EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 463 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 463 (2023) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 463, 2023
III International Conference on Improving Energy Efficiency, Environmental Safety and Sustainable Development in Agriculture (EESTE2023)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 11
Section Sustainable Development in Agriculture
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346301005
Published online 13 December 2023
  1. H. Guo, Y. Xia, J. Jin, and C. Pan, The impact of climate change on the efficiency of agricultural production in the world’s main agricultural regions, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 97 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  2. “IPCC — Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”, https://www.ipcc.ch/ [Google Scholar]
  3. B.M. Kogut, V.M. Semenov, Z.S. Artemyeva, N.N. Danchenko, Humus Depletion and Soil Carbon Sequestration, Eurasian Soil Science, 5 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Smith, Soil carbon sequestration and biochar as negative emission technologies, Global Change Biology, 22, 3 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. G.S. Galieva, P.A. Kuryntseva, P.Y. Galitskaya, M.S. Tagirov, S.Y. Selivanovskaya, Influence of chiken manure biochar on microorganisms and plants, Uchenye Zapiski Kazanskogo Universiteta. Seriya Estestvennye Nauki, 163 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Lehmann, M. C. Rillig, J. Thies, C. A. Masiello, W. C. Hockaday, D. Crowley, Biochar effects on soil biota – A review, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 43, 9 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  7. V.M. Nazaryuk, F.R. Kalimulina, Productivity of plants and carbon balance in the agroecosystems under application of mineral fertilizers and plant residues, Problems of agrochemistry and ecology, 4 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Chabbi, Aligning agriculture and climate policy, Nature Climate Change, 7, 5 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  9. Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration Negative Emissions Technologies and Reliable Sequestration (2019) [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Iu. Nesterenko, Approaches To Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Agriculture in the Russian Federation and the European Union, AIC: economics, management, 3 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Tisserant and F. Cherubini, Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation, Land 2019, 8, 12 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Zheng, Z. Wang, X. Deng, S. Herbert, B. Xing, Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil, Geoderma, 206, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Curiel Yuste, D.D. Baldocchi, A. Gershenson, A. Goldstein, L. Misson, S. Wong, Microbial soil respiration and its dependency on carbon inputs, soil temperature and moisture, Global Change Biology, 13, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Zhou, Z. Li, L. Shi, Y. Kuzyakov, J. Pausch, Microbial utilization of photosynthesized carbon depends on land-use, Geoderma, 428 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Cardenas, F. Santa, E. Kaštovská, The exudation of surplus products links plant functional traits and plant-microbial stoichiometry, Land, 10 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  16. A.A. Larionova, A.M. Yermolayev, S.A. Blagodatsky, L.N. Rozanova, I.V. Yevdokimov, D.B. Orlinsky, Soil respiration and carbon balance of gray forest soils as affected by land use, undefined, 27 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  17. U. Application, Chapter 11: N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application, Agriculture Forestry and Other Land Use, 4 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  18. F. Murphy, G. Devlin, K. Mcdonnell, Energy requirements and environmental impacts associated with the production of short rotation willow (Salix sp.) chip in Ireland, GCB Bioenergy, 6 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  19. L. Leppäkoski, M.P. Marttila, V. Uusitalo, J. Levänen, V. Halonen, M.H. Mikkilä, Assessing the Carbon Footprint of Biochar from Willow Grown on Marginal Lands in Finland, Sustainability, 13 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  20. Y. Kuzyakov, W.R. Horwath, M. Dorodnikov, E. Blagodatskaya, Review and synthesis of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil processes: No changes in pools, but increased fluxes and accelerated cycles, Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 128 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Lal, Managing Soils and Ecosystems for Mitigating Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions and Advancing Global Food Security, BioScience, 60 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  22. B.M. Kogut, V.M. Semenov, Estimation of soil saturation with organic carbon, Dokuchaev Soil Bulletin, 102 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  23. V.A. Kovda, B.G. Rozanova, Soil and soil formation (1988) [Google Scholar]
  24. D.S. Orlov, O.N. Biryukova, N.I. Sukhanova, Soil organic matter of Russia (1996) [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. A. Fedorov, V. V. Sukhorukov, R. G. Trubnik, Review: emission and absorption of greenhouse gases by soils. Ecological problems, Anthropogenic Transformation of Nature, 7 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. R. L. Ray, Soil CO2 emission in response to organic amendments, temperature, and rainfall, Scientific Reports, 10 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Maier, H. Schack-Kirchner, E.E. Hildebrand, D. Schindler, Soil CO2 efflux vs. soil respiration: Implications for flux models, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Zhao, Root exudates drive soil-microbe-nutrient feedbacks in response to plant growth, Plant, Cell & Environment, 44 (2021) [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Mammadova, Crop yield indicators with crop rotation of soybeans, winter wheat, barley and corn, Bulletin of Science and Practice, 8 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Van Zwieten, Enhanced biological N2 fixation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in an acid soil following biochar addition: dissection of causal mechanisms, Plant and Soil, 395 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  31. N. Rogovska, D.A. Laird, D.L. Karlen, Corn and soil response to biochar application and stover harvest, Field Crops Research, 187 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  32. J. S. Cha, Production and utilization of biochar: A review, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 40 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  33. B. Kavitha, P.V.L. Reddy, B. Kim, S.S. Lee, S.K. Pandey, K.H. Kim, Benefits and limitations of biochar amendment in agricultural soils: A review, Journal of Environmental Management, 227 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Laghari, Effects of biochar application rate on sandy desert soil properties and sorghum growth, Catena, 135 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  35. M.I.S. Gonzaga, C. Mackowiak, A.Q. de Almeida, J.I.T. de Carvalho Junior, K.R. Andrade, Positive and negative effects of biochar from coconut husks, orange bagasse and pine wood chips on maize (Zea mays L.) growth and nutrition, Catena, 162 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  36. K.C. Uzoma, M. Inoue, H. Andry, H. Fujimaki, A. Zahoor, E. Nishihara, Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition, Soil Use and Management, 27 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  37. P.A. Kuryntseva, P.Y. Galitskaya, S.Y. Selivanovskaya, Assessment of the possibility of using biochar with immobilized free-living nitrogen fixers as a fertilizer (vegetation experiments), Agricultural Scientific Journal, 12 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  38. “The Global Economy.com”, https://ru.theglobaleconomy.com/rankings/fertilizer_use/Europe/ [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.