EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 274 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 274 (2021) 12005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 274, 2021
2nd International Scientific Conference on Socio-Technical Construction and Civil Engineering (STCCE – 2021)
Article Number 12005
Number of page(s) 9
Section The Language of Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127412005
Published online 18 June 2021
  1. A.V. Spirov, E.M. Myasnikova, Linguistic modeling of gene regulation: Tradition from the language of experiments to the language of modeling, ICT Express 5(3) 182–186 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Khudanpur, Putting language back into language modeling, Spoken Lang. Reco. Understanding (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Rosenfeld, Two decades of statistical language modeling: Where do we go from here, Spoken Lang. Reco. Understanding (2000) [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Hoffmann, T. Burner, J. Horsch, English comparative correlative constructions: A usage-based account, Open Linguistics 6 (1) (2020) [Google Scholar]
  5. A Katherine, Effects of corpus-based instruction on phraseology in learner English, Language Learning and Teaching 21(3), 195–216 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Kamali, Typology of scaffolding in teacher discourse: Large data based evidence from second language classrooms, International Journal of Applied, 30(2), 329–343 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Nowruzi, J. Kamali, The instruction of meta-cognitive listening strategies and its impact on listening performance of high and low-test-anxious intermediate learners, Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 2(1), 15–40 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Goldberg, Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language, TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224 (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Hoffmann, English Comparative Correlatives: Diachronic and Synchronic Variation at the Lexicon - Syntax Interface (Studies in English Language, Cambridge University Press, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Davila-Montes, Enthymeme, metonymy and method: comparing genre-bound rhetorical deviations between languages through corpus studies, Language and Intercultural Communication 19(5), 407–420 (2019) DOI: 10.1080/14708477.2018.1545779 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Rodriguez-Puente, The English phrasal verb, 1650 - present: History, stylistic drifts, and lexicalisation (Studies in English Language), (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 316–321, 2019). DOI: 10.1017/9781316182147 [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Kim, English comparative correlative construction: interactions between lexicon and constructions, Korean Journal of Linguistics, 36(2), 307 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. T. Breban, Proper names used as modifiers: A comprehensive functional analysis, English Language and Linguistics, 22(3), 381–401 (2018) DOI: 10.1017/S1360674316000514 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. Breeze, Corpora and computation in teaching law and language, International Journal of Language & Law, 6(1-7) (2017) DOI: 10.14762/jll.2017.001 [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Szmrecsanyi, B. Douglas, E. Jesse, F. Karlien, Toward more accountability: Modeling ternary genitive variation in Late Modern English, Language Variation and Change, 28(1), 1–29 (2016) DOI: 10.1017/S0954394515000198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Popescu, Knowledge Modeling and Terminology Studies in the Field of Engineering, The 14th International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Cambridge (MA), January 30-31, 257 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. J.R. Bellegarda, Exploiting latent semantic information in statistical language modeling, Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8) (2000) [Google Scholar]
  18. Wu Cx, J. Baccanello, Using Contrastive Terminology Analysis in Teaching a Foreign Language, Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (3), 461–471 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Hoffmann, Construction grammar as cognitive structuralism: the interaction of constructional networks and processing in the diachronic evolution of English comparative correlatives, English Language and Linguistics, 21(2), 349–373 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. H. Zho, Making a stance: social action for language and intercultural communication research, Language and Intercultural Communication 20 (2), 206–212 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Khasanova, I. Kuznetsova, M. Gulkanyan, The equivalence of the Russian and english phraseological terms in the field of construction and architecture, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 890 (2020) DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/890/1/012213 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. V. Vivaldi, J. Zulategui, The Wished Formulas: A contrastive Analysis between Standard Spanish and German, Linguistica Pragensia 29(1), 47–66 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Rosenbachn, On the (non-)equivalence of constructions with determiner genitives and noun modifiers in English, English Language & Linguistics 23(4), 759–796 (2019) doi: 10.1017/S1360674319000273 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Gamallo, S. Sotelo, J.R. Pichel, M. Artetxe, Contextualized Translations of Phrasal Verbs with Distributional Compositional Semantics and Monolingual Corpora, Computational Linguistics 45(3), 395–421 (2019) DOI: 10.1162/COLI_a_00353 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Krzyzanowska, Comparative analysis of linguistic terminology: case of french and polish phraseology, Roczniki humanistyczne 65 (8), 117–129 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. Sasu, Comparative-contrastive analysis of Romanian-English translation of verb phrase structures, 4th International Conference on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics - Structure, Use and Meaning: (Re/De) Contextualisation, 311–322 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. J.A. Yuan, Comparative Study of English and Chinese Ditransitive Constructions. North East Asia International Symposium on Linguistics, Literature and Teaching, 237–243 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  28. E.M. Ponti, O. Helen, Y. Berzak, I. Vulic, R. Reichart, Th. Poibeau, E. Shutova, A. Korhonen 2019 Modeling Language Variation and Universals: A Survey on Typological Linguistics for Natural Language Processing Computational Linguistics 45(3), 559–601 DOI: 10.1162/COLI_a_00357 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. W. Gladrow, E. Kotorova, Contrastive Examination of Speech Handling Patterns, Zeitschrift fur Slawistik 62(3), 365–386 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Ilyushchenko, Comparative Study of English and Russian Phraseology: Component Theory of Identity and Difference of the Seme Organization, Journal of Language & Education 3(1), 75–84 (2017) DOI: 10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-1-75-84 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. S.V. Grinev, Vvedenie v terminografiyu [Introduction to Terminology Studies] (MPU, 1995) [Google Scholar]
  32. Oxford Illustrated Dictionar, (Dorling Kindersley Limited and Oxford University Press, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  33. M.V. Adamchick, Complete English-Russian Polytechnical Dictionary, (AST, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  34. S. Meral, E. Kishali, A Study on the Intersection of Architectural History and Architectural Conservation: Uskudar Semsi AhmedPasa Complex Artsanat 13, 313–334 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. I.B. Lykov, T.V. Popova, Macrostructure of special online russian dictionaries of architecture and construction: general characteristics. 3d International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts, SGEM 4(2), 375–381 (2016) DOI: 10.21122/2309-4923-2018-4-74-82 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.