Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 03018
Number of page(s) 6
Section Literature and Environment
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus (covid-19) dashboard with vaccination data (2021). Retrivied from: [Google Scholar]
  2. F. Haghpanah, G. Lin, S. A. Levin, E. Klein. Analysis of the potential impact of durability, timing, and transmission blocking of COVID-19 vaccine on morbidity and mortality. E. Clinical. Med. Lanc. 35, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Krause, T. R. Fleming, I. Longini et al. COVID-19 vaccine trials should seek worthwhile efficacy. Lancet. 396, 741-743 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  4. O. J. Wouters, K. C. Shadlen, M. Salcher-Konrad, A. J. Pollard, H. J. Larson, Y. Teerawattananon, M. J. Challenges in ensuring global acess to COVID-19 vaccines: production,afforability, alocation, and deployment. Lanc. 397, 1023–1034 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Malik, G. M. Leung. What can we expect from first-generation COVID-19 vaccines? Lancet. 396, 1467-1469 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Carrieri, L. Madio, F. Principe, F. Vaccine hesitancy and (fake) news: Quasi-experimental evidence from Italy. Health economics, 28 (11), 1377–1382 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Jesson, L. Matheson, F. M. Lacey. Doing your literature review: Traditional and systematic techniques (2011) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Hart. Doing a literature review: releasing the research imagination (2018) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. P. Michel. J. Goldberg. Education, healthy ageing and vaccine literacy. J. Nutr. Health. Aging. 25, 698–701 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Wang, X. Lu, X. Lai, Y. Lyu, H. Zhang, Y. Fenghuang, H. Fang. The changing acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination in different epidemic phases in China: A longitudinal study. Vaccines, 9(3), 191 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  11. Director General Disease Prevention and Control Decree Number HK 02.02/4/1/2021 about Technical Instructions for the Implementation of Vaccinations in Order Coping with Coronavirus Disease Pandemic 2019 (COVID-19) [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Jain, S. Saurabh, A. D. Goel, M. K. Gupta, P. Bhardwaj, P. R. Raghav. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among undergraduate medical students: results from a nationwide survey in India. medRxiv (2021). [Google Scholar]
  13. K. Wang, E. L. Y. Wong, K. F. Ho et al. Change of willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccine and reasons of vaccine hesitancy of working people at different waves of local epidemic in Hong Kong, China: Repeated cross-sectional surveys. Vaccines, (2021), 9 (1), 62. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Dib, P. Mayaud, P. Chauvin, O. Launay. Online mis/disinformation and vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19: Why we need an eHealth literacy revolution. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, (2021). 1-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Wang, M. McKee, A. Torbica, D. Stuckler. Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  16. C. M. Pulido et al. A new application of social impact in social media for overcoming fake news in health. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17 (7), 2430 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  17. Health On the Net Code of Conduct. HONcode: principles - quality and trustworthy health information. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  18. J. M. Ball. Better Health Through Informatics: Managing Technology to Deliver Value, in O’Carroll, Patrick W.; Yasnoff, William A.; Ward, M. Elizabeth; Ripp, Laura H. Martin, Ernest L. (eds.). Public Health Informatics and Information Systems. Springer Science & Business Media (2006) [Google Scholar]
  19. Health On the Net Code of Conduct. HONcode: Certification for Websites with Web 2.0 elements. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  20. Number 36 Year 2009 Concerning Health. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  21. P. Rzymski, L. Borkowski, M. Drąg et al. The strategies to support the COVID-19 vaccination with evidence-based communication and tackling misinformation. Vaccines, 9 (2), 109 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Angeli, N. Valanides. Instructional effects on critical thinking: Performance on ill-defined issues. Learning and Instruction, 19 (4), 322-334 (2009). [Google Scholar]
  23. M. Z. Ferdous, M. S. Islam, M. T. Sikder I et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: An online-based cross-sectional study. PloS one, 15 (10) (2020). [Google Scholar]
  24. J. E. Richmond. Bringing Critical Thinking to the Education of Developing Country Professionals. International education journal, 8 (1), 1-29 (2007). Retrivied from [Google Scholar]
  25. J. A. Reich. Of natural bodies and antibodies: Parents’ vaccine refusal and the dichotomies of natural and artificial. Social Science & Medicine, 157, 103-110 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  26. J. J. Van Bavel, K. Baicker, P.S. Boggio et al. Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature human behaviour, 4 (5), 460-471(2020). Retrivied from [Google Scholar]
  27. E. A. Harrison, J. W. Wu. Vaccine confidence in the time of COVID-19. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 35, 325–330 (2020). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.