Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 310, 2021
Annual International Scientific Conference “Spatial Data: Science, Research and Technology 2021”
Article Number 06001
Number of page(s) 9
Section General and Special Purpose Cartographic Models. Land and Information Systems. Land Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131006001
Published online 15 October 2021
  1. Mabele Bangou Creole Passover. Fundamentals of the geographic information database of the specially protected natural areas of the Republic of Congo, «Proceedings of the Higher Educational Institutions. Izvestia vuzov «Geodesy and aerophotosurveying» 64 5, 596–607, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. K. Sahatqija, J. Ajdari, X. Zenuni, B. Raufi, F. Ismaili. Comparison between relational and NOSQL databases, 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 0216-0221, (2018) doi: 10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400041. [Google Scholar]
  3. W. Ali, M. U. Shafique, M. A. Majeed, A. Raza. Comparison between SQL and NoSQL Databases and Their Relationship with Big Data Analytics, Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science, 4(2), 1-10, (2019) doi: 10.9734/ajrcos/2019/v4i230108 [Google Scholar]
  4. C. Divya, K. L. Bansal. Using the Advantages of NOSQL: A Case Study on MongoDB, International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 5.2, 90–93. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Grippa, S. Georganos, S. Zarougui, P. Bognounou, E. Diboulo, Y. Forget, M. Lennert, S. Vanhuysse, N. Mboga, E. Wolff, Mapping Urban Land Use at Street Block Level Using OpenStreetMap, Remote Sensing Data, and Spatial Metrics. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 7, 246, (2018) doi: 10.3390/ijgi7070246 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. Guo, E. Onstein State-of-the-Art Geospatial Information Processing in NoSQL Databases, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(5), 331, (2020) doi: 10.3390/ijgi9050331 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Varga, K. Janosi-Rancz, B. Kálmán, Conceptual Design of Document NoSQL Database with Formal Concept Analysis, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. S. Dubrovin, O. V. Ogorodnikova, E. G. Tsarkova, E. A. Andreeva, T. N. Kulikova, Analysis and visualization in graph database management systems, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1902, 012059 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Wan, C. Wu, J. Wang, Y. Qiu, L. Xin, S. Mullender, H. Mühleisen, B. Scheers, Y. Zhang, N. Nes, M. Kersten, Y. Huang, J. Deng, J. Wei, Column store for GWAC: A high-cadence, high-density, large-scale astronomical light curve pipeline and distributed shared-nothing database, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 128, 114501, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Yamaguchi, Y. Morimitsu, Improving Dynamic Scaling Performance of Cassandra, IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E100.D, 4, 682-692, (2017), doi: 10.1587/transinf.2016DAP0009 [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Voit, A. Stankus, S. Magomedov, I. Ivanova, Big Data Processing for Full-Text Search and Visualization with Elasticsearch, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 8(12), (2017), doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2017.081211 [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Holubová, S. Scherzinger, Unlocking the potential of nextGen multi-model databases for semantic big data projects, In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Big Data (SBD ’19), 6, 1–6. (2019) doi: 10.1145/3323878.3325807 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.