Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 266, 2021
Topical Issues of Rational Use of Natural Resources 2021
Article Number 06010
Number of page(s) 8
Section Economics of Sustainability and Global Investment Trends
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126606010
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. V. Litvinenko The Role of Hydrocarbons in the Global Energy Agenda: The Focus on Liquefied Natural Gas, Resources, 9, 59 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3390/resources9050059 [Google Scholar]
  2. P.S. Tsvetkov, S.V. Fedoseev Analysis of project organization specifics in small-scale LNG production, Journal of Mining Institute, 246, 678–686 (2021) https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2020.6.10 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Tcvetkov, A. Cherepovitsyn, A. Makhovikov Economic assessment of heat and power generation from small-scale liquefied natural gas in Russia, Energy Reports, 6, 391–402 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.egyr.2019.1L093 [Google Scholar]
  4. V.S. Litvinenko Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector, Natural Resources Research, 3(29), 1521–1541 (2020) DOI: 10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4 [Google Scholar]
  5. C.J. Cleveland, R.K. Kaufmann, D.I. Stern Aggregation and the role of energy in the economy, Ecological Economics, 32(2), 301–317 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  6. B.W. Ang, W.L. Choong, T.S. Ng Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 42, 1077–1093 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Gasparatos, A. Scolobig Choosing the most appropriate sustainability assessment tool, Ecological Economics, 80, 1–7 (2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kumar, B. Sah, A.R. Singh, Y. Deng, X. He, P. Kumar, R.C. Bansal A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 596–609 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  9. J.J. Wang, Y.Y. Jing, C.F. Zhang, J.H. Zhao Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making, Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 13(9), 2263–2278 (2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Ren, M. Lützen Selection of sustainable alternative energy source for shipping: Multi-criteria decision making under incomplete information, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74, 1003–1019 (2017) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.057 [Google Scholar]
  11. A.L. Dahl Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability, Ecological indicators, 17, 14–19 (2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.032 [Google Scholar]
  12. A.E. Cherepovitsyn, F.D. Larichkin, A.G. Vorobiev et al. Economical prospects of advancement in liquefied natural gas production, Gornyi Zhurnal, 2, 59–64 (2018) DOI: 10.17580/gzh.2018.02.09 [Google Scholar]
  13. E.G. Katysheva Developing Gas Fields in the Yamal Peninsula as a Factor of Economic Development of the Arctic Zone of Russia, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1(302) (2019) DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012127 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.