EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 350 (2022) E3S Web Conf., 350 (2022) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 350, 2022
International Conference on Environment, Renewable Energy and Green Chemical Engineering (EREGCE 2022)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 6
Section Green Chemical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235001004
Published online 09 May 2022
  1. WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, New York (1987) [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Anthopoulos, Smart utopia VS smart reality: Learning by experience from 10 smart city cases. Cities, 63, 128-148 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Egger, S. (2006) Determining a sustainable city model. Environ. Modell. Softw., 21(9): 1235-1246. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.R. Kenworthy, The eco-city: Ten key transport and planning dimensions for sustainable city development. Environ. Urban, 18(1), 67-85 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Niza, L. Rosado and P. Ferrão, Urban metabolism: Methodological advances in urban material flow accounting based on the Lisbon case study. J. Ind. Ecol., 13(3), 384-405 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Rajaonson and G.A. Tanguay, A sensitivity analysis to methodological variation in indicator-based urban sustainability assessment: A Quebec case study. Ecol. Indic., 83, 122-131 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S.L. Huang, J.H. Wong and T.C. Chen, A framework of indicator system for measuring Taipei’s urban sustainability. Landscape Urban Plan., 42(1), 15-27 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Turcu, Re-thinking sustainability indicators: Local perspectives of urban sustainability. J. Environ. Plann. Man., 56(5), 695-719 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Yigitcanlar and S. Teriman, Rethinking sustainable urban development: Towards an integrated planning and development process. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Te., 12, 341-352 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Sharifi and A. Murayama, A critical review of seven selected neighborhood sustainability assessment tools. Environ. Impact Asses., 38, 73-87 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Burnett, City buildings – Eco-labels and shades of green!. Landscape Urban Plan., 83(1), 29-38 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Pincetl, Nature, urban development and sustainability – What new elements are needed for a more comprehensive understanding?. Cities, 29, S32-S37 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Haaland and C.K. van den Bosch, Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review. Urban For. Urban Gree., 14(4), 760-771 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L.J. Pearson, L. Pearson and C.J. Pearson, Sustainable urban agriculture: Stocktake and opportunities. Int. J. Agr. Sustain., 8(1), 7-19 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Kennedy, S. Pincetl and P. Bunje, The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ. Pollut., 159(8-9), 1965-1973 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Alawadi, Rethinking Dubai’s urbanism: Generating sustainable form-based urban design strategies for an integrated neighborhood. Cities, 60, 353-366 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Y. Feng, Y.W. Han, Q. Fan, X.P. Zhang and J.J. Liu, A visualized review of ecological planning and design based on bibliometrics from 1992 to 2017. Int. Rev. Spat. Plan. Su., 7(1), 101-116 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. N.J. van Eck and L. Waltman, Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538 (2010) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. D.J. Price and D.D. Beaver, Collaboration in an invisible college. Am. Psychol., 21(11): 1011-1018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Leichenko, R. (2011) Climate change and urban resilience. Curr. Opin. Env. Sust., 3(3), 164-168 (1966) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. S.E. Bibri, The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc., 38, 230-253 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Šubelj, N.J. van Eck and L. Waltman, Clustering scientific publications based on citation relations: A systematic comparison of different methods. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0154404 (2016) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. D. Haase, N. Frantzeskaki and T. Elmqvist, Ecosystem services in urban landscapes: Practical applications and governance implications. AMBIO, 43, 407-412 (2014) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Dobbs, D. Kendal and C.R. Nitschke, Multiple ecosystem services and disservices of the urban forest establishing their connections with landscape structure and sociodemographics. Ecol. Indic., 43, 44-55 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. M. de Jong, S. Joss, D. Schraven, C.J. Zhan and M. Weijnen, Sustainable–smart–resilient–low carbon– eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. J. Clean. Prod., 109, 25-38 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S.E. Bibri and J. Krogstie, Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc., 31, 183-212 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. van den Bosch, A.O. Sang, Urban natural environments as nature based solutions for improved public health – A systematic review of reviews. Environ. Res., 158, 373-384 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.