Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 271, 2021
2021 2nd International Academic Conference on Energy Conservation, Environmental Protection and Energy Science (ICEPE 2021)
Article Number 03045
Number of page(s) 4
Section Research on Energy Chemistry and Chemical Simulation Performance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127103045
Published online 15 June 2021
  1. Xu, X., S. Li, Y. Xu, and J. Wei, Prevalence of myopia among primary school students in mainland China: a Meta-analysis. Guoji Yanke Zazhi: p. 1221–1227. [2016]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim, A. and R. S. Chuck, Wavefront-guided customized corneal ablation. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 19(4): p. 314–320. [2008]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Abhijit, Sinha, Roy, William, J., Dupps, et al., Comparison of biomechanical effects of smallincision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: Finite-element analysis. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery: p. 971–80. [2014]. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cao, K., L. Liu, T. Yu, F. Chen, J. Bai, and T. Liu, Changes in corneal biomechanics during smallincision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK). Lasers in Medical Science, 35(3): p. 599–609. [2020]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guo, H., S. M. Hosseini-Moghaddam, and W. Hodge, Corneal biomechanical properties after SMILE versus FLEX, LASIK, LASEK, or PRK: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmology, 19(1): p. 167. [2019]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Osman, I. M., H. A. Helaly, M. Abdalla, and M. A. Shousha, Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis. BMC Ophthalmology, 16(1): p. 123–123. [2016]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dan, Z. R., T. J. Archer, and J. B. Randleman, Mathematical Model to Compare the Relative Tensile Strength of the Cornea After PRK, LASIK, and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 29(7): p. 454–460. [2013]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Yueguo, C., Paying more attention on the effects of excimer laser corneal refractive surgeries on the corneal biomechanical integrality. Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology, 13(1): p. 577–579. [2011]. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, F., X. Cao, N. Wang, and X. Chen, The research progress of finite element analysis in ophthalmology. Chinese Journal of Ocular trauma and occupational Eye Diseases 040(006): p. 477–480. [2018]. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kaluzhny, Y. and M. Klausner, In vitro reconstructed 3D corneal tissue models for ocular toxicology and ophthalmic drug development. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal, 57(2): p. 207–237. [2021]. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Asher, R., A. Gefen, and D. Varssano, PatientSpecific Modeling of the Cornea, in Patient-Specific Modeling in Tomorrow's Medicine, A. Gefen, Editor. [2012], Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 461–483. [Google Scholar]
  12. Cui, Y.-H., J.-F. Huang, S.-Y. Cheng, W. Wei, L. Shang, N. Li, et al., Study on establishment and mechanics application of finite element model of bovine eye. BMC Ophthalmology, 15(1): p. 101. [2015]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moshirfar, M., M. S. Murri, T. J. Shah, S. H. Linn, Y. Ronquillo, O. C. Birdsong, et al., Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK. Ophthalmology and Therapy, 7(2): p. 347–360. [2018]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ang, M., D. Tan, and J. S. Mehta, Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials, 13(1): p. 75. [2012]. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.