EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 317 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 317 (2021) 05022 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 317, 2021
The 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment, Epidemiology, and Information System (ICENIS 2021)
Article Number 05022
Number of page(s) 9
Section Information System Management and Environment
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131705022
Published online 05 November 2021
  1. R. Morrar, H. Arman, and S. Mousa, “The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective,” Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1–59, 2017, doi: 10.22215/TIMREVIEW/1396, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Humphreys, “Mining Productivity And The Fourth Industrial Revolution,” Miner. Econ., vol. 33, no. 1–2, pp. 115–125, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s13563-019-00172-9, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Wu, S. Guo, H. Huang, W. Liu, and Y. Xiang, “Information And Communications Technologies For Sustainable Development Goals: State-Of-The-Art, Needs And Perspectives,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 2389–2406, 2018, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2812301, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Szalavetz, “Industry 4.0 And Capability Development In Manufacturing Subsidiaries,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 145, no. June, pp. 384–395, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.06.027, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. H. A. Nguyen, H. Nguyen, H. T. Nguyen, A. C. Phan, and Y. Matsui, “Empirical Study On The Role Of Collaboration In New Product Development In Manufacturing Companies,” Int. J. Qual. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 363–384, 2018, doi: 10.18421/IJQR12.02-05, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  6. S. Price and C. Reichert, “The Importance of Continuing Professional Development to Career Satisfaction and Patient Care: Meeting the Needs of Novice to Mid- to Late-Career Nurses throughout Their Career Span,” Adm. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–13, 2017, doi: 10.3390/admsci7020017, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Yaseen and U. Farooq, “Requirement Elicitation Model (REM) in the Context of Global Software Development,” Int. J. Adv. Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.11591/ijaas.v7.i3. pp303-308, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. Z. Ali, M. Yaseen, and S. Ahmed, “Effective Communication As Critical Success Factor During Requirement Elicitation In Global Software Development,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 108–115, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Hehn and F. Uebernickel, “Towards An Understanding Of The Role Of Design Thinking For Requirements Elicitation - Findings From A Multiple-Case Study,” Am. Conf. Inf. Syst. 2018 Digit. Disruption, AMCIS 2018, no. September, pp. 1–11, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. M. Dale, J. E. Angus, S. Sutherland, S. Dev, and L. Rose, “Exploration Of Difficulty Accessing The Mouths Of Intubated And Mechanically Ventilated Adults For Oral Care: A Video And Photographic Elicitation Study,” J. Clin. Nurs., vol. 29, no. 11–12, pp. 1920–1932, 2020, doi: 10.1111/jocn.15014, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Taheri, M. Y. Shafazand, N. C. Pa, R. Abdullah, and S. Abdullah, “A Knowledge Audit Model For Requirement Elicitation: A Case Study To Assess Knowledge In Requirement Elicitation,” Knowl. Process Manag., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 257–268, 2017, doi: 10.1002/kpm.1553, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. A. Zamansky, D. Van Der Linden, and S. Baskin, “Pushing Boundaries of RE: Requirement Elicitation for Non-human Users,” Proc. - 2017 IEEE 25th Int. Requir. Eng. Conf., pp. 406–411, 2017, doi: 10.1109/RE.2017.30, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. F. Andry, H. Tannady, and F. Nurprihatin, “Eliciting Requirements of Order Fulfilment in A Company,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 771, pp. 1–6, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/771/1/012023, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  14. R. S. D. Astuti, A. D. Astuti, and Hadiyanto, “Preliminary Design of Industrial Symbiosis of Smes Using Material Flow Cost Accounting (MFCA) Method,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 31, pp. 1–7, 2018, doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20183104008, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Soori and M. Asmael, “Classification of Research and Applications of the Computer Aided Process Planning in Manufacturing Systems,” Indep. J. Manag. Prod., pp. 1–33, 2020, doi: 10.14807/ijmp.v12i5.1397, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  16. M. A. Bagherian et al., “Classification and Analysis of Optimization Techniques for Integrated Energy Systems Utilizing Renewable Energy Sources: A Review for CHP and CCHP Systems,” Processes, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–36, 2021, doi: 10.3390/pr9020339, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  17. C. Rujikiatkamjorn and B. Indraratna, “An Evaluation Of Vacuum Consolidation Performance Using Observational Techniques,” ICSMGE 2017 - 19th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. September, pp. 2643–2646, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. K. B. Ameyaw, K. N. Ofori, B. Adjepong, and H. D. Assem, “Using Observational Techniques as Assessment Instruments to Improve Learners’ Performance at Nkawkaw, Ghana,” IOSR J. Res. Method Educ., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 87–96, 2018, doi: 10.9790/7388-0806048796 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Schulz, V. Ferme, D. Okanovic, A. Van Hoorn, and C. Pautasso, “Behavior-Driven Load Testing Using Contextual Knowledge - Approach And Experiences,” ICPE 2019 - Proc. 2019 ACM/SPEC Int. Conf. Perform. Eng., pp. 265–272, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3297663.3309674, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  20. O. J. Okesola, K. Okokpujie, R. G. Worlu, A. Ogunbanwo, and O. Iheanetu, “Qualitative Comparisons Of Elicitation Techniques In Requirement Engineering,” ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 565–570, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. U. Rafiq, S. S. Bajwa, X. Wang, and I. Lunesu, “Requirements Elicitation Techniques Applied In Software Startups,” Proc. - 43rd Euromicro Conf. Softw. Eng. Adv. Appl. SEAA, pp. 141–144, 2017, doi: 10.1109/SEAA.2017.73, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Y. Lim, F. F. Chua, and B. B. Tajuddin, “Elicitation Techniques For Internet Of Things Applications Requirements: A Systematic Review,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 182–188, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3301326.3301360, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Wellsandt, K. A. Hribernik, and K. D. Thoben, “Qualitative Comparison Of Requirements Elicitation Techniques That Are Used To Collect Feedback Information About Product Use,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 21, pp. 212–217, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.121, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Yousuf, “Comparison of Requirements Elicitation Techniques,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 378–387, 2016, doi: 10.6088/ijacit.12.14005, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  25. M. K. Sabariah, P. I. Santosa, and R. Ferdiana, “Requirement Elicitation Framework For Child Learning Application-A Research Plan,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 129–133, 2019, doi: 10.1145/3305160.3305195, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  26. Y. Duan and R. Kinman, “Small Manufacturing Businesses: Meeting Decision Support Needs,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 272–284, 2016, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000006845, (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.