Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 340, 2022
The 13th of Aceh International Workshop and Expo on Sustainable Tsunami Disaster Recovery (The 13th AIWEST-DR 2021)
Article Number 02005
Number of page(s) 12
Section Technology and Infrastructure for Disaster Risk Reduction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202234002005
Published online 25 January 2022
  1. BSN (Badan Standarisasi Nasional): SNI 1726:2019, Tata Cara Perencanaan Ketahanan Gempa untuk Struktur Bangunan Gedung dan non Gedung. Badan Standarisasi Nasional: Jakarta. Indonesia (2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. BAPPENAS (Ministry of National Development Planning), Preliminary Damage and Loss Assesment; The December 26, 2004 Natural Disaster, Indonesia (2006). [Google Scholar]
  3. X. Duan, J.W. Pappin, A Procedure for Establishing Fragility Functions for Seismic Loss Estimate of Existing Buildings Based on Nonlinear Pushover Analysis, Presented on pada The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 12-17 October 2008, Beijing (2008) [Google Scholar]
  4. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), Guidelines for Design of Structures for Vertical Evacuation from Tsunami Third Edition. Department of Homeland Security FEMA Mitigation Division: Washington D.C. (2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Gentile, C. Galasso, Y. Idris, I. Rusydy, E. Meilianda, From Rapid Visual Survey to MultiHazard Risk Prioritisation and Numerical Fragility of School Buildings, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 1365–1386, (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Iemura, M. H. Pradono, M. Sugimoto, Y. Takahashi, A. Husen, Tsunami Height Memorial Poles in Banda Aceh and Recommendations for Disaster Prevention, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Engineering Lessons Learned from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, March 1-4, Tokyo, Japan (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Koshimura, Y. Namegaya, H. Yanagisawa, Tsunami Fragility: A New Measure to Identify Tsunami Damage. Journal of Disaster Research. Vol. 4, No. 6, 479–488, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. National Institute of Building Science (NIBS). HAZUS (Hazard US), (1999): Earthquake Loss Estimation, National Institute of Building Sciences. NIBS:Washington D.C (2002) [Google Scholar]
  9. Y. A. Pranata, Evaluasi Kinerja Gedung Beton Bertulang Tahan Gempa dengan Pushover Analysis. Jurnal. Universitas Kristen Maranatha, Bandung. (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. T. Sugito, Tsunami, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung (2008) [Google Scholar]
  11. Suharjanto. Rekayasa Gempa. Kepel Press: Yogyakarta (2013) [Google Scholar]
  12. I. K. Sulendra, Evaluasi Dan Tindakan Pengurangan Kerusakan Bangunan. Jurnal. Universitas Tadulako, Palu (2011) [Google Scholar]
  13. Syamsidik, Benazir, M. Lutfi, A. Suppasri, L.K. dan Comfort, The 22 December 2018 Mount Anak Krakatau volcanogenic tsunami on Sunda Strait coasts, Indonesia: tsunami and damage characteristics, NHESS, 20(2), 549–565 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  14. Tursina, Syamsidik, Reconstruction of the 2004 Tsunami Inundation Map in Banda Aceh Through Numerical Model and Its Validation with PostTsunami Survey Data, IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 273 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. N. A. Wibowo, Pengembangan Kurva Kerapuhan Berbasis Incremental Dynamic Analysis Untuk Evaluasi Kinerja Seismik Jembatan Beton. Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik Universitas Sebelas Maret : Surakarta (2016) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.