EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 372 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 372 (2023) 02020 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2023
2023 4th International Conference on Urban Engineering and Management Science (ICUEMS2023)
Article Number 02020
Number of page(s) 6
Section Urban Traffic Management and Logistics Service
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337202020
Published online 06 March 2023
  1. Huang Shanxiu, Chen Xiaoyang, Zhang Chuanxiang, Guo Jiaqi. Mechanical properties and energy evolution characteristics of concrete with different strain rates and carbon nanotube doping[J/OL]. Journal of High Pressure Physics:1-10[2023-01-09]. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen S. P., Chang S. J., Jia P., Yu T. Y., Wang L. K., Zhao J., Tan J. J. Preparation and mechanism of cellulose fiber reinforced panel concrete [J/OL]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage:1-8[2023-01-09]. [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Nasra M. Investigating the effect of the ultra-high absorbent polymer on the sealing property of concrete[J]. COGENT ENGINEERING, 2019, 6(15995501). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Li H, Yu Q, Zhang K, et al. Effect of types of curing environments on the self-healing capacity of mortars incorporating crystalline admixture[J]. CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2023, 18(e01713). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jia Yifan, Meng Zhe, Song Yajuan. Application of ultrasonic technology in food testing [J]. Journal of Food Safety, 2022 (29):162-164. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liang X.Y., Shen Z.Y., Huang M.J., Wang Z. Research and prospect of ultrasonic inspection method in non-destructive testing of wood [J]. Woodworking Machine Tools, 2022(03):1-3+11. [Google Scholar]
  7. Swacha P, Lipski A. Cracking of S355J2+N steel in the high-cycle and very-high-cycle fatigue regimes[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2023, 168(107388). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li Chun-Liang, Shi Tong-Fei, Fang Li-Yun, et al. Current status of ultrasonic inspection technology[J]. China Building Materials Technology, 2016, 25(5):133-133, 135. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen QD. Ultrasonic detection technology[J]. Urban Roads and Bridges and Flood Control, 2010(10):190192. [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang W. Development and application of ultrasonic nondestructive testing technology [J]. Metallurgy and Materials, 2022(4):119-120, 173. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao Jun, Dai Changqiang, Zhu Wanxu, et al. Experimental study of ultrasonic detection of assembled concrete structure joint compactness[J]. Concrete, 2018(12):122-125. [Google Scholar]
  12. Wei Zhe. Research on the use of ground-penetrating radar and ultrasonic method in concrete structure inspection [J]. Building Materials and Decoration, 2020(32):66-67. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang H-L, Wang S-L, Yuan X-S. Durability analysis of concrete based on nuclear magnetic resonance and ultrasonic flaw detection techniques[J]. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 2022, 40(1):40-45, 96. [Google Scholar]
  14. Shao, H.J., Li, Z.L., Xiao, Shuaipeng, et al. Mechanical properties and microstructure of concrete under the action of dry and wet cycles[J]. Silicate Bulletin, 2021, 40(9):2948-2955. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiao Shuaipeng, Li Zongli, Zhang Guohui, et al. Effect of thermal fatigue on mechanical properties and microstructure of concrete[J]. Silicate Bulletin, 2022, 41(3):825-832. [Google Scholar]
  16. Liu JZ, Long SG, Tang HX, et al. Ultrasonic time and frequency domain characteristics of bonded concrete structures[J]. Acoustics Technology, 2021, 40(5):614-623. [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang Hao. Research on ultrasonic detection technology for structural defects in steel pipe and concrete [J]. Jiangxi Building Materials, 2022(6):90-92. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu Weifeng. Quality inspection of steel and hybrid structures of highway bridges based on ultrasonic nondestructive technology [J]. China Highway, 2022(7):102-103. [Google Scholar]
  19. Monazami M, Sharma A, Gupta R. Evaluating performance of carbon fiber-reinforced pavement with embedded sensors using destructive and nondestructive testing[J]. CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 17(e01460). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gondim R M L, Bompan K F, Haach V G. Crosscorrelation for feature extraction applied to ultrasonic test for stress evaluation in concrete[J]. Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais, 2023, 16(4): e16402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Riminesi C, Cuzman O A, Moczko M, et al. Comparative interpretation of results after application of different non-destructive and portable techniques on historic concrete in the Centennial Hall in Wroclaw[J]. CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 17(e01409). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ali B, Azab M, Ahmed H, et al. Investigation of physical, strength, and ductility characteristics of concrete reinforced with banana (Musaceae) stem fiber[J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 61(105024). [Google Scholar]
  23. Turkey F A, Beddu S B, Ahmed A N, et al. Effect of high temperatures on the properties of lightweight geopolymer concrete based fly ash and glass powder mixtures[J]. CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2022, 17(e01489). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Datta S D, Sobuz M H R, Akid A S M, et al. Influence of coarse aggregate size and content on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete using non-destructive testing methods[J]. JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2022, 61(105249). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Loke C K, Lehane B, Aslani F, et al. Non-Destructive Evaluation of Mortar with Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Blended Cement Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity[J]. MATERIALS, 2022, 15(695719). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Kim R, Min J, Ahn E, et al. Assessment of degradation index in freeze-thaw damaged concrete using multi-channel contactless ultrasound[J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 349(128815). [Google Scholar]
  27. Alexandre Bogas J, Gloria Gomes M, Gomes A. Compressive strength evaluation of structural lightweight concrete by non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity method[J]. ULTRASONICS, 2013, 53(5):962-972. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Biswas R, Rai B, Samui P. Compressive strength prediction model of high-strength concrete with silica fume by destructive and non-destructive technique[J]. INNOVATIVE INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTIONS, 2021, 6(652). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Najim K B. Strength evaluation of concrete structures using ISon Reb linear regression models: Laboratory and site (case studies) validation[J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2017, 149:639-647. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Trtnik G, Kavcic F, Turk G. Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks[J]. ULTRASONICS, 2009, 49(1):5360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Demirboga R, Turkmen I, Karakoc M B. Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineral-admixtured concrete[J]. CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2004, 34(12):2329-2336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Duc-Hien L, Sheen Y, My N L. Fresh and hardened properties of self-compacting concrete with sugarcane bagasse ash-slag blended cement[J]. CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 185:138-147. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Turkmen I, Oz A, Aydin A C. Characteristics of workability, strength, and ultrasonic pulse velocity of SCC containing zeolite and slag[J]. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2010, 5(15):2055-2064. [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhang Wenliang. Research on ultrasonic field characteristics of concrete based on random media and its detection method [D]. China University of Mining and Technology, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. Liang X.Y., Shen Z.Y., Huang M.J., et al. Research and prospect of ultrasonic inspection method in nondestructive testing of wood [J]. Woodworking Machine Tools, 2022(3):1-3, 11. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.