Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 03016
Number of page(s) 6
Section Literature and Environment
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. Shao, X., & Purpur, G. (2016). Effects of information literacy skills on student writing and course performance. The Journal of Academic Librarianship Volume 42 No 3: 670-678. [Google Scholar]
  2. Hafizan, E.M.S., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 9: 142-146 [Google Scholar]
  3. Kruea-In, N., & Thongperm, O. (2014). Teaching of science process skills in thai contexts: Status, supports and obstacles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 141: 1324-1329 [Google Scholar]
  4. Mutlu, M., & Temiz, B. K. (2013). Science process skills of students having field dependent and field independent cognitive styles. Educational Research and Reviews, Volume 8 No 11: 766-776 [Google Scholar]
  5. Schroeter, C., & Higgins, L.M.. (2015). The impact of guided vs. self-directed instruction on students’ information literacy skills. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, Volume 23 No 1: 1-10 [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeidan, A. H., & Jayosi, M.R.. (2014). Science process skills and attitudes toward science among palestinian secondary school students. World Journal of Education, Volume 5 No 1: 13-24. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zeitoun, S., & Hajo, Z. (2015). Investigating the science process skills in cycle 3 national science textbooks in Lebanon. American Journal of Educational Research, Volume 3 No 3: 268-275 [Google Scholar]
  8. Nichols Hess, A. N. (2014). Online and face-to-face library instruction: assessing the impact on upper-level sociology undergraduates. Behavioral and Social Sciences Librarian, Volume 3: 132–147 [Google Scholar]
  9. Silk, K. J., Perrault, E. K., Ladenson, S., & Nazione, S.A. (2015). The effectiveness of online versus in-person library instruction on finding empirical communication research. The Journal of Academic Librarianship Volume 41: 149–154 [Google Scholar]
  10. Weightman, A. L., Farnell, D.J.J., Morris, D., Strange, H., & Hallam, G. (2017). A systematic review of informationliteracy programs in higher education: Effects of face-to-face, online, and blended formats on student skills and views. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Volume 12 No 3: 20-55 [Google Scholar]
  11. Gorman, E. F., & Staley, C. (2018). Mortal or moodle? A comparison of in-person vs. online information literacy instruction. Journal of Library and Information Services in Distance Learning: 219-236 [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Pavlovski and I. Dunder (2015). Information literacy assessment at the University of Zagreb: an undergraduate students’ perspective,” in Proceedings of 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics,: 695–699 [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Webber and B. Johnston (2000). Conceptions of information literacy: new perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science, vol. 26, no. 6: 381–397 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.