancet Global Health, 3, 251–252 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. Little Green Book. The level of economic development. [Official site] Available at: https://www.littlegreenbook.co.uk/ (date of request: 21.04.2020) (2020) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.