Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 311, 2021
International Conference “Ecological Paradigms of Sustainable Development: Political, Economic and Technological Dimension of Biosphere Problems” (EPSD 2021)
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Environmental and Social Responsibility
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131101006
Published online 19 October 2021
  1. P. W. Schultz, V. V. Gouveia, L. D. Cameron, G. Tankha, P. Schmuck, M. Franěk, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. J. I. De Groot, L. Steg, Environment and Behavior, 40, 330 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. F. G. Kaiser, M. Ranney, T. Hartig, P.A. Bowler, European psychologist, 4(2), 59 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Wright, В. Klyn, Journal of Empirical Generalisations in Marketing Science, 4, 42 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  5. V. I. Panov, Ecological psychology: Experience in constructing methodology (2004) [Google Scholar]
  6. V. A. Yasvin, Psychology of attitude to nature (2000) [Google Scholar]
  7. S. D. Deryabo, Ecological psychology: diagnostics of ecological consciousness (1999) [Google Scholar]
  8. I. A. Shmeleva, Psychological Journal, 32(5), 5 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. A. Bortnikova, Bulletin of the International Academy of Sciences (Russian section), 2, 113 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. E. G. Vinogradova, Economic and Social Research, 4(28), 70 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. X. Zhang, N. Ye, Proceedings of international symposium on green management and local governments responsibility, 51 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Paco, R. G. Rodrigues, International Journal of consumer studies, 40(4), 466 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. E. V. Ryabova, Humanities, Social-economic and Social Sciences, 5, 269 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. O. V. Petunin, A. A. Mzhelskaya, Innovations in Education, 5, 58 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  15. V. L Krainik, Zh. Zh. Sergazina, World of Science, Culture, Education, 3(70), 203 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  16. V. I. Panov E. V. Lidskaya, Vestnik MSU named after M.A. Sholokhov. Socioecological technologies, 1, 38 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Jovanovic, O. Miljkovic, O. L. Zivkovic, D. Sabic, D. Gataric, M. Dzinovic, Journal of environmental protection and ecology, 18(3), 1223 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Jovanovic, L. Živković, A. Sladjana, G. Dragica, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 317 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Liobikiene, R. Juknys, Journal of cleaner production, 112(4), 3413 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. P. Janmaimool, S. Chudech, Sustainability, 12(4), 1610 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, J. M. Gowdy, Rensselaer Working Papers in Economics, 0503, 67 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  22. S. Claiton, B.D. Irkhin, S.K. Nartova-Bochaver, Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 16(1), 85 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. A. Sorokoumova, E. I. Cherdymova, Psychological Science and Education, 26(1), 102 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.