Open Access
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 382, 2023
8th International Conference on Unsaturated Soils (UNSAT 2023)
Article Number 03009
Number of page(s) 6
Section Cyclic & Dynamic Behavior of Unsaturated Soils
Published online 24 April 2023
  1. Borghei, A., Ghayoomi, M., & Turner, M. (2020). Effects of groundwater level on seismic response of soil–foundation systems. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 146(10), 04020110. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Stacul, S., Squeglia, N., & Morelli, F. (2017). Laterally loaded single pile response considering the influence of suction and nonlinear behaviour of reinforced concrete sections. Applied Sciences, 7(12), 1310. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lalicata, L. M., Desideri, A., Casini, F., & Thorel, L. (2019). Experimental observation on laterally loaded pile in unsaturated silty soil. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 56(11), 1545-1556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cheng, X., & Vanapalli, S. K. (2021). A numerical technique for modeling the behavior of single piles in unsaturated soils. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 337, p. 03012). EDP Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lalicata, L. M., Rotisciani, G. M., Desideri, A., & Casini, F. (2021). A numerical model to study the response of piles under lateral loading in unsaturated soils. Geosciences, 12(1), 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mokwa, R. L., Duncan, J. M., & Helmers, M. J. (2000). Development of py curves for partly saturated silts and clays. In New Technological and Design Developments in Deep Foundations (pp. 224-239). [Google Scholar]
  7. Sivakumaran, S. (2019). Development of a Verified Non-Linear Winkler Model for the Seismic Analysis of Piles in Improved Ground, M.S. Thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, U.S.A. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hashash, Y. M. A., Musgrove, M. I., Harmon, J. A., Groholski, D. R., Phillips, C. A., & Park, D. (2016). DEEPSOIL 6.1, Users Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sritharan, S., & Huang, J. (2010). Characterizing lateral load behavior of a pile in improved soils surrounded by soft clay using the Winkler analysis concept. In GeoFlorida 2010: Advances in Analysis, Modeling & Design, Geo-Institute, ASCE (pp. 1622-1632). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Soltani, H., & Muraleetharan, K. K. Predicting Seismic Response of a Single Pile in Cement-Treated Soft Clay Using a Bouc-Wen Type Model. In IFCEE 2018 (pp. 262-271). [Google Scholar]
  11. Boulanger, R. W., Curras, C. J., Kutter, B. L., Wilson, D. W., & Abghari, A. (1999). Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses. Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 125(9), 750-759. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Matlock, H. (1970, April). Correlation for design of laterally loaded piles in soft clay. In Offshore technology conference. OnePetro. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J., & Taylor, R. L. (1977). Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 5(3), 283-292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Muraleetharan, K. K., Mish, K. D., & Arulanandan, K. (1994). A fully coupled non‐linear dynamic analysis procedure and its verification using centrifuge test results. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 18(5), 305-325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Darendeli, M. B. (2001). Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves, Ph.D. Dissertation, The university of Texas at Austin. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dickenson, S. E., & Seed, R. B. (1994). Preliminary report on correlations of shear wave velocity and engineering properties for soft soil deposits in the San Francisco Bay Region. research report, Department of Civil Engineering, UCB/EERC-94/XX, Berkeley, CA. [Google Scholar]
  17. Vanapalli, S. K., Fredlund, D. G., Pufahl, D. E., & Clifton, A. W. (1996). Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Canadian geotechnical journal, 33(3), 379-392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.