Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 284, 2021
Topical Problems of Green Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (TPACEE-2021)
Article Number 11021
Number of page(s) 10
Section Environmental Policy and Law
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128411021
Published online 12 July 2021
  1. V.P. Branskii, Questions of Philosophy, 4, 112–129 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  2. R.I. Zekrist, Synergistic extension of the method of cultural studies: [monograph]. (LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Germany, 2018) [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Haken, H. Knyazeva, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 31, 1, 57–73 (2000) [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Fitzgerald, Method & Theory in the Study of Religion, 15, 21 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  5. R.N. Lunkin, Religion and law [Electronic resource] (2017) http://www.sclj.ru/news/index.php?sphrase_id=171522&print=Y&PAGEN_1=13 [Google Scholar]
  6. R.N. Lunkin, Policy Memo, 16, 199 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. M.M. Mchedlova, E.N. Kofanova, A.G. Shevchenko, Orthodoxy and loyalty: from social tension to the choice between power and church, 12 (2020), DOI: 10.19181/ezheg.2020.12 [Google Scholar]
  8. D.A. Uzlaner, The neoclassical model of secularization in Western sociology of religion in the second half of the XX -early XXI centuries: Dis. Candidate Philos. Sciences: 09.00.13 Moscow (2009) [Google Scholar]
  9. E.D. Pavlova, Latent influence of the mass media on mass consciousness as a socio-philosophical problem: Dis. ... Cand. philosophy. Science. -Moscow, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Stapleton, D. Marques, T. Thakar., IFAC-Papers OnLine, 50, 1, 6373–6378 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1028 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Th. Frissen, Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106549 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106549 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Z. Hamrah, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1740–1749 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.420 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Webber, A. Kruglanski, E. Molinario, K. Jasko, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 107–111 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Z. Hamrah, Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1740–1749 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.420 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. R. Silva, P. Fernández-Navarro, M. M. Gonçalves, C. Rosa, J. Silva, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 47, 204–214 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.05.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A. DCherniak, M. Mikulincer, P. RShaver, Current Opinion in Psychology, 40, 126–130 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.08.020 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Stapleton, D. Marques, T. Thakar., IFAC-PapersOnLine, 50, 1, 6373–6378 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.1028 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.