EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 04012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 04012
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Cities and Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128004012
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. B. Verheggen, B. Strengers, J. Cook, R. van Dorland, K. Vringer, J. Peters, H. Visser, L. Meyer. Scientists’ Views about Attribution of Global Warming, Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8963–8971 (2014). doi:10.1021/es501998e [Google Scholar]
  2. Li. Shushu, M. Yong, Urbanization, Economic Development and Environmental Change. Sustainability 6, 5143–5161 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. V.V. Oznamets, G.V. Belokonev. Formation of greenbelts as an environmental protection tool. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 919 (2020). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/919/6/062050 [Google Scholar]
  4. About Basic principles (strategy) of public ecological policy of Ukraine on a period 2030 to. Law of Ukraine, 2697-VIII. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2697-19?lang=en#Text (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Palliwoda, E. Banzhaf, J. Priess. How do the green components of urban green infrastructure influence the use of ecosystem services? Examples from Leipzig, Germany. Landscape Ecology 35, 1127–1142 (2020). doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01004-w [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Dejeant-Pons. The European Landscape Convention, Florence, 20 October 2000. https://minzp.sk/files/postupy-a-ziadosti/ochranaprirody/medzinarodne-dohovory/o-krajine/6-prezentradaeurpy.pdf (2000) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Pleshkanovska, O. Usova, Some issues of green building in the modern city. Modern problems of architecture and urban planning 6, 331–336 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Krzyżaniak, D. Świerk, M. Szczepańska, P. Urbański, Changes in the area of urban green space in cities of western Poland. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 39, 65–77 (2018). doi:10.2478/bog-2018-0005 [Google Scholar]
  9. DBN B.2.2-12: 2019. Planning and development of territories. State Building Standards of Ukraine. 171 p. (Uarkarhbudinform, Kyiv, 2019) https://dreamdim.ua/wpcontent/uploads/2019/07/DBN-B22-12-2019.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  10. Urban planning: Planner‘s guide, ed. by T.F. Panchenko (Ukrarhbudinformm, Kyiv, 2001), 192 p. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Pleshkanovska. Assessing the level of greening in a major city: subjective and objective evaluation on the example of the city of Kyiv. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series 48, 155–164 (2020). doi:10.1515/29228 [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Ćwik, I. Kasprzyk, T. Wójcik, K. Borycka, Attractiveness of urban parks for visitors versus their potential allergenic hazard: A case study in Rzeszów, Poland. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 35, 221–229 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.09.011 [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Wen, C. Albert, C. Von Haaren. Equality in access to urban green spaces: A case study in Hannover, Germany, with a focus on the elderly population. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 55, 126820 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126820 [Google Scholar]
  14. The Master Plan of Kyiv for the period up to 2020 (current) (Department of Urban Planning and Architecture, Kyiv, 2002), https://kga.gov.ua/generalnij-plan/genplan2020. Accessed 21 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  15. The Master Plan of Kyiv. Substantive provisions. Kyiv (Department of Urban Planning and Architecture, Kyiv, 2020), https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HmqVLp25d4PFL08EuLAQ9O8KEFYbhOo5. Accessed 21 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  16. Statistical information. Population (Main department of statistics in Kyiv, 2020), http://www.kiev.ukrstat.gov.ua/p.php3?c=1123&lang=1. Accessed 14 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  17. Program of complex development of the green zone of Kyiv until 2010 and the concept of formation of green plantations in the central part of the city. Decision of the Kyiv City Council of July 19, 2005 N 806/3381 (2005). Available at: https://ips.ligazakon.net/document/MR050610 [Google Scholar]
  18. Detailed plans of the territory. Kyiv (Department of Urban Planning and Architecture, Kyiv, 2020), https://kga.gov.ua/detalni-plani-teritoriji. Accessed 14 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kyiv City Council. Official Website. https://kmr.gov.ua/uk/content/rishennya-kyyivskoyimiskoyi-rady-1779. Accessed 14 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  20. S.P. Tupis, Methods of conservation and use of objects of the nature reserve fund in the structure of cities, Dissertation, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 2019. https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/2020/dissertation/1573/dysertaciyatupissp2019vak3.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. G. Petryshyn, Progressive Environmental theories in the Formation of Today’s Madrid. Experience and Prospects of Development of Ukraine cities: Ecological aspects of urban planning 19, 180–190 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  22. Architecture Prize, Madrid Rio (2017). https://architectureprize.com/winners/winner.php?id=3060. Accessed 14 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  23. Senate Department for Environment, Transport and Climate Protection. Berlin.de (2018). https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/natur-undgruenlandschaftsplanung/20-gruene-hauptwege/. Accessed 12 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  24. Landscape program. Species protection program Berlin.de (2017). https://www.berlin.de/sen/uvk/natur-undgruen/landschaftsplanung/. Accessed 12 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  25. A map of the actual vegetation of the City of Krakow and the designation of the most valuable natural areas, necessary to maintain the balance of the city’s ecosystem. Public Information Bulletin (2017). https://www.bip.krakow.pl/?dok_id=20495&lid=600241416&vReg=2&vReg=3. Accessed 12 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.