Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 305, 2021
RUBIS International Workshop on the Resilience of Rubber-based Agroforestry Systems in the Context of Global Change
Article Number 02001
Number of page(s) 22
Section Socio-Economy of Rubber-Based Agroforestry Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202130502001
Published online 23 September 2021
  1. Baudens, S. Etude bibliographique sur les aspects économiques de la biodiversité des SCAF à hévéa. Document interne CIRAD. Mémoire de seconde année de ISE, St Quentin en Yvelines, France: 35 pages (2000). [Google Scholar]
  2. Beukema, H., M. van Noordwijk, et al. Biodiversity in rubber agroforests. SRAP Workshop on Rubber Agroforestry Systems in Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia, 29-30 September 1997, Smallholder Rubber Agroforestry Project (1997). [Google Scholar]
  3. Boutin, D., Penot E, Wibawa G. and Akiefnawati R. Rubber Agroforestry Systemstype 1 (RAS1): a strategy towards a productive “jungle rubber”. IRRDB annual conference, Bogor, Indonesia, IRRDB (2000). [Google Scholar]
  4. Boutin, D., Penot E. and %Ilahang. Rubber Agroforestry Systems-type 3 (RAS 3), a strategy to convert Imperata grasslands. IRRDB annual conference, Bogor, Indonesia, IRRDB (2000). [Google Scholar]
  5. Boutin, D., Penot, E. Replantation des agroforêts à hévéa en Indonésie: Les systèmes agroforestiers améliorés à base de clones (RAS) ; une alternative à la monoculture ? Conférence internationale “avenir des cultures pérennes : investissement et durabilité en zone tropicales humides”., Yamoussoukro, RCI, Novembre 2001, ICRAF/CIRAD (2001). [Google Scholar]
  6. Budiman, A. F. S., Penot E., et al. RAS as alternatives for smallholder in Indonesia Integrated rubber agroforestry for the future of smallholder rubber in Indonesia. Conférence Nationale sur le caoutchouc, Medan (IDN), IRRI, Indonesia (1994). [Google Scholar]
  7. Chambon, B. De l’innovation technique dans les sociétés paysannes : la diffusion de la monoculture clonale d’hévéa à Kalimantan Ouest (Indonésie). Thèse de doctorat. Facultés des Sciences Economiques de Montpellier 1. Montpellier, France (2001). [Google Scholar]
  8. Chambon, B., Duangta, K., Promkhambut, A. & Lesturgez G. Field latex production in Southern Thailand: a study on farmers’ and traders’ practices that may affect the quality of natural rubber latex delivered to the factories. J Rubber Res. 23: 125–137 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-020-00043-x [Google Scholar]
  9. Courbet, P., Penot E. et al. Farming systems characterization and innovations adoption process in West Kalimantan. ICRAF/SRAP workshop on RAS (Rubber Agroforestry Systems), September 1997, Bogor (1997). [Google Scholar]
  10. Diaz-Novelllon S., Penot E., Arnaud M. Characterisation of biodiversity in improved rubber agroforests in West-Kalimantan, Indonesia. Real and Potential uses for spontaneous plants. Land-use, nature conservation and the stability of rainforest margins in Southeast Asia. International Symposium, September 29 October 3, Bogor, IndonesiaI/PB Bogor, University of Gottingen-University of Kassel (Germany) (2002). [Google Scholar]
  11. De Foresta, H. Smallholder rubber plantations viewed through forest ecologist glasses. An example from South Sumatra. ICRAF/SRAP workshop on RAS (Rubber Agroforestry Systems), Bogor (1997). [Google Scholar]
  12. Dijkman, M. J. %Hevea. Thirty Years of Research in the Far East. Coral Gables, Florida, University of Miami Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dove, M. (1993). Economic Botanic. 47, 2 (1951). [Google Scholar]
  14. Geissler, C., Penot E. “Mon palmier à huile contre ta forêt ”. Déforestation et politiques de concessions chez les Dayaks, Ouest-Kalimantan, Indonésie. Bois et Forêts des tropiques. 2000 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  15. Gouyon, A. Paysannerie et hévéaculture dans les plaines orientales de Sumatra : quel avenir pour un système agroforestier ?. Paris: INA-PG. 2:583 p.). Thèse de doctorat : Agro-économie : Institut national agronomique Paris-Grignon (1995). [Google Scholar]
