Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 312, 2021
76th Italian National Congress ATI (ATI 2021)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 10
Section Hydraulics and Pneumatics
Published online 22 October 2021
  1. P. Casoli, F. Scolari, T. Minav, M. Rundo, Comparative energy analysis of a load sensing system and a zonal hydraulics for a 9-tonne excavator. Actuators 9(2) (2020). DOI: 10.3390/ACT9020039. [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Padovani, M. Rundo, G. Altare, The working hydraulics of valve-controlled mobile machines: Classification and review. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 142(7) (2020). DOI: 10.1115/1.4046334. [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Casoli, A. Anthony, L. Ricco, Modeling simulation and experimental verification of an excavator hydraulic system - Load sensing flow sharing valve model. SAE Technical Paper (2012). DOI: 10.4271/2012-01-2042. [Google Scholar]
  4. F. Pintore, A. Benevelli, M. Borghi, B. Zardin, R. Morselli, F. Belluzzi, Modelling and simulation of the hydraulic circuit of an agricultural tractor. FPNI Ph.D Symp. Fluid Power (2014). DOI: 10.1115/FPNI2014-7848. [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Casoli, L. Ricco, F. Campanini, A. Lettini, C. Dolcin, Mathematical model of a hydraulic excavator for fuel consumption predictions. ASME/BATH Symp. Fluid Power Motion Control (2015). DOI: 10.1115/FPMC2015-9566. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Corvaglia, G. Altare, R. Finesso, M. Rundo, Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling of a Load Sensing Proportional Valve. ASME-JSME-KSME Jt. Fluids Eng. Conf. (2019). DOI: 10.1115/AJKFluids2019-4708. [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Frosina, G. Marinaro, A. Senatore, M. Pavanetto, Numerical and experimental investigation for the design of a directional spool valve. Energy Procedía 148: 274–280 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.08.078. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Olivetti, F.G. Monterosso, G. Marinaro, E. Frosina, P. Mazzei, Valve geometry and flow optimization through an automated DOE approach. Fluids 5(1) (2020). DOI: 10.3390/fluids5010017. [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Finesso, M. Rundo, Numerical and experimental investigation on a conical poppet relief valve with flow force compensation, Int. Journal of Fluid Power 18(2): 111–122 (2017). DOI: 10.1080/14399776.2017.1296740. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Rundo, G. Altare, Comparison of Analytical and Numerical Methods for the Evaluation of the Flow Forces in Conical Poppet Valves with Direct and Reverse Flow. Energy Procedía 126: 1107–1114 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.261. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Fornaciari, B. Zardin, M. Borghi, M. Ceriola, Analysis of the flow force compensation in relief valves with conical poppet. BATH/ASME Symp. Fluid Power Motion Control (2020). DOI: 10.1115/FPMC2020-2759. [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Lisowski, W. Czyzycki, J. Rajda, Three dimensional CFD analysis and experimental test of flow force acting on the spool of solenoid operated directional control valve. Energy Convers. Manag. 70: 220–229 (2013). DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.02.016. [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Amirante, L.A. Catalano, P. Tamburrano, The importance of a full 3D fluid dynamic analysis to evaluate the flow forces in a hydraulic directional proportional valve. Eng. Comput. 31(5): 898–922 (2014). DOI: 10.1108/EC-09-2012-0221. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Lisowski, G. Filo, J. Rajda, Analysis of Flow forces in the initial phase of throttle gap opening in a proportional control valve. Flow Meas. Instrum. 59: 157–167 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2017.12.011. [Google Scholar]
  15. R.S. Jackson, K.J. Cassaidy, M.M. Belger, A.R. Kokemoor, CFD simulation and experimental investigation of steady state flow force reduction in a hydraulic spool valve with machined back angles. ASME/BATH Symp. Fluid Power Motion Control (2017). DOI: 10.1115/FPMC2017-4323. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Frosina, A. Senatore, D. Buono, K.A. Stelson, A Mathematical Model to Analyze the Torque Caused by Fluid-Solid Interaction on a Hydraulic Valve. J. Fluids Eng. 138(6) (2016). DOI: 10.1115/1.4032295. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Rundo, P. Fresia, CFD Analysis of a Pressure Compensator for Variable Displacement Pumps, 22nd Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference (2020). DOI: 10.14264/44f591d. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.