EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 317 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 317 (2021) 01087 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 01087
Number of page(s) 13
Section Culture and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131701087
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Gugus Tugas Pengarusutamaan Pengurangan Risiko Bencana dalam Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Strategi pengarusutamaan pengurangan risiko bencana di sekolah. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional; 2010. p. 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  2. Roadmap sekolah/madrasah aman. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 2015. p. 1–54. [Google Scholar]
  3. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. DIBI [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Mar 3]. Available from: http://dibi.bnpb.go.id/ [Google Scholar]
  4. Kurikulum 2013. Indonesia: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 2013. p. 1–138. [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Widowati, H. Koesyanto, Sugiharto. The application of safety education in primary school directorate in Indonesia. J Educ Learn. 2018;12(3):487–92. [Google Scholar]
  6. F. E. Hutasoit, E. Widowati. Gambaran penerapan safety education (pendidikan keselamatan) di sekolah dasar. J Heal Educ. 2017;2(1):66–72. [Google Scholar]
  7. A. R. Elangovan, S. Kasi. Psychosocial disaster preparedness for school children by teachers. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct [Internet]. Elsevier; 2015;12:119–24. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.12.007 [Google Scholar]
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School health index a self-assessment and planning guide [Internet]. Elementary. Georgia; 2017. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov//HealthySchools/SHI/ [Google Scholar]
  9. J-J. Wang. Study on the context of school-based disaster management. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct [Internet]. Elsevier Ltd; 2016;19:224–34. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  10. A. E. Olowokere, F. A. Okanlawon. Assessment of vulnerability status of public school children and existing school health programmes in Osun State, Nigeria. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2016;4:42–50. [Google Scholar]
  11. E. Widowati, A. H. Husodo, W. Istiono, M. L. Lazuardi. The utilization of mhealth for assessing child safety education is a necessity. In: 5th International Conference on Physical Education, Sport, and Health (ACPES 2019). Atlantis Press; 2019. p. 268–72. [Google Scholar]
  12. Y. Luo, M. Van den Brand, Z. Li, A. K. Saberi. A systematic approach and tool support for GSN-based safety case assessment. J Syst Archit. Elsevier; 2017;76:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Ghahramani, H. R. Khalkhali. Development and validation of a safety climate scale for manufacturing industry. Saf Health Work [Internet]. Elsevier; 2015;6:97–103. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2015.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  14. Hendryadi. Validitas isi: tahap awal pengembangan kuesioner. J Ris Manaj dan Bisnis Fak Ekon UNIAT. 2017;2(2):169–78. [Google Scholar]
  15. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penanggulangan bencana. Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 Indonesia; 2007 p. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Azwar. Penyusunan skala psikologi. 2nd ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2018. 7-10 p. [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Koswara, Triyono. Panduan monitoring dan evaluasi sekolah siaga bencana. Jakarta: LIPI Press; 2011. 1-46 p. [Google Scholar]
  18. C. P. Bradshaw, J. M. Kush. Teacher observation of classroom adaptation-checklist: measuring children‟s social, emotional, and behavioral functioning. Child Sch. 2020;42(1):29–40. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. H. Andrews, E. Cho, S. K. Tugendrajch, B. R. Marriott, K. M. Hawley. Evidence-based assessment tools for common mental health problems: a practical guide for school settings. Child Sch. 2020;42(1):41–52. [Google Scholar]
  20. T. E. Waasdorp, S. L. Johnson, K. D. Shukla, C. P. Bradshaw. Measuring school climate: invariance across middle and high school students. Child Sch. 2019;1–10. [Google Scholar]
  21. United Nations. Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015-2030. In: The Third UN World Conference. Sendai, Japan: UNISDR; 2015. p. 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  22. S. E. Wingate, R. R. Postlewaite, R. M. Mena, S. L. Neely-barnes, S. E. Elswick. Parent knowledge of and experiences with response to intervention. Child Sch. 2018;40(3):163–72. [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Goldin, M. K. O’Neill, S. S. Naik, F. Gomez, Zaccarelli. Supporting students‟ learning practices. Elem Sch J. 2019;119(3):000–000. [Google Scholar]
  24. S-H. C. Son, K. R. Butcher, L. A. Liang. The influence of interactive features in storybook apps on children‟s reading comprehension and story enjoyment. Elem Sch J. 2020;120(3):000–000. [Google Scholar]
  25. C. DeLuca, A. Pyle, A. Valiquette, D. LaPointe-McEwan. New directions for kindergarten education. Elem Sch J. 2020;120(3):000–000. [Google Scholar]
  26. N. D. Jones, E. Bettini, M. Brownell. Competing strands of educational reform policy. Elem Sch J. 2019;119(3):000–000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Y. L. Goddard, R. D. Goddard, L. P. Bailes, R. Nichols. From school leadership to differentiated instruction a pathway to student learning in schools. Elem Sch J. 2019;120(2):000–000. [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Yokoo, M. Wakuta, E. Shimizu. Educational effectiveness of a video lesson for bullying prevention. Child Sch. 2018;1–9. [Google Scholar]
  29. C. S. Nielsen, L. Hartman. Advancing our futures – educational potential of interdisciplinary artistic projects to children „at risk‟ in Denmark and South Africa. Policy Futur Educ. 2019;0(0):1–22. [Google Scholar]
  30. M. M. Bell, M. I. Singh. Implementing a collaborative support model for educators reporting child maltreatment. Child Sch. 2017;39(1):7–14. [Google Scholar]
  31. K. Tipler, R. Tarrant, D. Johnston, K. Tuffin. Are you ready? Emergency preparedness in New Zealand schools. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2017;25(September):324–33. [Google Scholar]
  32. V. A. Johnson, K. R. Ronan, D. M. Johnston, R. Peace. Implementing disaster preparedness education in New Zealand primary schools. Disaster Prev Manag [Internet]. Emerald; 2014;23(4):370–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2013-0151 [Google Scholar]
  33. K. S. Tipler, R. A. Tarrant, D. M. Johnston, K. F. Tuffin. New Zealand shakeout exercise: lessons learned by schools. Disaster Prev Manag [Internet]. Emerald; 2016 May 25;25(4):550–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-01-2016-0018 [Google Scholar]
  34. F. Parsizadeh, M. Ghafory‐Ashtiany. Iran public education and awareness program and its achievements. Disaster Prev Manag An Int J [Internet]. Emerald; 2010;19(1):32–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011022126 [Google Scholar]
  35. M. Aronsson-Storrier, K. da Costa. Regulating disasters? The role of international law in disaster prevention and management. Disaster Prev Manag [Internet]. Emerald; 2017;26(5):502–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-09-2017-0218 [Google Scholar]
  36. T. Jääskeläinen. Countering hate speech through arts and arts education: addressing intersections and policy implications. Policy Futur Educ. 2019;0(0):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  37. C. Chen, W. Lee. Damages to school infrastructure and development to disaster prevention education strategy after Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan. Disaster Prev Manag An Int J [Internet]. Emerald; 2012;21(5):541–55. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561211278680 [Google Scholar]
  38. C. Veronica Mellado De La, O. Stephanie Al, H. Yu-Yu, C. Nathan J. Francesca G, R. Brenna K, B. Emily A, H-B. Shanna, S. Leslie E. The prevalence and stability of challenging behaviors and concurrent early literacy growth among kindergartners at reading risk. Elem Sch J. 2019;120(2):220–42. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.