Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 01084
Number of page(s) 10
Section Culture and Environment
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. D. E. Irawan., A. Pangarso., I. A. Ridlo, and A. Fuad. Telaah bibliometrik pola penyebaran pengetahuan tentang COVID-19 di dunia, 1–15 (2020) doi: [Google Scholar]
  2. UNDP. Socio-economic impact of COVID-19. (2020) Retrivied from [Google Scholar]
  3. UNICEF. Rapid situation tracking for COVID-19 socioeconomic impacts. (2020) Retrivied from [Google Scholar]
  4. M. A. Zambrano-Monserrate., M. A. Ruano., L. Sanchez-Alcalde. Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment, Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138813 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813 [Google Scholar]
  5. P. K. Ozili. COVID-19 in Africa: Socioeconomic Impact, Policy Response and Opportunities, SSRN Electron. J. (2020) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3574767 [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Nicola et al. The Socio-Economic Implications of the Coronavirus and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review, Int. J. Surg. 78, 185–193 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018 [Google Scholar]
  7. V. Stojkoski, Z. Utkovski, P. Jolakoski, D. Tevdovski, and L. Kocarev. The Socio-Economic Determinants of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic, SSRN Electron. J. 1–30 (2020) doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3576037 [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Saadat, D. Rawtani, and C. M. Hussain. Environmental perspective of COVID-19, Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138870 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138870 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. H. Rahdari. Developing a fuzzy corporate performance rating system: A petrochemical industry case study, J. Clean. Prod. 131, 421–434 (2016) doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Mitręga, V. Spáčil, and G. Pfajfar. Is partner knowledge equally important for businesses from post-communist countries? – comparative study of polish and Slovenian companies, J. East Eur. Manag. Stud. 24, 155–177 (2019) doi: 10.5771/0949-6181-2019-1-155 [Google Scholar]
  11. ILO. Supporting small and medium enterprises through the COVID-19 crisis (2020) Retrivied from–en/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Hadi, U. I. Indonesia, S. Supardi, and U. M. Kudus. Revitalization Strategy for Small and Medium Enterprises after Corona Virus Disease Pandemic (Covid-19) in Yogyakarta (2020) doi: 10.37896/JXAT12.04/1149 [Google Scholar]
  13. F. Fitriasari. How do Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) survive the COVID-19 outbreak? J. Inov. Ekon. 5 (2020) doi: 10.22219/JIKO.V5I3.11838. [Google Scholar]
  14. M. A. Ganaie, M. Enterprises, D. Authority, and F. Zafar. Survey Report: Impact of COVID-19 on SMEs Policy & Planning Division (2020) doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21236.09607 [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Jribi, H. Ben Ismail, D. Doggui, and H. Debbabi. COVID-19 virus outbreak lockdown: What impacts on household food wastage? Environ. Dev. Sustain. 22, 3939–3955 (2020) doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00740-y [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Yezli and A. Khan. COVID-19 social distancing in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Bold measures in the face of political, economic, social and religious challenges, Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 101692 (2020) doi: [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Chevance et al. Ensuring mental health care during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in France: A narrative review, Encephale, 1–11 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.03.001 [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Bruinen de Bruin et al. Initial impacts of global risk mitigation measures taken during the combatting of the COVID-19 pandemic, Saf. Sci. 128, 104773 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104773 [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Yuan, Y. Lu, X. Cao, and H. Cui. Regulating wildlife conservation and food safety to prevent human exposure to novel virus, Ecosyst. Heal. Sustain. 6 (2020) doi: 10.1080/20964129.2020.1741325 [Google Scholar]
  20. J. Cheah, A. Amran, and S. Yahya. Internal oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: How can social enterprises help themselves before helping others? J. Clean. Prod. 211, 607–619 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.203 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. Cheah, A. Amran, and S. Yahya. External oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: The dominant mediating role of formal business planning, J. Clean. Prod. 236, 117693 (2019) doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117693. [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Widhiastuti, R. Setiyani, Kardiyem, and W. Rahmaningtyas. The role of responsibility feeling in mediating the effects of the environmental education course, socio-economic conditions, and awareness as the caliph on environmental behavior, J. Environ. Manag. Tour. 10, 1, 53–62 (2019) doi: 10.14505/jemt.v10.1(33).06 [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Megasari, Y. Budiawati, and A. Mulyaningsih. Factors affecting participation of women farmers in supporting family food security: Case study in Pandeglang regency, Indonesia, in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 383 (2019) doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/383/1/012038 [Google Scholar]
  24. M. B. Pietrzak, A. P. Balcerzak, A. Gajdos, and Ł. Arendt. Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: The case of polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development, Entrep. Sustain. Issues. 5, 2, 190–203 (2017) doi: 10.9770/jesi.2017.5.2(2) [Google Scholar]
