EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 09012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 09012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Innovative and Smart Technologies in Architectural and Construction Education
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127409012
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. J. Dron. Smart learning environments, and not so smart learning environments: systems view. Smart Learn. Environ 5, 25 (2018). DOI: 10.1186/s40561-018-0075-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Gustafsson. Understanding the persistence of history-related issues in Sino-Japanese relations: from memory to forgetting. Int Polit International Politics (2020). ). DOI: 10.1057/s41311-020-00219-7. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Bermudez Haste, M. Carretero, S. Berger, M. Grever. The power of story: Historical narratives and the construction of civic identity, Palgrave handbook of research in historical culture and education, Palgrave Macmillan UK, London, England, 427–447 (2017). DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yannis Hadzigeorgiou, Roland M. Schulz. Engaging Students in Science: The Potential Role of «Narrative Thinking» and «Romantic Understanding», Frontiers in Education, (2019). DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00038. [Google Scholar]
  5. O.G. Khripunova, A.A. Polyarush, E.V. Selivanova, E.V. Luneva. Undergraduate students ’ value orientations: Gender characteristics, Science for education today 5, (9), 24–35 (2019). DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1905.02. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K.J. Pugh, C.M. Bergstrom, B. Spencer. Profiles of transformative engagement: Identification, description, and relation to learning and instruction. Science Education 101, 369–398 (2017). DOI: 10.1002/sce.21270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. D. Cunningham, L. Deborah. Understanding Pedagogical Reasoning in History Teaching through the Case of Cultivating Historical Empathy, Theory and Research in Social Education 35, (4), 592–630 (2007). DOI: 10.1080/00933104.2007.10473352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Kervinen, W. Roth, K. Juuti. The resurgence of everyday experiences in school science learning activities. Cult Stud of Sci Educ. (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s11422-019-09968-1. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen N. Kinshuk, I. Cheng. Evolution Is not enough: Revolutionizing Current Learning Environments to Smart Learning Environments, Int J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26, 561–581 (2016). DOI: 10.1007/s40593-016-0108-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F.V. Nikolai, A.A. Mordvinov. «The Concept of «Courage» in Memories of Veterans of Local Wars: The Intersection of Oral History and Phenomenology of the Front-line Experience», Modern History of Russia 9, (2), 515–525 (2019). DOI: 10.21638/11701/spbu24.2019.213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Z. Zhu, M. Yu, P. Riezebos. A research framework of smart education, Smart Learn. Environ 3, 4 (2016). DOI: 10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Blevins, K. Magill, C. Salinas. Critical historical inquiry: The intersection of ideological clarity and pedagogical content knowledge, The Journal of Social Studies Research 44, (1), 35–50 (2020). DOI: 10.1016/jjssr.2019.09.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Blevins, C. Salinas, T. Talbert. Critical historical thinking: Enacting the voice of the other in the social studies curriculum and classroom, Critical qualitative research in social education, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, 71–90 (2015). DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3967.7285. [Google Scholar]
  14. M.G. Nikitskaya, N.N. Tolstykh. Foreign studies of learning motivation: XXI century, Journal of Modern Foreign 7, (2), 100–113 (2018). DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2018070210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lévesque Stéphane, Nicholas Ng-A-Fook, Julie Corrigan. What Does the Eye See? Reading Online Primary Source Photographs in History, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 14 (2), (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. L.I. Rostovtseva, M.L. Gel’fond, E.Y. Miroshina. Patriotic education in experts and senior pupils’ eyes. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya 8, 75–83 (2019). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250006163-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Harris Lauren McArthur, Halvorsen Anne-Lise, Aponte-Martinez Gerardo J. «[My] family has gone through that»: How high school students determine the trustworthiness of historical documents, Journal of Social Studies Research 40, (2), 109–121 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.jssr.2015.06.007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. O.N. Cationov, A.O. Cationova, B.O. Mayer. Literary stories by military writers in the moral education of modern youth, Science for Education Today 1.9 (6), 107–120. DOI: 10.15293/2658-6762.1906.07. [Google Scholar]
  19. I.A. Khaliy. Patriotism in the Russian: typology. Sociological Studies 2, 67–74 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. S.A. Magaril. Meanings of Patriotism - Historical Transformation, Sociological Studies 1, 142–151 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. M.S. Mikhailov, N.A. Mukhinova. «How do not I remember…»: the history of the Great Patriotic War in the history of one family, Gumanitarnyye nauki v XXI veke 8, 47–52 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  22. E.V. Bureeva. Student scientific project «Sovremennik» as a way to increase interest in studyinc history in modern youth, Baltic Humanitarian Journal 1, (34), 43–45 (2021). DOI: 10.26140/bgz3-2021-1001-0009. [Google Scholar]
  23. Laila Yarullina, IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater.Sci.Eng. 890, 012171 (2020). DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012171. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.