EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 280 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 280 (2021) 09012 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2021
Second International Conference on Sustainable Futures: Environmental, Technological, Social and Economic Matters (ICSF 2021)
Article Number 09012
Number of page(s) 7
Section Innovative Approaches for Solving Environmental Issues
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128009012
Published online 30 June 2021
  1. P. Rydzewski, Between economy and security. dilemmas of sustainable development in the COVID-19 era – an example of great britain, Problemy Ekorozwoju, 15(2), 15–21 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  2. Law of Ukraine “On Ratification of the Association Agreement between Ukraine, of the one part, and the European Union, the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the other part” of 16 September 2014 № 1678-VII, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1678-18#Text, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  3. Law of Ukraine “On Ratification of the Protocol on the Accession of Ukraine to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community” of 15.12.2010 № 2787-VI, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2787-17#Text, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  4. National plan to reduce emissions from large combustion plants. Order of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine of November 8, 2017 № 796-r, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/796-2017-%D1%80#Text, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  5. Directive (EU) 2015/2193 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from medium combustion plants, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32015L2193, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  6. Tax Code of Ukraine, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2755-17, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  7. Commission notice. Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy development for 2014-2020, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_009-14#Text, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Maliarenko, V. Horskyi, V. Stanytsina,· O. Bogoslavska,·H. Kuts, An Improved Approach to Evaluation of the Efficiency of Energy Saving Measures Based on the Indicator of Products Total Energy Intensity, in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 298, ed. by V. Babak, V. Isaienko, A. Zaporozhets (Springer, Cham, 2020), 201– 216. (2020). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-48583-2_13 [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Bogoslavska, V. Stanytsina, V. Artemchuk, O. Garmata, V. Lavrinenko, Comparative Efficiency Assessment of Using Biofuels in Heat Supply Systems by Levelized Cost of Heat into Account Environmental Taxes, in Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Springer, Cham, 2021 to be published) [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Nong, M. Siriwardana, S. Perera, D.B. Nguyen, Growth of low emission-intensive energy production and energy impacts in vietnam under the new regulation, Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 90- 103, (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.299 [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Foumani, K. Smith-Miles, The impact of various carbon reduction policies on green flowshop scheduling. Applied Energy, 249, 300– 315б (2019). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.155 [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Leisen, B. Steffen, C. Weber, Regulatory risk and the resilience of new sustainable business models in the energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.330 [Google Scholar]
  13. V. Andreoni, Environmental taxes: Drivers behind the revenue collected. Journal of Cleaner Production, 221, 17–26. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.216 [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Exploring the impacts of carbon tax on tourism-related energy consumption in China. Sustainable Development. (2018). doi:10.1002/sd.1900 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Wang, L. J. Qing, H. Wang, H.Y. Li, Integrated assessment of environmental performance-based contracting for sulfur dioxide emission control in Chinese coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 177, 878–887. (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.280 [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Nong, Development of the electricityenvironmental policy CGE model (GTAP-EPowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa. Energy Policy, 140, 111375. (2020). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111375 [Google Scholar]
  17. P. K. Wesseh, B. Lin, Does improved environmental quality prevent a growing economy? Journal of Cleaner Production, 118996. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118996 [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Kondo, Y. Kinoshita, T. Yamada, Green Procurement Decisions with Carbon Leakage by Global Suppliers and Order Quantities under Different Carbon Tax. Sustainability, 11(13), 3710. (2019). doi:10.3390/su11133710 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Streimikiene, I. Siksnelyte, E. Zavadskas, F. Cavallaro, The Impact of Greening Tax Systems on Sustainable Energy Development in the Baltic States. Energies, 11(5), 1193. (2018). doi:10.3390/en11051193 [Google Scholar]
  20. U. Nissen, N. Harfst, Shortcomings of the traditional “levelized cost of energy” [LCOE] for the determination of grid parity. Energy, 171, 1009–1016. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.093 [Google Scholar]
  21. J.-L. Fan, S. Wei, et al., Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China. Energy. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.003 [Google Scholar]
  22. J. Aldersey-Williams, I.D. Broadbent, P.A. Strachan, Better estimates of LCOE from audited accounts – A new methodology with examples from United Kingdom offshore wind and CCGT. Energy Policy, 128, 25–35. (2019). doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.044 [Google Scholar]
  23. G. Zang, J. Jia, S. Tejasvi, A. Ratner, E. Silva Lora, Techno-economic comparative analysis of Biomass Integrated Gasification Combined Cycles with and without CO2 capture. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 78, 73–84. (2018). doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.023 [Google Scholar]
  24. Alfa-Invest, https://ainvest.com.ua/aktualno/tablitsa-teplotvornosti.html, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  25. 1.A.4 Small combustion, https://www.eea.europa.eu/ru/publications/rukovodstvo-emep-eaos-po-inventarizaciivybrosov-2016/chast-b-glavy-posvyaschennye-tehnicheskimaspektam/1-energetika/1-a-szhiganie/1-a-4-maloeszhiganie/view, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  26. Tables for guidelines, https://www.altstu.ru/media/f/Prilozhenie-2-tablicy.pdf, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  27. O.G. Levitska, Comparative analysis of emissions of harmful substances in the use of alternative natural gas to biofuels, http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vldubzh_2019_20_15, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  28. Calculation of emissions into the atmosphere during natural gas combustion, http://www.te.ukrstat.gov.ua/files/respondent/2tp.pdf, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  29. GKD 34.02.305-2002 “Emissions of pollutants substances into the atmosphere from power plants”, http://lib.sumdu.edu.ua/library/docs/rio/2005/m976.doc, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  30. Carbon Taxes in Europe in 2019, https://taxfoundation.org/carbon-taxes-in-europe-2019/, Accessed 30 Dec 2020 [Google Scholar]
  31. V. Stanytsina, G. Kuts, O. Teslenko, O. Malyarenko, Comparative analysis of the average cost of heat energy produced in boilers of different power, taking into account the environmental component. Energy Technologies & Resource Saving, 2, 55–62. (2020) doi:10.33070/etars.2.2020.07 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.