EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 09011 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 09011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Innovative Approaches for Solving Environmental Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128009011
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. O. Maevsky, V. Artemchuk, Y. Brodsky, I. Pilkevych, P. Topolnitsky, Modeling of the Process of Optimization of Decision-Making at Control of Parameters of Energy and Technical Systems on the Example of Remote Earth’s Sensing Tools, in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 298, ed. by V. Babak, V. Isaienko, A. Zaporozhets (Springer, Cham, 2020), pp. 111-122. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48583-2_7 [Google Scholar]
  2. O. Maevsky, V. Artemchuk, Y. Brodsky, L. Makarenko, Y. Shpylovyi, The Conceptual Approach to the Development of Software Tools for Analysis and Synthesis of Geophysical Monitoring Systems Models, in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Springer, Cham, 2021 to be published) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Iatsyshyn, A. Iatsyshyn, V. Artemchuk, I. Kameneva, V. Kovach, O. Popov, Software tools for tasks of sustainable development of environmental problems: peculiarities of programming and implementation in the specialists’ preparation. E3S Web Conf. 166, 01001 (2020). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202016601001 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Іatsyshyn, A. Іatsyshyn, V. Kovach, I. Zinovieva, V. Artemchuk, O. Popov, O. Cholyshkina, O. Radchenko, O. Radchenko, A. Turevych, Application of Open and Specialized Geoinformation Systems for Computer Modelling Studying by Students and PhD Students. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2732, 893–908 (2020), http://ceurws.org/Vol-2732/20200893.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2020 [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Semerikov, S. Chukharev, S. Sakhno, A. Striuk, V. Osadchyi, V. Solovieva, T. Vakaliuk, P. Nechypurenko, O. Bondarenko, H. Danylchuk, Our sustainable coronavirus future. E3S Web Conf. 166, 00001 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Mergner et al., Fostering sustainable feedstock production for advanced biofuels on underutilised land in Europe. In European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings 2017, 125–130 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Kovach, G. Lysychenko, Toxic Soil Contamination and Its Mitigation in Ukraine, in Soil Science Working for a Living, ed. by D. Dent, Y. Dmytruk (Springer, Cham, 2017). doi:10.1007/978- 3-319-45417-7_18 [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Popov, A. Yatsyshyn, Mathematical Tools to Assess Soil Contamination by Deposition of Technogenic Emissions, in Soil Science Working for a Living, ed. by D. Dent, Y. Dmytruk (Springer, Cham, 2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45417-7_11 [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Yatsyshyn, L. Shkitsa, O. Popov, M. Liakh, Development of mathematical models of gas leakage and its propagation in atmospheric air at an emergency gas well gushing. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 5/10(101), 49–59 (2019). doi:10.15587/1729-4061.2019.179097 [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Shkitsa, T. Yatsyshyn, M. Lyakh, O. Sydorenko, Innovative approaches to the formation of environmental safety at the objects of oil and gas production. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 749, 012009 (2020). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/749/1/012009 [Google Scholar]
  11. I. Melnychuk, O. Savko, S. Pobihun, N. Havadzyn, The impact of a country’s level of economic development on environmental safety. Procedia Environmental Science, Engineering and Management (2020 to be published) [Google Scholar]
  12. M.L. Myrontsov, Multi-Probe Hardware for Electrometry of Oil and Gas Wells, Science and innovation 14(3), 51–56 (2018). doi:15407/scine14.03.051 [Google Scholar]
  13. A.O. Zaporozhets, V.V. Khaidurov, Mathematical Models of Inverse Problems for Finding the Main Characteristics of Air Pollution Sources. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 231, 563 (2020). doi:10.1007/s11270-020-04933-z [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Zaporozhets, V. Babak, V. Isaienko, K. Babikova, Analysis of the Air Pollution Monitoring System in Ukraine, in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 298, ed. by V. Babak, V. Isaienko, A. Zaporozhets (Springer, Cham, 2020), pp. 85–110. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48583-2_6 [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Pobihun, Y. Korobeinykova, O. Pobihun, I. Iuras, Ecological and monitoring studies of oil production territories and possibility of their use in recreation, in Proceedings of the XIII International Scientific Conference “Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment”, vol. 2019, pp. 1–5. (2019). doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201903183 [Google Scholar]
  16. Y. Balashevska, Y. Kyrylenko, O. Pecherytsia, I. Shevchenko, V. Bogorad, Harmonization of Methodological Approaches and Real Time Radiological Consequence Forecasting Tools. Nucl. Radiat. Saf. 2(86), 20–26 (2020). doi:10.32918/nrs.2020.2(86).03 [Google Scholar]
