Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 338, 2022
7th International Conference on Environmental Science and Material Application (ESMA 2021)
Article Number 01013
Number of page(s) 4
Published online 20 January 2022
  1. Reitenbach, Viktor, et al. “Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: a review of key issues.” Environmental Earth Sciences. 73.11 (2015): 6927–6937. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mazarei, Mehdi, et al. “The feasibility analysis of underground gas storage during an integration of improved condensate recovery processes.” Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 9.1 (2019): 397–408. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zheng, Dewen, et al. “Key evaluation techniques in the process of gas reservoir being converted into underground gas storage.” Petroleum Exploration and Development. 44.5 (2017): 840–849. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davarpanah, Afshin, Mehdi Mazarei, and Behnam Mirshekari. “A simulation study to enhance the gas production rate by nitrogen replacement in the underground gas storage performance.” Energy Reports. 5 (2019): 431–435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, Tongtao, et al. “Determination of the maximum allowable gas pressure for an underground gas storage salt cavern-A case study of Jintan, China.” Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. 11.2 (2019): 251–262. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Liu, Jun, et al. “Nonlinear flow-induced vibration response characteristics of leaching tubing in salt cavern underground gas storage.” Journal of Energy Storage. 41 (2021): 102909. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, Tongtao, et al. “Safe distance between debrining tubing inlet and sediment in a gas storage salt cavern.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 196 (2021): 107707. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bai, Mingxing, et al. “Well completion issues for underground gas storage in oil and gas reservoirs in China.” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 171 (2018): 584–591. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.