  16. Laxman J, Wibawa G, Ilahang Akiefnawati R, Mulyoutami E, Wulandari, D and Penot E. Diversified rubber agroforestry for smallholder farmers : a better alternative to monoculture. Workshop on “Rubber Development in Lao PDR: Exploring Improved Systems for Smallholder Rubber Production”, Vientiane, Lao PDR, 9-11 May 2006 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. Penot, E. Improving the productivity of Smallholder Rubber Agroforestry Systems: sustainable alternatives. Project frame, general proposals and on-farm trial methodology. Bogor (IDN) :, ICRAF, 28 p., 4 tabl. ST: Working Paper (IDN) (1994). [Google Scholar]
  18. Penot, E. and A. Gouyon. L’hévéaculture paysanne Indonésienne: Agroforêt et plantations clonales : des choix pour l’avenir. Séminaire CIRAD-MES: succès et échecs des révolutions vertes, Montpellier (FR), CIRAD (1995). [Google Scholar]
  19. Penot, E. Project main features. Improving productivity of Indonesian rubber based agroforestry systems. Rubber Agroforestry Systems (RAS) as a challenge for the improvement of rubber productivity for smallholder through sustainability, biodiversity and environment. Introduction to Rubber Agroforestry Systems (RAS) in Indonesia. Bogor (IDN): ICRAF, 28 p. (1996). [Google Scholar]
  20. Penot, E. and Wibawa G. Improved Rubber Agroforestry Systems in Indonesia: an alternative to low productivity of jungle rubber conserving agroforestry practices and benefits. First results from on-farm experimentation in West-Kalimantan. IRRDB annual meeting, Beruwala, Sri Lanka, December (1996). [Google Scholar]
  21. Penot, E. From shifting agriculture to sustainable rubber complex agroforestry systems (jungle rubber) in the peneplains of Sumatra and Kalimantan in Indonesia: innovations in local rubber based cropping systems. World Bank report “Indonesia: upland agricultural technology study. 1997/02, World Bank. Published as a WB report in 2002 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  22. Penot, E. Prospects for the conservation of secondary forest biodiversity within productive rubber agroforests. CIFOR.USAID International Workhsop on” management of secondary forest in Indonesia”, Bogor, Novembre 1997 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  23. Penot, E. Associated trees with rubber in Rubber Agroforestry Systems (RAS). ICRAF workshop on “domestication of agroforestry trees”, Gadjah Mada University, Jogyakarta, November 1997 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  24. Penot, E. Budiman., A.F.S. Environmental aspects of smallholder rubber agroforestry in Indonesia : reconcile production and environment. International Rubber Conference, May 1998, Paris, France: 22 (1998). [Google Scholar]
  25. Penot, E. L’amélioration des agroforêts à hévéa en Indonésie. Plantations, Recherche, Developpement. 5 (n°2/98, Mars/Avril 1998): 12 (1998).. [Google Scholar]
  26. Penot, E., Ruf F., Courbet Ph. Tree crops triggers reforestation after deforestation in Indonesia? the case of rubber and cocoa : a comparison. Workshop on “When does technological progress in agriculture reduce deforestation?”, CIFOR, Costa Rica, 11. 12. March 1999 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  27. Penot, E. Chambon B. “Les agroforêts à hévéas améliorées en Indonésie; mythe ou réalité?” PRD 2000, Novembre, (n° 6) (2000). [Google Scholar]
  28. Penot, E. Ruf. F. Rubber cushions the smallholder: no windfall, no crisis. In “Agriculture in crisis : people, commodities and natural ressources in Indonesia, 1996-2000 “ edited by F. Gerard and F Ruf. CIRAD/CURZON. CIRAD/CURZON. Richmond, UK, Curzon Press, UK: p 237-266 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  29. Penot, E. Stratégies paysannes et évolution des savoirs : l’hévéaculture agroforestière indonésienne. Thèse de doctorat. Faculté des Sciences Economiques. Montpellier, Université Montpellier I.: 360p (2001). [Google Scholar]
