Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 312, 2021
76th Italian National Congress ATI (ATI 2021)
Article Number 04003
Number of page(s) 10
Section Measurement and Monitoring of Systems and Installations, and Certification
Published online 22 October 2021
  1. Nabil Ghendour, Mahmoud Meribout, Abdelwahid Azzi, Review of measurement techniques for void fraction of two-phase flow through annulus, Measurement 165 (2020), 108196 [Google Scholar]
  2. A.M. Osman, A.M. Abdel-monem, Measurement of void fraction in pipes by nuclear trasmission based techniques, Annals of Nuclear Energy 152 (2021) 107994 [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu Zhao, Qincheng Bi, Yuejin Yuan, Haicai, L., Void fraction measurement in steamwater two-phase flow using the gamma ray attenuation under high pressure and high temperature evaporating conditions, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 49 (2016) 18–3020 [Google Scholar]
  4. Andrzej Krupa, Marcin Lackowski, Anatol Jaworek, Capacitance sensor for measuring void fraction in small channels, Measurement 175 (2021) 109046 [Google Scholar]
  5. Nikolas Libert, Rigoberto, E.M. Morales, Marco Jose da Silva, Capacitive measuring system fort wo-phase flow monitoring. Part1:Hardware design and evaluation, Flow Measurement and Instrumentation 47 (2016) 90–99 [Google Scholar]
  6. Pieter Gijsenbergh, Robert Puers, Permittivity-based void fraction sensing for microfluidics, Sensors and Actuators A 195 (2013) 64–70 [Google Scholar]
  7. Madhavi V. Sardeshpande, Sagar Harinarayan, Vivek V. Ranade, Void fraction measurement using electrical capacitance tomography and high speed photography, Chemical engineering research and design 94 (2015) 1–11 [Google Scholar]
  8. Q.Y. Yang, N.D. Jin, L.S. Zhai, D.Y. Wang, F. Wang, Experimental study of slug and churn flows in a vertical pipe using plug-in optical fiber and conductance sensors, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 107 (2019) 16–28 [Google Scholar]
  9. Claudia Esposito, Onur Yenigun, Jean-Baptiste Gouriet, Johan Steelant, Maria Rosaria Vetrano, Void fraction and speed of sound measurement in cavitating flows by the three pressure transducers (3PT) technique, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 112 (2020) 109949 [Google Scholar]
  10. Mao Takeyama, Tomoaki Kunugi, Takehiko Yokomine, Zensaku Kawara, Phase detection aided thermometry (PDaT) for two-phase flow, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 118 (2018) 492–497 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chao Wang, Ning Zhao, Lide Fang, Tao Zhang, Yue Feng, Void fraction measurement using NIR technology for horizontal wet-gas annular flow, Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 76 (2016) 98–108 [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Laggiard and I. Runkel, Detection Of Subcooled Boiling In A Pwr Using Noise Analysis And Calculation Of The Steam Void Fraction, Ann. Nucl Energy, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 49–54, 1997 [Google Scholar]
  13. Philipp Wiedemann, Alexander Döß, Eckhard Schleicher, Uwe Hampel, Fuzzy flow pattern identification in horizontal air-water two-phase flow based on wire-mesh sensor data, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 117 (2019) 153–162 [Google Scholar]
  14. Tong, L. S., Weisman, Joel. Thermal Analysis of Pressurized Water Reactors. Amer Nuclear Society, 3rd edition, 5/1996. ISBN-13: 978-0894480386 [Google Scholar]
  15. Amoresano, A., Langella, G., Di Santo, M., Iodice, P. Advanced Imaging Techniques for Multiphase Flows Analysis, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2017, 882(1), 012004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Montanaro, A., Allocca, L., Amoresano, A., Langella, G., A dynamic System Approach for the Experimental Characterization of a Multi-Hole Spray, SAE Technical Papers, 2017 [Google Scholar]
  17. Allocca, L., Montanaro, A., Amoresano, A., Langella, G., Niola, V., Quaremba, G., Chaos Theory Approach as Advanced Technique for GDI Spray Analysis, SAE Technical Papers, 2017 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.