EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 285 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 285 (2021) 06008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 285, 2021
International Conference on Advances in Agrobusiness and Biotechnology Research (ABR 2021)
Article Number 06008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Soil Science and Forestry
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202128506008
Published online 06 July 2021
  1. Vlasova O.I., Perederieva, V.M., Volters, I.A., Tivikov, A.I., Trubacheva, L.V. (2015). Change in Microbiological Activity under the Effect of Biological Factors of Soil Fertility in the Central Fore-Caucasus Chernozems, Biology and Medicine, 7(5): 146-151 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alexandrova L.N. (1980). Soil organic matter and the processes of its transformation. L .: Science: 280. [Google Scholar]
  3. Petrov V.B., Chebotar V.K. (2012). Management of destruction and humification of crop residues using the microbiological preparation Extrasol. Agricultural Biology, Vol, 3: 103-108. [Google Scholar]
  4. Narendrula-Kotha, R., Nkongolo, K.K. (2017). Changes in enzymatic activities in metal contaminated and reclaimed lands in Northern Ontario (Canada). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety: 241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.02.040 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martínez-Toledo, Á., Montes-Rocha, A., González-Mille, D.J., Mejia-Saavedra, J.J., Ilizaliturri-Hernández, C.A. (2017). Evaluation of enzyme activitiesin long-term polluted soils with mine tailing deposits of San Luis Potosí, México. Journal of Soils and Sediments, Vol. 17(2): 364-375. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1529-8 [Google Scholar]
  6. Sanchez-Hernandez, J.C., Sandoval, M., Pierart, A. (2017). Short-term response of soil enzyme activities in a chlorpyrifos-treated mesocosm: Useofenzyme-basedindexes. Ecological Indicators, 73: 525-535/ doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.022 [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaffar Basha, S., Basavarajappa, R., Shimalli, G., Babalad, H.B. (2017). Soil microbial dynamics and enzyme activities as influenced by organic and inorganic nutrient management in vertisols under aerobic rice cultivation. Journal of Environmental Biology, 38(1): 131-138. [Google Scholar]
  8. Foster, E.J., Hansen, N., Wallenstein, M., Cotrufo, M.F. (2017). Biochar and manure amendments impact soil nutrients and microbial enzymatic cactivities in a semi-arid irrigated maize cropping system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environme, 233:. 404-414, doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.09.029 [Google Scholar]
  9. Rajper, A.M., Udawatta, R.P., Kremer, R.J., Lin, C.-H., Jose, S. (2016). Effects o fprobiotics on soil microbial activity, biomass andenzymatic activity under cover crops in field and green house studies. Agroforestry Systems, 90(5): 811-827, doi: 10.1007/s10457-016-9895-1 [Google Scholar]
  10. Yu, H., Xiang, Y., Zou, D. (2016). Theeffect of Eulaliopsis binate on the physichemical properties, microbial biomass, and enzymatic activities in Cd-Pb polluted soil. Environmental Scienceand Pollution Research, 23(19): 19212-19218, doi: 10.1007/s10457-016-9895-1 [Google Scholar]
  11. Moreira, R.S., Chiba, M.K., Nunes, S.B., DeMaria, I.C. (2017). Air-drying pretreatment effect on soil enzymatic activity. Plant, Soil and Environment, 63(1): 2933. doi: 10.17221/656/2016-PS [Google Scholar]
  12. Graf, D.R.H., Zhao, M., Jones, C.M., Hallin, S. (2016). Soil type overrides plant effect on genetic and enzymatic N2O production potential in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 100: 125-128, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  13. Garbuz, S.A., Yaroslavtseva, N.V., Kholodov, V.A. (2016). Enzymatic activity inside and outside of water-stable aggregates in soils und erdifferent land use. Eurasian Soil Science, 49(3): 367-375, doi: 10.1134/S1064229316030030 [Google Scholar]
  14. Daou, L., Périssol, C., Luglia, M., Calvert, V., Criquet, S. (2016). Effects of dryingrewetting or freezing-thawing cycles on enzymatic activities of different Mediterranean soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 93: 142-149, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.006 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hagmann, D.F., Goodey, N.M., Mathieu, C., Gallagher, F., Krumins, J.A. (2016). Effect of metal contamination on microbial enzymatic activity in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 91: 291-297, doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.09.012 [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, Y.L., Chen, L.J., Chen, X.H., Li, X.J., Fan, X.H. (2015). Response of soil Enzyme activity to long-term restoration of desertified land. Catena, 133: 64-70 [Google Scholar]
  17. Vlasova O.I., Perederieva V.M., Volters I.A., Drepa E.B., Danilets E.A. (2018). Previous crop - as an element of organic farming in the cultivation of winter wheat in the central pre Caucasus. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 9. Vol. 6: 1272-1276. [Google Scholar]
  18. Esaulko A.N., Aysanov T.S., Sigida M.S., Salenko E.A., Voskoboynikov A.V. (2016). Effect of fertilization systems on the dynamics of CA+ in crops of winter wheat/ Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 7, Vol 3: 2570-2573. [Google Scholar]
  19. Tshovrebov V.S., Faizova V.I., Kalugin D.V., Nikiforova A.M., Lysenko V.Y. (2016). Changes in the content of organic matter in black soils of central ciscaucasia caused by their agricultural use Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 13. Vol. 1: 231-236. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kuprichenkov M.T., Antonova T.N. (2010). Enzymes in the soils of the Ciscaucasia: Monogr. Stavropol Research Institute of Agriculture. Stavropol: AGRUS: 195. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.