  25. L. L. Gilson and C. B. Goldberg. Editors’ Comment: So, What Is a Conceptual Paper?, Gr. Organ. Manag. 40, 127–130 (2015) doi: 10.1177/1059601115576425 [Google Scholar]
  26. F. Franceschini, D. Maisano, and L. Mastrogiacomo. Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of Science, J. Informetr. 10, 933–953 (2016) doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Benitez, J. Henseler, A. Castillo, and F. Schuberth. How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research, Inf. Manag. 57, 103168 (2020) doi: 10.1016/ [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Henseler et al. Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013), Organ. Res. Methods. 17, 182–209 (2014) doi: 10.1177/1094428114526928 [Google Scholar]
  29. W. L. Shiau, M. Sarstedt, and J. F. Hair. Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), Internet Res. 29, 398–406 (2019) doi: 10.1108/IntR-10-2018-0447 [Google Scholar]
  30. F. Ali, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, and K. Ryu. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research, Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 30, 514–538 (2018) doi: 10.1108/IJCHM-10-2016-0568 [Google Scholar]
  31. C. M. Ringle, M. Sarstedt, R. Mitchell, and P. Siegfried, Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research, Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 5192, 1–27 (2018) doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1416655 [Google Scholar]
  32. H. Karadag. The impact of industry, firm age and education level on financial management performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Evidence from Turkey, J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 9, 300–314, (2017) doi: 10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0037 [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Pangarso, E. S. Astuti, K. Raharjo, and T. W. Afrianty. The impact of absorptive capacity and innovation ambidexterity on sustainable competitive advantage: the case of Indonesian higher education, Entrep. Sustain. Issues. 7, 2436–2455 (2020) doi: 10.9770/jesi.2020.7.3(65) [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Pangarso, E. S. Astuti, K. Raharjo, and T. W. Afrianty. Data of innovation ambidexterity as a mediator in the absorptive capacity effect on sustainable competitive advantage, Data Br. 29, 105200 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105200 [Google Scholar]
  35. J. González-Benito, G. Lannelongue, and D. Queiruga. Stakeholders and environmental management systems: A synergistic influence on environmental imbalance, J. Clean. Prod. 19, 1622–1630 (2011) doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.05.013 [Google Scholar]
  36. S. Gautam, The Influence of COVID-19 on Air Quality in India: A Boon or Inutile, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 104, 724–726 (2020) doi: 10.1007/s00128-020-02877-y [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Lal et al., The dark cloud with a silver lining: Assessing the impact of the SARS COVID-19 pandemic on the global environment, Sci. Total Environ. 732, 139297 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139297 [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Sharma, M. Zhang, Anshika, J. Gao, H. Zhang, and S. H. Kota. Effect of restricted emissions during COVID-19 on air quality in India, Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138878 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138878 [Google Scholar]
  39. I. Chakraborty and P. Maity. COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention,” Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138882 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882 [Google Scholar]
  40. Q. Wang and M. Su. A preliminary assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on environment – A case study of China, Sci. Total Environ. 728, 138915 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138915 [Google Scholar]
  41. A. P. Yunus, Y. Masago, and Y. Hijioka. COVID-19 and surface water quality: Improved lake water quality during the lockdown, Sci. Total Environ. 731, 139012 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139012 [Google Scholar]
  42. S. Mahato, S. Pal, and K. G. Ghosh. Effect of lockdown amid COVID-19 pandemic on air quality of the megacity Delhi, India , Sci. Total Environ.730, 139086 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139086 [Google Scholar]
  43. L. Li et al. Air quality changes during the COVID-19 lockdown over the Yangtze River Delta Region: An insight into the impact of human activity pattern changes on air pollution variation, Sci. Total Environ. 732 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139282 [Google Scholar]
  44. K. D. Kanniah, N. A. F. Kamarul Zaman, D. G. Kaskaoutis, and M. T. Latif. COVID-19’s impact on the atmospheric environment in the Southeast Asia region, Sci. Total Environ. 736, 139658 (2020) doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139658 [Google Scholar]
  45. P. Caligiuri, H. De Cieri, D. Minbaeva, A. Verbeke, and A. Zimmermann. International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice, Journal of International Business Studies. Palgrave Macmillan Ltd., 1(2020) doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00335-9 [Google Scholar]
  46. B. Wernerfelt. The Resource-Based view of the firm, Strateg. Manag. J. 5, no. April 1983, 171–180 (1984) doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207 [Google Scholar]
  47. J. Barney. Firm Resources and Susteined Competitive Advantage, J. Manage.17, 99–120 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  48. I. Ajzen. The theory of planned behavior, Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179–211 (1991) doi: 10.4135/9781446249215.n22. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.