Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 318, 2021
Second International Conference on Geotechnical Engineering – Iraq (ICGE 2021)
Article Number 04009
Number of page(s) 7
Section Remote Sensing and Environmental Engineering
Published online 08 November 2021
  1. Kim, M.K., Wang, Q. and Li, H., 2019. Non-contact sensing based geometric quality assessment of buildings and civil structures: A review. Automation in construction, 100, pp.163–179. [Google Scholar]
  2. Galantucci, R.A. and Fatiguso, F., 2019. Advanced damage detection techniques in historical buildings using digital photogrammetry and 3D surface anlysis. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 36, pp.51–62. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jung, J., Hong, S., Yoon, S., Kim, J. and Heo, J., 2016. Automated 3D wireframe modeling of indoor structures from point clouds using constrained least-squares adjustment for as-built BFM. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 30(4), p.04015074. [Google Scholar]
  4. McClymont, A.F., Green, A.G., Streich, R., Horstmeyer, H., Tronicke, J., Nobes, D.C., Pettinga, J., Campbell, J. and Langridge, R., 2008. Visualization of active faults using geometric attributes of 3D GPR data: An example from the Alpine Fault Zone, New Zealand. Geophysics, 73(2), pp.B11–B23. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pulatsu, B., Sarhosis, V., Bretas, E.M., Nikitas, N. and Lourenço, P.B., 2017. Non-linear static behaviour of ancient free-standing stone columns. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 170(6), pp.406–418. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang, Y., Thambiratnam, D.P., Chan, T.H.T. and Nguyen, A., 2018. Damage detection in asymmetric buildings using vibration-based techniques. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 25(5), p.e2148. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sacks, R. and Barak, R., 2006, June. Quantitative assessment of the impact of 3D modelling of building structures on engineering productivity. In Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montréal. Anais… Montréal (pp. 1186–1195). [Google Scholar]
  8. Christovasilis, I.P. and Filiatrault, A., 2010. A two-dimensional numerical model for the seismic collapse assessment of light-frame wood structures. In Structures Congress 2010 (pp. 832–843). [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellobody, E., 2012. Behaviour of normal and high-strength castellated steel beams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 165(10), pp.529–542. [Google Scholar]
  10. Gupta, A., Behera, M.R. and Heidarpour, A., 2019. Numerical modelling of hydrodynamic impact of tsunami on coastal structures in the presence of curved sea wall. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018) (pp. 547–558). Springer, Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sampaio, A.Z., Cruz, C.O. and Martins, O.P., 2011. Didactic models in Civil Engineering education: Virtual simulation of construction works. IntechOpen. [Google Scholar]
  12. Castanheira, D.S., de Lima, L.R.O., da Silva Vellasco, P.C.G., da Silva, A.T. and Rodrigues, M.C., 2019. Numerical modelling of rectangular cold-formed steel and composite columns. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings, 172(11), pp.805–818. [Google Scholar]
  13. Merkl, C. and Taras, A., 2019. Towards automated identification of structural steel components from 3D-point clouds to subsequent GMNA-stability-analysis. Proceedings of the International Colloquia on Stability and Ductility of Steel Structures. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, H.N., Li, D.S. and Song, G.B., 2004. Recent applications of fiber optic sensors to health monitoring in civil engineering. Engineering structures, 26(11), pp.1647–1657. [Google Scholar]
  15. Song, H.W. and Saraswathy, V., 2007. Corrosion monitoring of reinforced concrete structures- A. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci, 2(1), pp.1–28. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yossef, M. and Chen, A., 2015. Applicability and limitations of 3D printing for civil structures. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Autonomous and Robotic Construction of Infrastructure, p. 237. [Google Scholar]
  17. Drews, A., 2008. Standard test method for characteristic groups in rubber extender and processing oils and other petroleum-derived oils by the clay-gel absorption chromatographic method. Manual on Hydrocarbon Analysis. [Google Scholar]
  18. Block, P., Ciblac, T. and Ochsendorf, J., 2006. Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings. Computers & structures, 84(29-30), pp.1841–1852. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sampaio, A.Z., Ferreira, M.M., Rosârio, D.P. and Martins, O.P., 2010. 3D and VR models in Civil Engineering education: Construction, rehabilitation and maintenance. Automation in construction, 19(7), pp.819–828. [Google Scholar]
  20. Warn, G.P. and Ryan, K.L., 2012. A review of seismic isolation for buildings: historical development and research needs. Buildings, 2(3), pp.300–325. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zahraei, S. M., Moradi, A. and Moradi, M., 2013. Topics in dynamics of civil structures. Volume 4, Proceedings of the 31st IMAC, A Conference on Structural Dynamics, 2013 (Vol. 39). Springer Science & Business Media. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.