EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 367 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 367 (2023) 01008 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 367, 2023
The 2022 International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts (SCA 2022)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 11
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336701008
Published online 31 January 2023
  1. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy. 2020 [cited 2022 20 May]; Available from: https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy/oil.html. [Google Scholar]
  2. Esene, C., et al., Comprehensive review of carbonated water injection for enhanced oil recovery. Fuel, 2019. 237: p. 1086-1107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Riazi, M., et al. Oil Recovery Improvement Using CO2-Enriched Water Injection. in EUROPEC/EAGE Conference and Exhibition. 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisweswar, G., A. Al-Hamairi, and S. Jin, Carbonated water injection: an efficient EOR approach. A review of fundamentals and prospects. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2020. 10(2): p. 673-685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. W. Green, a.G.P.W., Enhanced oil recovery. SPE Textbook Series, . 1998: Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas. [Google Scholar]
  6. Abedini, A. and F. Torabi, Parametric Study of the Cyclic CO2 Injection Process in Light Oil Systems. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2013. 52(43): p. 15211-15223. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong, Y., et al. An Experimental Investigation of Carbonated Water Flooding. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sohrabi, M., et al. A Thorough Investigation of Mechanisms of Enhanced Oil Recovery by Carbonated Water Injection. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mosavat, N., Utilization of Carbonated Water Injection (CWI) as a Means of Improved Oil Recovery in Light Oil Systems: Pore-Scale Mechanisms and Recovery Evaluation, in Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research. 2014, University of Regina. [Google Scholar]
  10. Kono, F., et al. Laboratory Measurements on Changes in Carbonate Rock Properties due to CO2Saturated Water Injection. in Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Puntervold, T., et al., Modified seawater as a smart EOR fluid in chalk. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015. 133: p. 440-443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Adiputra, E., L. Mucharam, and S.D. Rahmawati. Experimental Evaluation of Carbonated Water Injection to Increase Oil Recovery Using Spontaneous Imbibition. in Selected Topics on Improved Oil Recovery. 2018. Singapore: Springer Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lake, L.W., et al., Isothermal, multiphase, multicomponent fluid flow in permeable media. In Situ; (United States), 1984. 8:1: p. Medium: X; Size: Pages: 1-40 2009-12-16. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kilybay, A., et al. Hybrid EOR Technology: Carbonated Water and Smart Water Improved Recovery in Oil Wet Carbonate Formation. in SPE Annual Caspian Technical Conference & Exhibition. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kechut, N.I., M. Jamiolahmady, and M. Sohrabi, Numerical simulation of experimental carbonated water injection (CWI) for improved oil recovery and CO2 storage. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2011. 77(1): p. 111-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Parkhurst, D.A., C.A.J., User’s Guide to PHREEQC (Version 2)--A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations, U.S.G. SURVEY, Editor. 1999, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR. [Google Scholar]
  17. Piñerez, I., et al., Core wettability reproduction: A new solvent cleaning and core restoration strategy for chalk cores. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020. 195: p. 107654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hopkins, P., T. Puntervold, and S. Strand, Preserving initial core wettability during core restoration of carbonate cores, in The International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts. 2015: St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shariatpanahi, S.F., S. Strand, and T. Austad, Initial wetting properties of carbonate oil reservoirs: effect of the temperature and presence of sulfate in formation water. Energy & Fuels, 2011. 25(7): p. 3021-3028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fathi, S.J., T. Austad, and S. Strand, Water-based enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by “Smart Water”: optimal ionic composition for EOR in carbonates. Energy & Fuels, 2011. 25(11): p. 5173-5179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Puntervold, T., S. Strand, and T. Austad, New method to prepare outcrop chalk cores for wettability and oil recovery studies at low initial water saturation. Energy & Fuels 2007. 21(6): p. 3425-3430. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Springer, N., U. Korsbech, and H.K. Aage, Resistivity index measurement without the porous plate: A desaturation technique based on evaporation produces uniform water saturation profiles and more reliable results for tight North Sea chalk, in Paper presented at the International Symposium of the Society of Core Analysts 2003: Pau, France. [Google Scholar]
  23. Duan, Z., et al., An improved model for the calculation of CO2 solubility in aqueous solutions containing Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl−, and SO42−. Marine Chemistry, 2006. 98(2): p. 131-139. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Spycher, N. and K. Pruess, CO2-H2O Mixtures in the Geological Sequestration of CO2. II. Partitioning in Chloride Brines at 12-100oC and up to 600 bar. 2004. [Google Scholar]
  25. Anderson, W.G., Wettability literature surveypart 1: rock/oil/brine interactions and the effects of core handling on wettability. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1986. 38(10): p. 1125-1144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Austad, T., et al., Smart Water EOR: Beneficios y Aplicaciones en Reservorios Clásticos y Carbonatos. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  27. Piñerez Torrijos, I.D., et al., Impact of Temperature on Wettability Alteration by Smart Water in Chalk. 2019. 2019(1): p. 1-11. [Google Scholar]
  28. Standnes, D.C. and T. Austad, Wettability alteration in chalk. 1. Preparation of core material and oil properties. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2000. 28(3): p. 111-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Standal, S., et al., Effect of polar organic components on wettability as studied by adsorption and contact angles. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1999. 24: p. 131-144. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wiebe, R. and V.L. Gaddy, The Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Water at Various Temperatures from 12 to 40° and at Pressures to 500 Atmospheres. Critical Phenomena*. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1940. 62(4): p. 815-817. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Bowker, K.A. and P.J. Shuler. Carbon Dioxide Injection and Resultant Alteration of Weber Sandstone (Pennsylvania-Permian), Rangely Field, Colorado. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 1989. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shiraki, R. and T.L. Dunn, Experimental study on water–rock interactions during CO2 flooding in the Tensleep Formation, Wyoming, USA. Applied Geochemistry, 2000. 15(3): p. 265-279. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wellman, T.P., et al. Evaluation of CO2-BrineReservoir Rock Interaction with Laboratory Flow Tests and Reactive Transport Modeling. in International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. 2003. [Google Scholar]
  34. Grigg, R.B. and R.K. Svec. CO2 Transport Mechanisms in CO2/Brine Coreflooding. in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  35. Austad, T., et al., Seawater as IOR fluid in fractured chalk, in Paper SPE93000 presented at the 2005 SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry. 2005: Houston, TX, USA. [Google Scholar]
  36. Riazi, M., Pore scale mechanisms of carbonated water injection in oil reservoirs, in Petroleum Engineering. 2011, Heriot-Watt University. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.