Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 02016
Number of page(s) 7
Section Language and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131702016
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. I. Ismayanti, I. Djamhur, and L. Levyda, “Indonesian Tourists’ Preferences Influence of Conscious and Unconscious Motives,” The Winners, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 11, (2011), doi: 10.21512/tw.v12i1.680. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. Sone, “African Oral Literature and the Humanities: Challenges and Prospects,” Humanities, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 30, (2018), doi: 10.3390/h7020030. [Google Scholar]
  3. S. Anwar, R. Akbar, M. Akbar, and A. Azhar, “Measuring the Size of Under Ground Economy in Pakistan : A Microeconomic Approach Measuring the Size of Under Ground Economy in Pakistan : A Microeconomic Approach,” J. Appl. Environ. Biol. Sci., vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 84–93, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Zhang, “Cooperative language learning and foreign language learning and teaching,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 81–83, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Sri Rahayu, “Studi Literatur: Peranan Bahasa Inggris Untuk Tujuan Bisnis Dan Pemasaran,” vol. 1, no. 4, p. 149, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Setyanto, “Pentingnya penguasaan bahasa dan budaya asing sebagai pendukung utama sektor pariwisata,” (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. G. Raţă, I. Petroman, and C. Petroman, The English of Tourism The English of Tourism, no. November. Newxastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholar Publishing, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Maxwell et al., “A qualitative study of primary care professionals’ views of case finding for depression in patients with diabetes or coronary heart disease in the UK,” BMC Fam. Pract., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–8, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research methods in education. routledge, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  10. G. A. Bowen, “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 27–40,(2009), doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027. [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Shen and T. Chiu, “EFL Learners’ English Speaking Difficulties and Strategy Use,” Educ. Linguist. Res., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 88, doi: 10.5296/elr.v5i2.15333, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Rabiah, “Language as a Tool for Communication and Cultural Reality Discloser,” pp. 1–11, 2018, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/nw94m, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Abrar-ul-Hassan, “State-of-the-art review: Revisiting the ins and outs of ESP practice,” Prof. Acad. English, vol. 39, pp. 4–11, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Bagas Arwansyah, “Revitalizing Local Culture As the Basis for Scientific,” vol. 5, no. 1, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  15. P. Viitanen and P. Arhinmäki, Cultural Environment Strategy 2014–2020, no. March 2014. (2014). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.