Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Agribusiness
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131601001
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. N. Busthanul, P. Diansari, I. Sumase, N. M. V. Sulianderi, M. Syafiuddin, and I. Muhtar, in Adv. Environ. Biol. (2020), p. 17. [Google Scholar]
  2. N. Busthanul, P. Diansari, I. Summase, A. Amiruddin, N. Lanuhu, N. M. Viantika, S. Yusuf, and M. G. Permadi, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 343, 012110 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  3. Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan Kelautan Dan Perikanan Dalam Angka 2017 (Pusat Data, Statistik, dan Informasi, Jakarta Pusat, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. T. L. Kepel, D. D. Suryono, H. L. Ati, R. N. A. Salim, and A. A. Hutahaean, J. Kelaut. Nas. 12, 19 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. I. Khaldun, J. Sos. Polit. 3, 99 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Suparmi and A. Sahri, Univ. Islam Sultan Agung XLIV, 95 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  7. FAO, Globefish Res. Program. 124, 120 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan Republik Indonesia, Rumput Laut Dan Pemanfaatannya (Jakarta, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  9. W. Setianingsih, Medan Int. Conf. Econ. Bus. Appl. 2019 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  10. Kusumantoro, Din. Pendidik. Unnes 5, 147 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Murwaji and A. H. Robby, PADJADJARAN J. Ilmu Huk. (Journal Law) 4, 454 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  12. C. F. Sitepu and H. Hasyim, 7, 59 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. N. L. M. Mahendrawati, I. N. P. Budiartha, I. W. W. Antara, and C. S. Mandasari, Int. J. Community Serv. Learn. 4, 297 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. V. Milovanovic and L. Smutka, J. Co-Op. Organ. Manag. 6, 11 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. Sugiyono S., Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D (CV Alfabeta, Bandung, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  16. Susanto, D. Wisadirana, and M. Sholih, Wacana J. Soc. Humanit. 20, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Skyrius, G. Kazakevicienè, and V. Bujauskas, Int. J. Interact. Multimed. Artif. Intell. 2, 31 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  18. Mustangin, N. P. Islami, D. Kusniawati, B. Setyaningrum, and E. Prasetyawan, Int. J. Community Serv. Learn. 2, 77 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  19. L. E. Quezada, E. A. Reinao, P. I. Palominos, and A. M. Oddershede, Procedia Manuf. 39, 786 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Phadermrod, R. M. Crowder, and G. B. Wills, Int. J. Inf. Manage. 44, 194 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  21. H. H. Chang and W. C. Huang, Math. Comput. Model. 43, 158 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Sammut, Bonnici, and D. Galea, New Ventur. Creat. 373 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Prasetya, Iskandarini, and Salmiah, J. Agric. Agribussiness Socioenomics 1 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Zhou, P. He, Y. Qin, and D. Ren, Sustain. Cities Soc. 20 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  25. Ş. Şeker and M. Özgürler, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 58, 1544 (2012). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.