Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 267, 2021
7th International Conference on Energy Science and Chemical Engineering (ICESCE 2021)
Article Number 02072
Number of page(s) 4
Section Environmental Chemistry Research and Chemical Preparation Process
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126702072
Published online 04 June 2021
  1. Zhang, Y., Miao, J., Han, L.X. (2019) Optimizing Clothing Supporting High Temperature operation [J]. Journal of Nantong Vocational University. 33(03):59–62. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu, L., Zhang, S.H., Cai, P.N., Li, S.X., Chen, Z.T. (2019) Development of Flame Retardant Viscose Wool Blend for Preventing Molten Metal Splash [J]. Cotton Textile Technology. 47(11):29–32. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, T.T., Ren, Z.B., Xu, L.J., Dong, B.Y., Zhang, H. (2019) Problems in Testing of Thermal Protection Performance of Flame Retardant Protective Clothing [J]. Wool Textile Science and Technology. 47(11):69–71. [Google Scholar]
  4. Han, Y. (2019) Study on Flame Retardant Chemical Protective Clothing [J]. Labor Protection. (11):14-15. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu, Z.T., Zheng, X.H., Feng, M.M., Wang, Y.J., Li, L., Ding, S.T. (2019) Influence of Air Layer on Thermal Resistance and Moisture Resistance of Air-permeable Protective Clothing [J]. Journal of Textile Research. 40(11):145–150. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sadeghi M., Yekta S., Ghaedi H. (2016) Decontamination of chemical warfare sulfur mustard agent simulant by ZnO nanoparticles [J]. Int Nano Lett. 6:161–171. [Google Scholar]
  7. Paukku Y., Michalkova A., Leszczynski J. (2008) Adsorption of dimethyl methylphosphonate and trimethyl phosphate on calcium oxide: An ab initio study [J]. Struct Chem. 19: 307–320. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gershonov E., Columbus I., Zafrani Y. (2008) Facile hydrolysis-based chemical destruction of the warfare agents VX, GB, and HD by alumina-supported fluoride reagents [J]. J. Org. Chem. 74: 329–338. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhu, L.J., Fu, J., Chun, H. (2019) Design of Safe and Comfortable Protective Clothing [J]. Labor Protection, (11):101. [Google Scholar]
  10. Yao, W.C., Fu, Y.H., Jiang, J.X. (2019) Mathematical Model of Special Clothing Supporting High Temperature Operation [J]. Electronic Testing, (Z1):63-65. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sayago I., Matatagui D., Ferna´ ndez M.J. (2016) Graphene oxide as sensitive layer in Love-wave surface acoustic wave sensors for the detection of chemical warfare agent simulants [J]. Talanta. 148: 393–400. [Google Scholar]
  12. Shen, Y., Yue, M.G., Bao, W.L. (2019) Study on the Optimal Design of Special Protective Clothing for High Temperature Operation Based on Multi-layer Plane Wall Heat Conduction Model [J]. Chemical Management. 2:104–105. [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu, J., Sun, Y.R. (2018) Development and Prospect of Laboratory Biosafety Protective Equipment in China [J]. China Public Health. 34(12):1700–1704. [Google Scholar]
  14. Eigler, S., Dotzer, C., Hof, F. (2013) Sulfur species in graphene oxide [J]. Chem Eur J. 19:9490–9496. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, X.Y., Tian, L., Wang, G.H., Xu Z.G. (2012) Solution to Heat Load Caused by Heavy Chemical Protective Clothing [J]. Fire Science and Technology. 31(01):5–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, G.M., Wang J., Yang, M. (2011) Chemical Protective Clothing[J]. Life and Disaster. 06:1. [Google Scholar]
  17. He, Z.Y. (2011) Discussion on Responses to Chemical Accidents by Fire Brigade Using Thiourea Pyrolysis [J]. Fire Science and Technology. 30(03):243–245. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, K.Z. (2011) Development of Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) for Outer Fabric of Chemical Protective Clothing [D]. Shanghai: Donghua University. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, Y., Liu, M., Wang, X.D. (2010) Classification and Selection of Chemical Protective Clothing [J]. Personal Protective Equipment in China. 01:32–37. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.