Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 293, 2021
2021 3rd Global Conference on Ecological Environment and Civil Engineering (GCEECE 2021)
Article Number 03025
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Resource Development and Green Energy Saving
Published online 23 July 2021
  1. Foley, J.A. Defries, R., Asner, G.P. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science, 2005, 309, 570574. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bai, X.M. Shi, P.J. Liu, Y.S. Realizing China's urban dream. Nature, 2014, 509, 158–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kates, R.W. Clark, W.C. Corell, R. et al. Sustainability science. Science, 2001, 292, 641–642. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Costanza, R. D'Arge, R. de Groot, R. et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387, 253–260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu, J.L. Liu, Y.S. Li, Y.R. Classification evaluation and spatial-temporal analysis of “production-living-ecological” spaces in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72, 1290–1304. [Google Scholar]
  6. Nelson, E. Modeling multiple eco-system services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009, 7, 4–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, Y. On the logical structure, check and balance mechanism and development principle of “production-living-ecological space”. Social Sciences in Hubei, 2016, 3, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cheng, T., Zhao, R., Liang, Y., Production-living-ecological space classification and its functional evaluation. Remote Sensing Information, 2018, 33, 114–121. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, C., Tang, N., Spatio-temporal characteristics and evolution of rural production-living-ecological space function coupling coordination in Chongqing Municipality. Geographical Research, 2018, 37, 1100–1114. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu, W.T., Wang, L.G., Shu, M.H. Reflections on delimiting the three basic spaces in the compilation of urban and rural plans. City Planning Review, 2016, 40, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu, D.Q. Ma, X.C. Gong, J. et al. Functional identification and spatiotemporal pattern analysis of production-living-ecological space in watershed scale: A case study of Bailongjiang Watershed in Gansu. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37,1490–1497. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang, H.Q., Xu, E.Q. Zhu, H.Y. An ecological-living-industrial land classification system and its spatial distribution in China. Resources Science, 2015, 37, 1332–1338. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, S.F. Ma, M. Cai, Y.M. et al. Delimitating red line of ecological protection for territorial spatial planning: A case study of Hunan Province. Tropical Geography, 2015, 35, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhu, Y.Y. Yu, B. Zeng, J.X. et al. Spatial optimization from three spaces of production, living and ecology in national restricted zones: A case study of Wufeng County in Hubei Province. Economic Geography, 2015, 35, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  15. Song, M.J. Chen, D.M. Katie, W. An RP-MCE-SOP framework for China’s county-level “Three-Space” and “Three-Line” planning—An integration of rational planning, Multi-Criteria evaluation, and spatial optimization. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 29–97. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, Y.L. Li, X. Sun, S.L. Evaluation and optimization of rural space suitability based on “the Production, Living and Ecological Space Coordination”--Take Beishakou township, the Xiongan New Area as an example. Urban Development Studies, 2019, 26, 116–124. [Google Scholar]
  17. Xi, J.C. Wang, S.K. Zhang, R.Y. Restructuring and optimizing production-living-ecology space in rural settlements: A case study of Gougezhuang Village at Yesanpo tourism attraction in Hebei Province. Journal of Natural Resources, 2016, 31, 425–435. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rudolf, G. Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75, 175–186. [Google Scholar]
  19. Reidsma, P. König, H. Feng, S.Y. et al. Methods and tools for integrated assessment of land use policies on sustainable development in developing countries. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28,604–617. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guangming Daily commentator. Improve rural environment and build beautiful countryside. Guangming Daily, 2018-2–6(2). [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu, Y. Yang, W. Leadership and governance tools for village sustainable development in China. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 5553. [Google Scholar]
  22. Forman, E.H. Gass, S.I. The analytic hierarchy process: An exposition. Operations Research, 2001, 49, 469–486. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bennett, E.M. Peterson, G.D. Gordon, L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12, 1394–1404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cucari, N. Wankowicz, E. De Falco, S.E. Rural tourism and Albergo Diffuso: A case study for sustainable land-use planning. Land Use Policy, 2019, 82,105–119. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cattaneo, T. Giorgi, E. Ni, M. Landscape, architecture and environmental regeneration: A research by design approach for inclusive tourism in a rural village in China. Sustainability, 2019, 11, 128. [Google Scholar]
  26. Fan, J. The scientific foundation of Major Function Oriented Zoning in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2007, 62, 339–350. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.