EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 06004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 06004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Sustainable Environment and Environmental Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128006004
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. B. Z. Houlton, M. Almaraz, V. Aneja, A.T. Austin, et al., A world of cobenefits: Solving the global nitrogen challenge. Earth’s Future 7, 865– 872 (2019). doi:10.1029/2019EF001222 [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Lorenz, R. Lal, Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Ecosystems (Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 357–386 [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Sikora, M. Niemiec, A. Szeląg-Sikora, Z. Gódek-Szostak, M. Kuboń, M. Komorowska, The Impact of a Controlled-Release Fertilizer on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Efficiency of the Production of Chinese Cabbage. Energies. 13 (8), (2020). doi:10.3390/en13082063 [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Paull, J. Bio-Dynam. Tasmania, 94, 16–21 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Rutting, H. Aronsson, S. Delin, Efficient use of nitrogen in agriculture. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 110, 1–5 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10705-017-9900-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. N. M., A. Abid Ali Gill, S. Singh (ed.), Contaminants in Agriculture (Springer, Champ, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. Ya. Ronga, Su. Yong-zhong, Wa. Tao, Ya. Qin, Effect of chemical and organic fertilization on soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation in a newly cultivated farmland. J. Integ. Agric. 3, 658–666 (2016). doi:10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61107-8 [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Yilmaz, M. Sönmez, The role of organic/bio–fertilizer amendment on aggregate stability and organic carbon content in different aggregate scales. Soil and Tillage Research, 168, 118–124 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. M. J. Goss, A. Tubeileh, D. Goorahoo, A Review of the Use of Organic Amendments and the Risk to Human Health. Advances in agronomy, 120, 275–379 (2013). doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407686-0.00005-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. G.A. Malomo, A.S. Madugu, S. A. Bolu, in Agricultural waste and residues, ed. by A. Aladjadjiyan (IntechOpen, London, 2018), pp. 119–137 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gh. Galanakis (ed.), Sustainable meat production and processing (Academic Press, London, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. H.A. Makhlof, H.A. Mohammeda, G.L. Ahmed, Effect of organic (biochar, compost and chicken manure) and mineral fertilization on available NPK on sandy soil. J. Pure Appl. Sci. 18: 86–91 (2019). doi: 10.36602/jmuas.2019.v01.01.11 [Google Scholar]
  13. Ie.V. Skrylnyk, A.M. Kutova, V.A. Hetmanenko, К.S. Artemieva, V.M. Nikonenko, Vplyv system udobrennia na orhanichnu rechovynu ta ahrokhimichni pokaznyky chornozemu typovoho (Influence of fertilizers application systems on soil organic matter and agrochemical characteristics of the chernozem typical). Agrochem. Soil Science, 88. 74–78 (2019). doi:10.31073/acss88-10 [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Jakub, et al., in 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, Sofia, 30 June - 6 July, 2019. vol. 19 (SGEM, Sofia, 2019), pp. 583–595. [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Mujdeci, A. Isildar, V. Uygur, P. Alaboz, Cooperative effects of field traffic and organic matter treatments on some compaction-related soil properties. Solid Earth 8, 189–198 (2017).doi:10.5194/se-8-189-2017 [Google Scholar]
  16. M. V. Alves, J. C. P. Santos, J. C. Segat, D. G. Sousa, D. Baretta, Revista Agrarian. 11 (41), 219–229 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Kucher, M. Heldak, A. Orlenko, Project management in organic agricultural production. Agric. And Res. Econom. 3, 104- 128 (2018). doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.28 1753 [Google Scholar]
  18. Ye. Ulko, Agrosvit. 17, 26–35 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. Ye. Ulko, Evaluation of economic efficiency of innovations in organic agriculture. Agric. and Res. Econom. 3, 118- 140 (2019). doi:10.22004/ag.econ.293 989 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Kucher, Estimation of effectiveness of usage of liquid organic fertilizer in the context of rational land use: a case study of Ukraine. Prz. Wschod. 2, 95–105 (2017). doi:/10.31648/pw.3573 [Google Scholar]
  21. V.T. Engin, E.İ. Cöcen, J. Under. Res. 2, 13–20 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. Yu. Solmaz, K. Belliturk, A. Adiloglu, S. Adiloglu, Eurasian J. of Forest Sci. 1, 44–51 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. Sh. A. Sodikova, D. N. Makhkamova, Z. T. Usmonova, Universum. 6 (63) (2019) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Dawson, J. Hilton, Fertilizer availability in a resourcelimited world : production and recycling of nitrogen and phosphorus. Food Policy. 36, S14–S22 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.012 [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Dhillon, G. Torres, E. Driver, B. Figueiredo, `. Raun, Agronomy J. 4, 1670–1677 (2017). doi: 10.2134/agronj2016.08.0483 [Google Scholar]
  26. A. K. Srivastava, A. K. Chandran, M. Sharma, K. H. Jung, P. Suprasanna, G. K. Pandey, Emerging concepts of potassium homeostasis in plants. J. of Exp. Bot. 2, 608–619 (2019). doi:10.1093/jxb/erz458 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.