EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 468 (2023) E3S Web Conf., 468 (2023) 03005 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 468, 2023
ICST UGM 2023 - The 4th Geoscience and Environmental Management Symposium
Article Number 03005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Environmental Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202346803005
Published online 21 December 2023
  1. O.Z. Tamin, Concept Of Transportation Needs Management As An Alternative For Solving Urban Transportation Problems in DKI. ITB Urban And Regional Planning Journal. Volumes 10 (1), (1999) [Google Scholar]
  2. Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning, Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Number 16 of 2017 concerning Guidelines for the Development of Transit- Oriented Areas, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  3. C. K. Harmadi, S. Sulistyono, R. N. Listyawati, N. N. Hayati, R. Alfiah, Development strategy of Malang Kota Baru station area using transit- oriented development (TOD) principle approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1000(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1000/1/012026, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. R. Furlan, A. A. Mohannadi. An urban regeneration planning scheme for the Souq Waqif Heritage Site of Doha. Sustainability, 12(19), 7927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197927, (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Borchers, & R. A. Ribeiro, A framework for selecting bus priority system locations in medium-sized cities: A case study in Araraquara, Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2053–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.006, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. Staricco, E. B. Vitale, Implementing TOD around suburban and rural stations: An exploration of spatial potentialities and constraints. Urban Research & Practice, 13(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1541475, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  7. C. F. Daganzo, Structure of competitive transit networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 44(4), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2009.11.001, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. Redman, M. Friman, T. Garling, T. Hartig, Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. W. Newman, J. R. Kenworthy, The land use—transport connection. Land Use Policy, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-8377(95)00027-5, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. P. Calthorpe, The next American metropolis: Ecology, community, and the American dream. Princeton Architectural Press, (1993) [Google Scholar]
  11. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) 2017, TOD STANDARD, New York. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  12. R. Thomas, L. Bertolini, Defining critical success factors in TOD implementation using rough set analysis. Journal of Transport and Land Use. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.513, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. R. Cervero, The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Island press, (1998). [Google Scholar]
  14. H. S. Hasibuan, M. Mulyani. Transit-Oriented Development: Towards achieving sustainable transport and urban development in Jakarta metropolitan, Indonesia. Sustainability, 14(9), 5244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095244, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Hanly, J. Dargay. The Impact of land use patterns on travel behavior. Association for European Transport, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  16. B. P. Y. Loo, A. S. Y. Chow, Changing urban form in Hong Kong: What are the challenges of sustainable transportation? International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2(3), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310701517331, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. T. Borchers, R. A. Ribeiro, A framework for selecting bus priority system locations in medium-sized cities: A case study in Araraquara, Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(4), 2053–2063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.006, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. E. Broniewicz, K. Ogrodnik, Multi-criteria analysis of transport infrastructure projects. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 102351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102351, (2022) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Macharis, A. Bernardini, Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach. Transport Policy, 37, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.11.002, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. T. L. Saaty, How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-i, (1990) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. R. Banai, Transit station area land use/site assessment with multiple criteria: An integrated GIS-expert system prototype. Journal of Public Transportation, 3(1), 95–110, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. B. M. R. Oswald, C. Treat, Integrating GIS and AHP to prioritize transportation infrastructure using sustainability metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)is.1943-555x.0000245, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Benevenuto, B. Caulfield, Examining transport needs in the global south using a screening framework. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 102845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102845, (2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Karanganyar. Kabupaten Karanganyar dalam Angka 2023. (2023) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. A. Legowo, W. Sumadio, Nilai dan Pola Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Indeks pada Jalur Commuter Line Bogor-Jakarta Kota. Jurnal Wilayah dan Lingkungan, 9(2), 142–154. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/jwl.9.2.142-154, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  26. Badan Kebijakan Transportasi Kementerian Perhubunngan. Strategi Penyediaan Angkutan Umum Berkelanjutan, (2023) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.