Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 316, 2021
2nd International Conference on Agribusiness and Rural Development (IConARD 2021)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 14
Section Agribusiness
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131601015
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Malkanthi and Routry, Potential For Agritourism Development: Evedance From Sri Lanka. The Journal Of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 61, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Akpinar, et al. Rural Women And Agrotourism In The Context Ofsustainable Rural Development: A Case Study From Turkey. Kluwer Journal 6: 473–486, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  3. Arifin M., et al., Model Pengembangan Agrowisata Dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan Kelompok Tani Tawangrejo Asri. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 32, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  4. Goodwin, R.D., Chaudhary, Suman Kalyan, Eco-Tourism Dimensions and Directions in India: an Empirical Study of Andhra Pradesh. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 83, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  5. Budiawarjono & Wardiningsih, S., Perencanaan Lanskap Agrowisata Berkelanjutan Kawasan Gunung Leutik Bogor. Jurnal Arsitektur NALARs. 122 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  6. Bwana, M.A., Olima, W.H.A., Andika, D. Stephen G. Agong & Hayombe, P., Agritourism: Potential Socio-Economic Impacts In Kisumu County. Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). 203 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. Wyporska, K., & Mosiej, J., Technical Infrastructure For Environmental Protection At The Level Of Farms As A Factor Of Sustainable Rural Slamet Ifandi, Yustika Aulia Rahma / Biosaintifika 12 (3) (2020): 335–342 342 Development. Journal Economic and Environmental Studies, 101, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kambey, H.J., Sasmito Djati, M., Polii B., & Hakim, L., The development of Tampusu agrotourism area in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology (IOSR-JESTFT). 107, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  9. Khotibul, U., Siti, K., & Mohammad, Z., Strategy for Water Guava Agro-Ecotourism Development in Camplong District, Sampang Regency. Scientific Agroinfo Student Galuh, 63 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  10. Evgrafova L. V., Dynamic properties and economic efficiency of the formation of rural tourist destinations. International Scientific Journal 2 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. Das, B.R. and D.V. Rainey, Agritourism in the Arkansas Delta Byways: Assessing the Economic ImpactsInt. J. Tourism Res., 12 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  12. Sevgi T.R., An application of a women-oriented agro-tourism rural development model in improving local economy. African Journal of Business Management 522 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  13. www.desakarangtengah (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Pangestuti, M.E., Hanum, L. & Wahyudi, L.E., Development of Agrotourism in Kampung Kopi Amadanom. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies. 63 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  15. Wang, L., Cheng, S. Kui, Zhong, L. Sheng, Mu, S. Lin, Dhruba, B. G. C., & Ren, G. Zhu., Rural tourism development in China: Principles, models and the future. Journal of Mountain Science 101 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. BPS Bantul, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  17. Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  18. Galo, W., Metode Penelitian. Penerbit PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Jakarta, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  19. Nasution, Metode Research (Penelitian Ilmiah). Penerbit Bumi Aksara. Jakarta, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  20. Nazir, M., Metode Penelitian. Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia. Jakarta, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  21. Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung Remaja Rsodakarya, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Sriyadi and E. Istiyanti, Agritourism Development Model Based on Local Wisdom in Karangtengah Village Imogiri Bantul DIY, E3S Web Conf. 232, 02027 (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.