EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 04002 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Cities and Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128004002
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. K. Borghys, S. van der Graaf, N. Walravens, M. van Compernolle, Multi-Stakeholder innovation in smart city discourse: quadruple helix thinking in the age of “platforms”. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities 2(5) (2020). doi:10.3389/frsc.2020.00005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Mueller, D. Rojas-Rueda, H. Khreis, et al., Changing the urban design of cities for health: the superblock model. Environmental International 134, 105132 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105132 [Google Scholar]
  3. E. P. Trindade, M.P.F. Hinnig, E.M. da Costa, et al., Sustainable development of smart cities: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation 3, 11 (2017). doi:10.1186/s40852-017-0063-2 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. O. V. Prokopenko, V. M. Kysly, H. M. Shevchenko, Peculiarities of the natural resources economic estimation under the transformational conditions. Economic Annals-XXI 7-8(1), 40–43 (2014), http://soskin.info/en/ea/2014/7-8/contents_10.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  5. European Commission website, A European Green Deal. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en (2020). Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Sustainable Development Goals Ukraine (Voluntary National Review, 2020), https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/26295VNR_2020_Ukraine_Report.pdf. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Petrushenko, H. Shevchenko, B. Burkynskyi, N. Khumarova, A game-theoretical model for investment in inclusive recreation and wellness in Ukraine: the regional context. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 16(4), 382–394 (2019). doi:10.21511/imfi.16(4).2019.32 [Google Scholar]
  8. H. M. Shevchenko, Regulatory policy and optimization of investment resource allocation in model of functioning recreation industry. Baltic Journal of Economic Science 3(1), 109–115 (2017). doi:10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-1-109-115 [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. Sintomer, C. Herzberg, A. Röcke, G. Allegretti, Transnational models of citizen participation: the case of participatory budgeting. Journal of Public Deliberation 8(2) (2012). doi:10.16997/jdd.141 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Herzberg, 10 Jahre Bürgerhaushalte in Deutschland: eine Bilanz. JB StadtRegion 1, 105–117. https://www.budrichjournals.de/index.php/stadtregion/article/view/4700 (2010). Accessed 02 Mar 2021 [Google Scholar]
  11. S. H. Schneider, Bürgerhaushalte in Deutschland. Individuelle und kontextuelle Einflussfaktoren der Beteiligung (Springer VS, Wiesbaden, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Gibbons, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, M. A. Trow, The new production of knowledge (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, 1994) [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff, The triple helix – university-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review 14, 14–19 (1995) [Google Scholar]
  14. E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, in Knowledge creation, diffusion, and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters: a comparative systems approach across the United States, Europe, and Asia (Praeger Publishers, 2006), pp. 1–25 [Google Scholar]
  15. E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, “Mode 3” and “quadruple helix”: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management 46(3/4), 201–234 (2009). doi:10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374 [Google Scholar]
  16. E. G. Carayannis, T. D. Barth, D. F. Campbell, The quintuple helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of innovation and entrepreneurship 1(2) (2012). doi:10.1186/2192-5372-1-2 [Google Scholar]
  17. E. G. Carayannis, D. F. J. Campbell, in Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship, ed. by E. G. Carayannis, I. N. Dubina, et al. (2013), pp. 1293–1300. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_310 [Google Scholar]
  18. Public budget. Kyiv, https://gb.kyivcity.gov.ua/. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  19. State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Income and living conditions (2020), http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Baturin, M. Bondar, G. Kovalchuk, et al., Rating of the ecological security of regions. Where is the cleanest air in Ukraine? (Focus, 31 Jan 2020), https://focus.ua/ukraine. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. N. Kimatu, Evolution of strategic interactions from the triple to quad helix innovation models for sustainable development in the era of globalization. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 5(16) (2016). doi:10.1186/s13731-016-0044-x [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. S. H. Schneider, S. Busse, Participatory budgeting in Germany – a review of empirical findings. International Journal of Public Administration 42(3), 259–273 (2019). doi:10.1080/01900692.2018.1426601 [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Röcke, in Framing citizen participation (Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2014). doi:10.1057/9781137326669_9 [Google Scholar]
  24. H. M. Shevchenko, V. M. Pakhomov, M. M. Petrushenko, Economic and legal issues of rural and recreational land use in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI 1-2(156), 54–58 (2016). doi:10.21003/ea.V156-0012 [Google Scholar]
  25. H. Shevchenko, M. Petrushenko, B. Burkynskyi, N. Khumarova, Y. Opanasiuk, Management of wellness and recreation in urban agglomerations. Problems and Perspectives in Management 18(1), 231–241 (2020). doi:10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.20 [Google Scholar]
  26. ISO. COVID-19 response: freely available ISO standard (Apr 2020), https://www.iso.org/covid Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Weber, Economic education in Germany. Journal of Social Science Education 1 (2002). doi:10.4119/UNIBI/jsse-v1-i2-458 [Google Scholar]
  28. K. Hüfner, Governance and funding of higher education in Germany. Higher Education in Europe 28(2), 145–163, (2003). doi:10.1080/03797720304104 [Google Scholar]
  29. R. D. Anderson, Germany and the humboldtian model (Oxford Scholarship Online, 2004). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198206606.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Dohmen, in National systems of innovation in comparison, ed. by U. Schmoch, C. Rammer, H. Legler (Dordrecht, Springer, 2006). doi:10.1007/1-4020-4949-1_14 [Google Scholar]
  31. OECD. Education policy outlook Germany (2014), http://www.oecd.org/education/highlightsgermany.htm. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  32. Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The budget of the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, https://www.bmbf.de/en/education-andresearch-priority-areas-of-federal-governmentpolicy-1410.html. Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  33. Ü. Burhan, K. Duruhan, Scrutinizing german education system in terms of its effect on social and cultural structure, employment and economy. OPUS 22(15), 801–822 (2020). doi:10.26466/opus.596969 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.