Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 283, 2021
2021 3rd International Conference on Civil, Architecture and Urban Engineering (ICCAUE 2021)
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 4
Section Research on Civil Engineering and Geotechnical Hydrological Structure
Published online 07 July 2021
  1. Spacone, E., and S. El-Tawil. “Nonlinear Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures: State of the Art.” Journal of Structural Engineering 130. 2(2004): 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sebastian, W. M., and R.E. Mcconnel. “Nonlinear FE Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures.” Journal of Structural Engineering 126.6 (2000): 662–674. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lin, J. P., J.F. Wang, and R.Q. Xu. “Cohesive Zone Model Based Numerical Analysis of SteelConcrete Composite Structure Push-Out Tests.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, (2014-7-3) 2014(2014): 1–12 [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, S. H., S. Park, and C.Y. Jung. “A New Type of Shear Connection System for Steel-concrete Composite Structures: Y-Type Perfobond Rib Shear Connector.” Magazine of the Korea Concrete Institute (2015). [Google Scholar]
  5. Xia, J., Z. Shen, and B. Chen. “Dynamic Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Frames with Partial Interaction.” Advanced Materials Research 594-597 (2012):904–907. [Google Scholar]
  6. Xian, L., et al. “Bolted end plate connections for steel reinforced concrete composite structures.” Structural Engineering & Mechanics 24.3 (2006):291–306. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhou, Z. C., and H.G. Lei. “Seismic Analysis of a High Rise Antique-Style Pagoda with Steel Reinforced Concrete Composite Structure.” Applied Mechanics and Materials 851(2016):733–738. [Google Scholar]
  8. Irino, T., et al. “Construction of Silo with Steel Lined Reinforced Concrete Composite Structure.” Concrete Journal 27.8(1989):38–46. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, S. L., Hao, P. L., & Song, Y.X. (2011). An exploration of establishment of green building evaluation standards weight system based on analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 71-78, 4166–4169. [Google Scholar]
  10. Fan, B., & Zhao, X.Y. (2014). Comparing the core evaluation system for green building at home and broad. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 507, 163–167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mao, D., Zhou, K., Zheng, S. J., Liu, Y. D., & Liu, Y.P. (2011). Research on evaluation system of green building in china. Advanced Materials Research, 224, 159–163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wang, Q., Feng, X. P., Tian, B., & Li, C.T. (2014). Study on the evaluation index system and evaluation method for the building energy-saving and green building demonstration zone. Advanced Materials Research, 962-965(12), 1612–1615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, X., Zhan, C., Wang, X., & Li, G. (2019). Asian green building rating tools: a comparative study on scoring methods of quantitative evaluation systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218(May 1), 880–895. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Qi-Gan, S., James, L., Sung-Shun, W., & Yen-Ching, C. (2018). Improving the green building evaluation system in china based on the danp method. Sustainability, 10(4), 1173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.