Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 271, 2021
2021 2nd International Academic Conference on Energy Conservation, Environmental Protection and Energy Science (ICEPE 2021)
Article Number 03003
Number of page(s) 4
Section Research on Energy Chemistry and Chemical Simulation Performance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127103003
Published online 15 June 2021
  1. M. Liu, Y. Chen, D. Wang, Y. Zhou, and L. Quan, “Clinical Outcomes After SMILE and Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study,” Cornea, vol. 35(2): P 210 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Mathew, et al., “In Vivo Prediction of Air-Puff Induced Corneal Deformation Using LASIK, SMILE, and PRK Finite Element Simulations,” Invest Ophth Vis Sci, vol. 59(13): P 5320–5328 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. B. Pedersen, S. Bak-Nielsen, A.H. Vestergaard, A. Ivarsen, and J. Hjortdal, “Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry,” Graef Arch Clin Exp, vol. 252(8): P 1329–1335 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. I. Simonini and A. Pandolfi, “The influence of intraocular pressure and air jet pressure on corneal contactless tonometry tests,” J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, vol. 58(1):P 75–89 (2016). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Sullivan-Mee, G. Gerhardt, K.D. Halverson, and C. Qualls, “Repeatability and reproducibility for intraocular pressure measurement by dynamic contour, ocular response analyzer, and goldmann applanation tonometry,” J Glaucoma, vol. 18(9): P 666–673 (2009). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Ramm, R. Herber, E. Spoerl, F. Raiskup, and N. Terai, “Intraocular Pressure Measurement Using Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometer, and Scheimpflug Analyzer Corvis ST,” J Ophth, vol. 2019(6): P 1–9 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Am, B. Ma, and A. Ap, “A 3D fluid-solid interaction model of the air puff test in the human cornea,” JMech Behav Biomed, vol. 94(1): P 22–31 (2019). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Y. Woo, A. S. Kobayashi, W. A. Schlegel, and C. Lawrence, “Nonlinear material properties of intact cornea and sclera,” Exp Eye Res, vol. 14(1): P 29–39 (1972). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. J. G. Yu, F. J. Bao, Y. F. Feng, C. Whitford, and A. Elsheikh, “Assessment of corneal biomechanical behavior under posterior and anterior pressure,” J Refract Surg, vol. 29(1): P 64–70 (2013). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Montanino, M. Angelillo, and A. Pandolfi, “Modelling with a meshfree approach the cornea-aqueous humor interaction during the air puff test,” (in eng), J mech behav of biomed, vol. 77(1): P 205–216 (2018). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Han, et al., “Air Puff Induced Corneal Vibrations: Theoretical Simulations and Clinical Observations,” J Refract Surg, vol. 30(3): P 208 (2014). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Vojnikovi and E. Tamajo, “Gullstrand's optical schematic system of the eye--modified by Vojnikovi & Tamajo,” CollAntropol, vol. 37 (Suppl 1): P 41–45 (2013). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.