Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 375, 2023
8th International Conference on Energy Science and Applied Technology (ESAT 2023)
Article Number 02011
Number of page(s) 4
Section Clean Energy Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202337502011
Published online 27 March 2023
  1. Frame D J, Wehner M F, Noy I, et al. The economic costs of Hurricane Harvey attributable to climate change [J]. Climatic Change, 2020, 160(2): 271-281. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiaobing Zhang, Jing Xu. Optimal policies for climate change: A joint consideration of CO2 and methane. Applied Energy 2018; 211: 1021–1029 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. BP. BP Energy Outlook 2021 edition; 2021; https://www.bp.com. [accessed 06 June 2021] [Google Scholar]
  4. Biswas J, Maxwell I E. Recent process-and catalyst-related developments in fluid catalytic cracking. Applied Catalysis 1990; 63(1): 197–258. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Guleç F, Meredith W, Sun CG, et al. A novel approach to CO2 capture in fluid catalytic cracking— chemical looping combustion. Fuel 2019; 244: 140150. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wei M, Qian F, Du W, et al. Study on the integration of fluid catalytic cracking unit in refinery with solvent-based carbon capture through process simulation. Fuel, 2018;219: 364–374 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Li S H, Sun X J, Liu L L, Du J. A full process optimization of methanol production integrated with co-generation based on the co-gasification of biomass and coal. Energy 2023;267:126566 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cao Y, Mihardjo L W W, Dahari M, et al. Waste heat from a biomass fueled gas turbine for power generation via an ORC or compressor inlet cooling via an absorption refrigeration cycle: A thermoeconomic comparison[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2021, 182: 116117. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Huang, Y, Yi, Q, Wei GQ et al. Energy use, greenhouse gases emission and cost effectiveness of an integrated high- and low-temperature Fisher-Tropsch synthesis plant from a lifecycle viewpoint. Applied Energy 2018; 228:1009–1019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhou H, Yang S, Xiao H, et al. Modeling and techno-economic analysis of shale-to-liquid and coal-to-liquid fuels processes. Energy 2016; 109: 201–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yu Han. Construction and comprehensive evaluation of industrial chain for carbon emission and utilization of coal to olefin; China University of Petroleum (Beijing); 2018. ( in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Delin Kong. Contrast of Processing Programmes of C4 Fractions from Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit. Contemporary Chemical Industry 2003; 2: 103–105. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Qianqian Song. The construction of carbon industrial chain of refineries and low-carbon refineries in China; China University of Petroleum (Beijing); 2014. (in Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Omar Y. Abdelaziza, Wafaa M. Hosny, Mamdouh A. Gadallac, et al. Novel process technologies for conversion of carbon dioxide from industrial flue gas streams into methanol. Journal of CO2 Utilization 2017; 21: 52–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Siyu Yang, Li Xiao, Andrzej Kraslawski, et al. Sustainability Assessment of the Coal/Biomass to Fischer-Tropsch Fuel Processes. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014; 2: 80–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Qin Z, Zhai G, Wu X, et al. Carbon footprint evaluation of coal-to-methanol chain with the hierarchical attribution management and life cycle assessment. Energy conversion and management 2016; 124: 168–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.