EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 465 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 465 (2023) 02006 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 465, 2023
8th International Conference on Industrial, Mechanical, Electrical and Chemical Engineering (ICIMECE 2023)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 6
Section Symposium on Electrical, Information Technology, and Industrial Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346502006
Published online 18 December 2023
  1. Badan Pusat Statistik, “Nilai Ekspor 1 dan Impor 2 Migas (juta US$), 1996-2021,” (2022). https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2014/09/08/1004/nilai-ekspordan-impor-migas-juta-us-1996-2021.html [Google Scholar]
  2. M. I. al Irsyad, T. Anggono, C. Anditya, R. Iyung, D. G. Cendrawati, and R. Nepal, “Assessing the Feasibility of a Migration Policy from LPG Cookers to Induction Cookers to Reduce LPG Subsidies,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 239–246, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2022.08.003. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. I. Fitriana, A. Sugiyono, and Adiarso, “Substitusi Kompor LPG ke Kompor Listrik,” Pus. Pengkaj. Ind. Proses dan Energi – BPPT, no. December 2020, (2021). [Google Scholar]
  4. D. F. Hakam, M. Triani, I. P. Wirasangka, and S. Aisyah, “Economic Simulation of Indonesia’s Clean Energy Policy: Shifting from LPG to Induction Stove,” in FoITIC, (2020), pp. 252–256. [Google Scholar]
  5. D. F. Hakam, H. Nugraha, A. Wicaksono, R. A. Rahadi, and S. P. Kanugrahan, “Mega conversion from LPG to induction stove to achieve Indonesia’s clean energy transition,” Energy Strateg. Rev., vol. 41, no. April, p. 100856, (2022), doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2022.100856. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Dewanto, “DEN: Kompor Listrik Lebih Hemat dan Ramah Lingkungan,” Antara Kantor Berita Indonesia, (2021). https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2135714/den-kompor-listriklebih-hemat-dan-ramah-lingkungan (accessed Oct. 15, 2022). [Google Scholar]
  7. A. D. Ramirez, A. J. Boero, and E. F. Perez, “Carbon Footprint of Energy Systems: Liquefied Petroleum Gas Based Cooking VS Electricity Based Cooking in Ecuador,” Proc. ASME 2017 Int. Mech. Eng. Congr. Expo., pp. 1–8, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Aisyah, M. Triani, and R. Rasgianti, “Energy Efficency Analysis for Various Type of Electric Cooker,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1869, no. 1, (2021), doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Jiang, M. Qiang, and P. Lin, “Assessment of Online Public Opinions on Large Infrastructure Projects: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Project in China,” Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., vol. 61, pp. 38–51, (2016), doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Ridzwan Yaakub, M. Iqbal Abu Latiffi, and L. Safra Zaabar, “A Review on Sentiment Analysis Techniques and Applications,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 551, no. 1, pp. 1–5, (2019), doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/551/1/012070. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W. Medhat, A. Hassan, and H. Korashy, “Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey,” Ain Shams Eng. J., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1093–1113, (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2014.04.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. M. E. D. M. Hussein, “A Survey on Sentiment Analysis Challenges,” J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 330– 338, (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.jksues.2016.04.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Anstead and B. O’Loughlin, “Social media analysis and public opinion: The 2010 UK general election,” J. Comput. Commun., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 204–220, (2015), doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12102. [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Jiang, P. Lin, and M. Qiang, “Public-Opinion Sentiment Analysis for Large Hydro Projects,” J. Constr. Eng. Manag., vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 1–12, (2016), doi: 10.1061/(asce)co.19437862.0001039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Sutoyo and A. Almaarif, “Twitter sentiment analysis of the relocation of Indonesia’s capital city,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1620–1630, (2020), doi:10.11591/eei.v9i4.2352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Kurniawan, R. Kusumaningrum, and M. E. Timu, “Hierarchical Sentence Sentiment Analysis of Hotel Reviews Using the Naïve Bayes Classifier,” 2018 2nd Int. Conf. Informatics Comput. Sci. ICICoS (2018), pp. 104–108, (2018), doi: 10.1109/ICICOS.2018.8621748. [Google Scholar]
  17. We Are Social and Hootsuite, “Digital 2023 : Global Overview Report,” (2023). [Online]. Available: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023- global-overviewreport [Google Scholar]
  18. W. A. Akbari, T. Tukino, B. Huda, and M. Muslih, “Sentiment Analysis of Twitter User Opinions Related to Metaverse Technology Using Lexicon Based Method,” Sinkron, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 195– 201, (2023), doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i1.11992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. KAPUCUGİL İKİZ and G. ÖZDAĞOĞLU, “Text Mining as a Supporting Process for VoC Clarification,” Alphanumeric J., vol. 3, no. 1, (2015), doi: 10.17093/aj.2015.3.1.5000105108. [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Hutto, C.J. and Gilbert, “VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-based Model for,” Eighth Int. AAAI Conf. Weblogs Soc. Media, p. 18, (2014), [Online]. Available: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM14/paper/vi ewPaper/8109 [Google Scholar]
  21. V. R. Joseph, “Optimal Ratio for Data Splitting,” Stat. Anal. Data Min., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 531–538, (2022), doi: 10.1002/sam.11583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. A. Gholamy, V. Kreinovich, and O. Kosheleva, “Why 70/30 or 80/20 Relation Between Training and Testing Sets : A Pedagogical Explanation,” Dep. Tech. Reports, vol. 1209, pp. 1–6, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. D. M. W. Powers, “Evaluation: from precision, recall and Fmeasure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation,” no. January 2008, (2020), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.16061 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.