Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 375, 2023
8th International Conference on Energy Science and Applied Technology (ESAT 2023)
Article Number 02012
Number of page(s) 4
Section Clean Energy Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337502012
Published online 27 March 2023
  1. S Y Liu, Jiang Y C, Yu S Y et al. Electric power supply structure transformation model of China for peaking carbon dioxide emissions and achieving carbon neutrality. Energy Reports 2022; 8: 541–548 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gabriela N S, Pedro R R, Alexandre S. Renewable hydrogen production to deal with wind power surpluses and mitigate carbon dioxide emissions from oil refineries. Applied Energy 2022; 311: 118631 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johansson D, Rootzén J, Berntsson T, et al. Assessment of strategies for CO2 abatement in the European petroleum refining industry. Energy 2012;42(1): 375–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang MQ. Organic Rankine Cycle power generation using low temperature waste heat in refinery and its benefit analysis. Petroleum processing and petrochemicals 2020; 51(12): 92–95. [Google Scholar]
  5. Pérez-Fortes, Mar, et al. Methanol synthesis using captured CO2 as raw material: Techno-economic and environmental assessment. Applied Energy 2016; 161:718–732. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fernândez-Dacosta C, Stojcheva V, Ramirez A. Closing carbon cycles: Evaluating the performance of multi-product CO2 utilisation and storage configurations in a refinery. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2018; 23: 128–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rafiee, Ahmad, et al. Trends in CO2 conversion and utilization: A review from process systems perspective. Journal of environmental chemical engineering 2018; 65: 5771–5794 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhou H, Yang S, Xiao H, et al. Modeling and techno-economic analysis of shale-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid fuels processes. Energy 2016; 109: 201–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kontou V, Grimekis D, Braimakis K. Techno-economic assessment of dimethyl carbonate production based on carbon capture and utilization and power-to-fuel technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2022; 157: 112006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang HF, Desideri U. Techno-economic optimization of power-to-methanol with co-electrolysis of CO2 and H2O in solid-oxide electrolyzers. Energy 2020; 199: 117498. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kobe K. A. Plant design and economics for chemical engineers (Peters, Max S.). McGraw-Hill; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  12. Li J Y, Ma X X, Liu H et al. Life cycle assessment and economic analysis of methanol production from coke oven gas compared with coal and natural gas routes. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018; 185: 299308. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.