  30. Penot, E. Diversification of perennial crops to offset market uncertainties: the case of traditionnal rubber smallholders in West-Kalimantan, Indonesia. IFSA, Orlando, November 2002 (2002). [Google Scholar]
  31. Penot, E., Wibawa G., Williams, S. Rubber Agroforestry Systems in Indonesia in Proceedings of the CIRAD/ICRAF workshop on Rubber Agroforestry Systems (RAS) as alternatives in Indonesia. Bogor, Indonesia, Septembre 1997. CIRAD/ICRAF, Bogor, Décembre 1999 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  32. Penot, E. “Le foncier : l’enjeu de tous les dangers” ou les relations Etat paysans dans les grande plaines hévéicoles indonésiennes. Evolution des systèmes de production hévéicoles et gestion de la ressource foncière : le cas de la province de OuestKalimantan, Indonésie. Conférence UMR/SAGERT : Organisation spatiale et gestion des ressources et territoires ruraux, Montpellier, Février 2003, CIRAD (2003). [Google Scholar]
  33. Penot E, Hébraud C. Modélisation et analyse prospective des exploitations hévéicoles en Indonésie : Utilisation du logiciel Olympe pour la définition de scénarios d’évolution en fonction de choix techniques et des aléas. Publié dans l’ouvrage co édité par Penot E. et Deheuvels O. « Modélisation des exploitations agricoles avec le logiciel Olympe ». Ouvrage collectif. Accepté par les éditions l’Harmattan, date de publication Janvier 2007 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  34. Penot E. From Shifting Cultivation to Sustainable Jungle Rubber: A History of Innovations in Indonesia. Chapter 48 of the book Voices from the Forest Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Sustainable Upland Farming. Malcolm Cairns, editor. 2006. Browse Book. 880 p. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  35. Penot E. Editor, CD ROM : “10 années de recherche du SRAP en Indonésie : 1993-2003”. Recueil de l’ensemble des publications de l’équipe du SRAP entre 1993 et 2003 (2004). [Google Scholar]
  36. Penot E. Exploitations agricoles, stratégies paysannes et politiques publiques. Les apports du modèle Olympe sous la direction de Éric Penot. Editions Quae, Versailles. Collection « Update Sciences & Technology. Janvier 2012. 350 p. (2012). [Google Scholar]
  37. Prasetyo LB and Kumazaki M. Land use changes and their causes in the tropics: a case study in South-Sumatra, Indonesia in 1969-1988. Tropics. 5, 1/2 (1995). [Google Scholar]
  38. Sethuraj, M. R. Impact of natural rubber plantations on environment. Seminar on National Rubber as an Environmenttally friendy raw material and a renewable resource. Trivandum, India -September 1996 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  39. Schueller, W. Production et utilisation du matériel végétal amélioré d’hévéa brasiliensis par les petits planteurs de la province de Kalimantan Ouest, Indonésie. Mémoire de fin d’études ENITA. Bordeaux, Novembre 1997 (1997). [Google Scholar]
  40. Sivanadyan K and Norhayati Moris. Consequences of transforming tropical rainforest to Hevea plantations. Presented at the FADINAP regional seminar on fertilization and environment, Chang Mai, Thailand. RRIM (1992). [Google Scholar]
  41. Werner, S. Biodiversity of jungle rubber in West-Kalimantan. ICRAF/SRAP workshop on RAS (Rubber Agoforestry Systems), Bogor (1997). [Google Scholar]
  42. Wan Abdul Rahaman, Wan Yacoob & Jones K. Rubber as a green commodity. Paper presented at the International seminar on natural rubber as an environmentally friendly raw material and a renewable resource. Trivandum, India (1996). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.