EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 06010 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 06010
Number of page(s) 9
Section Sustainable Environment and Environmental Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128006010
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. Siokhin, V.D., Gorlov, P.I., Annenkov A.B. “Methods for using software for monitoring seasonal bird systems and assessing the impact of wind farms.” Branta: Collection of scientific works of the Azov- Black Sea Ornithological Station (2014) [Google Scholar]
  2. Gorlov, P.I., Siokhin, V.D. Analysis of international experience in studying the impact of wind power plants on birds. Biological Bulletin of Bodgan Khmelnytsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 1, 37–47.(2012) [Google Scholar]
  3. Gorlov, P.I., Siokhin, V.D., Dolinny V.I., Sidorenko A.I. Seasonal ornithological features of the territory of Botievsky wind power plant (Zaporozhye region) according to the results of observations in the spring periods of 2013-2014. Branta: Proceedings of scientific works of the Azov-Black Sea ornithological station, 17, 19–38. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  4. Osadchyi, V., Yeremieiev, V. & Osadcha, K. Software for analyzing the probability of collisions of birds with rotors of wind electrical installations. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 6(4), 1–18. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. Primosk WPP. URL: http:https://delo.ua/business/vukraine-zarabotala-odna-iz-krupnejshih-vetrjan-359989/ (2020) Accessed 23 Oct 2020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Siokhin V.D., Gorlov P.I., Polishchuk I.K., Podorozhny S.M., Dolinna O.M. Conducting modern monitoring research and development of expert conclusion and scientific report on the impact of wind power plants construction on natural environmental complexes, ornithological complexes and migratory birds, bats within the Primorsky district of Zaporozhye region. Melitopol: Research and Production Enterprise “Ekoresurs i monitorynh”. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. Siokhin V.D., Chenichko J.I., Sidorenko A.I., Gorlov P.I., Aleinikova K.G. Cumulative assessment of the impact of wind power plants on natural complexes in the man-made areas of the north-western Azov Sea. Message 2. Seasonal complexes of birds. Monitoring and protection of biodiversity in Ukraine: Applied aspects of monitoring and protection of biodiversity. Series: Conservation Biology in Ukraine. Chernivtsi: Print Art, 16(3), 152–167. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  8. Arnett, Edward B., and Erin F. Baerwald. “Impacts of wind energy development on bats: implications for conservation.” Bat evolution, ecology, and conservation. Springer, New York, NY, 435–456. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. Aschwanden, J., Stark, H., Peter, D., Steuri, T., Schmid, B. & Liechti, F., Bird collisions at wind turbines in a mountainous area related to bird movement intensities measured by radar. Biological Conservation, 220, 228–236. (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. Band, W., Madders M., Whitfield D.P. Windfarms and Birds: Calculating a theoretical collision Rz assuming no avoiding action. Guidance note series: Scottish Natural Heritage. URL: https://tethys.pnnl.gov/sites/default/files/publications/Band-2000.pdf (2012) Accessed 25 Oct 2020 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  11. Band, W., Madders M., Whitfield D.P. Developing field and analytical methods to assess avian collision risk at wind farms. Birds and Wind Farms: Risk Assessment and Mitigation. Ed. by M. de Lucas, G.F. E. Janss & M. Ferrier. Madrid: Quercus, 259–275. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  12. Band, W., Using a collision risk model to assess bird collision risks for offshore windfarms. March, 62. URL: http://surl.li/obyt (2012) Accessed 25 Oct 2020 [Google Scholar]
  13. Dai, K., Bergot, A., Liang, C., Xiang, W. N. & Huang, Z., Environmental issues associated with wind energy–A review. Renewable Energy, 75, 911–921. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. Furness, R. W. A review of red-throated diver and great skua avoidance rates at onshore wind farms in Scotland. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report, 885. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. Jervis, L., Offshore Ornithology - Collision Rz Modelling /L. Jervis, S. McGovern, S. Sweeney, R. Buisson // Report Volume 4, Annex 4-2. 2017. https://corporate.vattenfall.co.uk/globalassets/uk/projects/thanet-ext/peirnov-2017/volume-4/vol4ann4-2-ornithologycrm.pdf (2017) Accessed 22 Oct 2020 [Google Scholar]
  16. Krijgsveld, K. L., Akershoek, K., Schenk, F., Dijk, F. & Dirksen, S. Collision risk of birds with modern large wind turbines. Ardea, 97(3), 357–366.(2009) [Google Scholar]
  17. Lekuona, J. M., & Ursua, C., Avian mortality in wind power plants of Navarra (Northern Spain): 177-192. Birds and wind farms. Risk assesment and mitigation. Servicios Informativos Ambientales/Quercus, Madrid. (2007) [Google Scholar]
  18. Loss, S. R., Will, T. & Marra, P. P., Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States. Biological Conservation, 168, 201–209. (2013) [Google Scholar]
  19. May, R., Hoel, P. L., Langston, R., Dahl, E. L., Bevanger, K., Reitan, O., et. al. Collision Rz in whitetailed eagles. Modelling collision Rz using vantage point observations in Smøla wind-power plant. NINA Report 639, 25. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  20. Morinha, F., Travassos, P., Seixas, F., Martins, A., Bastos, R., Carvalho, D. & Cabral, J.A. Differential mortality of birds killed at wind farms in Northern Portugal. Bird Study, 61(2), 255–259. (2014) [Google Scholar]
  21. Osadchyi, V., Siokhin, V., Gorlov, P. Yeremieiev, V. & Osadcha, K., Development of the information system for forecasting collision between birds and wind farms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(2 (100)), 29–40. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  22. Scottish Natural Heritage. Recommended bird survey methods to inform impact assessment of onshore wind farms May. URL: http://surl.li/obym (2014) Accessed 28 Oct 2020 [Google Scholar]
  23. Sebastián-González E., Pérez-García J.M., Carrete M., Donázar J.A., Sánchez-Zapata J.A. Using network analysis to identify indicator species and reduce collision fatalities at wind farms. Biological Conservation, 224, 209–212. http://dx.doi.org/110.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.003 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  24. Smith, J.A., Dwyer J.F. Avian interactions with renewable energy infrastructure: an update. Condor, 118, 411–423. (2016) [Google Scholar]
  25. Yeremieiev, V., Osadchyi, V., Gorlov, P. & Siokhin, V., Methodology for calculating the number of migratory birds in the territory of the wind farms of the Azov region using information and communication technology. In E3S Web of Conferences, 166, 1–8. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, S., Wang, S. & Smith, P., Ecological impacts of wind farms on birds: Questions, hypotheses, and research needs. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 599–607. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  27. Winkelman, J.E. De invloed van de Sepproefwindcentrale te Oosterbierum (Fr.) op vogels. DLOInstituut voor Bos-en Natuuronderzoek. (1992) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.