  17. К.A. Кarimov, R.D. Gainutdinova, Role of different physical factors in long-term changes of surface temperature. Proceedings of Hydrometcentre of Russia 366, 121–136 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. J.K. Alvarez, S. Sutjipto, S. Kodagoda, Validated ground penetrating radar simulation model for estimating rebar location in infrastructure monitoring. Proceedings of the 2017 12th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (2018). doi:10.1109/ICIEA.2017.8283069 [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Azpiroz-Zabala, M.J.B. Cartigny, E.J. Sumner, M.A. Clare et al., A general model for the helical structure of geophysical flows in channel bends. Geophysical Research Letters 44(23), 11932–11941. (2017). doi:10.1002/2017GL075721 [Google Scholar]
  20. F. Dammeier, J.R. Moore, C. Hammer, F. Haslinger, S Loew, Automatic detection of alpine rockslides in continuous seismic data using hidden Markov models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 121(2), 351–371 (2016). doi:10.1002/2015JF003647 [Google Scholar]
  21. V. Di Fiore, M. Punzo, D. Tarallo, D., G. Cavuoto, Application of innovative geophysical techniques in coastal areas. Geophysics: Principles, applications and emerging technologies, pp. 47–59 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  22. P.N. Edwards, Knowledge infrastructures for the anthropocene. Anthropocene Review 4(1), 34–43. (2017). doi:10.1177/2053019616679854 [Google Scholar]
  23. F. Greco et al., A multidisciplinary strategy for in-situ and remote sensing monitoring of areas affected by pressurized fluids: Application to mud volcanoes: A multidisciplinary environmental monitoring strategy. SAS 2016 - Sensors Applications Symposium, Proceedings 291–296. (2016). doi:10.1109/SAS.2016.7479861 [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Li, R. Hu, Numerical simulation of ground penetrating radar based on advanced prediction of adverse geological bodies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 371(2) (2019). doi:10.1088/1755-1315/371/2/022038 [Google Scholar]
  25. S. Marullo, P.J. Minnett, R. Santoleri, M. Tonani, The diurnal cycle of sea-surface temperature and estimation of the heat budget of the Mediterranean sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121(11), 8351–8367 (2016). doi:10.1002/2016JC012192 [Google Scholar]
  26. V.V. Penenko, A. V., Penenko, E.A. Tsvetova, Variational approach to the study of processes of geophysical hydro-thermodynamics with assimilation of observation data. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics 58(5), 771–778 (2017). doi:10.1134/S0021894417050029 [Google Scholar]
  27. P. Schattan et al., Continuous monitoring of snowpack dynamics in alpine terrain by aboveground neutron sensing. Water Resources Research 53(5), 3615–3634 (2017). doi:10.1002/2016WR020234 [Google Scholar]
  28. J.S. Schlosser et al., Analysis of aerosol composition data for western united states wildfires between 2005 and 2015: Dust emissions, chloride depletion, and most enhanced aerosol constituents. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 122(16), 8951–8966 (2017). doi:10.1002/2017JD026547 [Google Scholar]
  29. J.R. Schroeder et al., Formaldehyde column density measurements as a suitable pathway to estimate nearsurface ozone tendencies from space. Journal of Geophysical Research 121(21), 13,088-13, 112 (2016). doi:10.1002/2016JD025419 [Google Scholar]
  30. F.J. Wrona et al., Transitions in Arctic ecosystems: Ecological implications of a changing hydrological regime. Journal of Geophysical Research G: Biogeosciences 121(3), 650–674 (2016). doi:10.1002/2015JG003133 [Google Scholar]
  31. X. Bao, H. Li, Study on the evaluation method of subgrade slope green protection effect in dry-hot valley of sichuan-tibet railway. Mathematical Problems in Engineering (2020). doi:10.1155/2020/7159582 [Google Scholar]
  32. C.T. Bauch, R. Sigdel, J. Pharaon, M. Anand, Early warning signals of regime shifts in coupled humanenvironment systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113(51), 14560–14567 (2016). doi:10.1073/pnas.1604978113 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Benaіm, S.J. Schreiber, Persistence and extinction for stochastic ecological models with internal and external variables. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 79(1), 393–431 (2019). doi:10.1007/s00285-019-01361-4 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Chen, An evolutionary game study of an ecological industry chain based on multi-agent simulation: A case study of the poyang lake eco-economic zone. Sustainability 9(7). (2017). doi:10.3390/su9071165 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. L. Dan, Research on innovation-synergy driven model for improving ecological competitiveness in resource-based city. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology 15(2), 515–520 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  36. P. He-Si, L. Hong-Zhi, The evolutionary game analysis of cross-regional ecological compensation - based on the perspective of the main functional area. E3S Web of Conferences 53 (2018). doi:10.1051/e3sconf/20185304043 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. R. Sigdel, M. Anand, C.T. Bauch, Convergence of socio-ecological dynamics in disparate ecological systems under strong coupling to human social systems. Theoretical Ecology 12(3), 285–296 (2019). doi:10.1007/s12080-018-0394-z [Google Scholar]
  38. P. J. Vermeulen et al., An evolutionary game theoretical model shows the limitations of the additive partitioning method for interpreting biodiversity experiments. Journal of Ecology 105(2), 345–353 (2017). doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12706 [Google Scholar]
  39. MathCAD. Math software for engineering calculations, https://www.mathcad.com/en/. Accessed 29 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  40. Welcome to Python, https://www.python.org/. Accessed 29 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.